Thursday, February 23, 2006

Read between the lines.

I have been thinking so hear me out. I starting to think that this port issue could be a political ploy for republicans to win seats over democrats next election. That way they can say that they are independent of the president I mean even George Bush is not that stupid to.......Okay maybe he is, but just maybe this is a Karl Rove operation. Bush wants to take on Congress and have Congress win this by overriding his veto. Why? Because Bush, Rove, Cheney are deathly afraid that one House of Congress will flip to the Democrats
in the 2006 election. If that happens, hearing are going to be held on a ton of issues with the possibility of Bush being impeached on the illegal wiretap issue. The way to stop this is to have the Republican Congress "show" to the American people that they are independent of the White House.
Seriously -- this is a classic Republican political play. People like Rick Santorum will run ads saying: "Santorum stood up to the President when he was wrong on the port issue. We need independent leaders like Rick Santorum." We are in the middle of a failed Presidency. Bush has given up on the American people and is just trying to preserve some kind of legacy that is not tainted with illegal activities being uncovered. If illegal activities were to be uncovered, then Jeb Bush would never
have a chance to become President down the road. Just a thought from the Evil One!

Friday, February 17, 2006

Quick Draw Cheney!

Hey guys check this out. Believe me if this was someone in the Clinton administration you will never hear the end of it. A Vice President only job is to preside over the Senate and replace the president if anything should happen. This guy waits 14 1/2 hours to talk to the cops and he can also declassify information. Four days after shooting a friend and then trying to prevent us from finding out, Dick Cheney poured
his heart out by answering edited, softball questions from Brit Hume, his first wife of FOX Whore News. Sobbing like a recovering crack whore on Oprah, Cheney said, "That was my finger on the gun. I pulled the trigger and even the great Karl Rove can't figure a way to blame this mess on Bill Clinton."
Cheney got off-script and admitted drinking beer prior to demonstrating "depraved indifference" to human life. Cheny's second in command George Bush said he believes ole Dick.
Armstrong, Cheney's new spokeswoman, told CNN that she never saw Cheney or Whittington "drink at all until after the accident occurred, when the vice president fixed himself a cocktail back at the house." This is an old lawyer's trick.
When you committ a crime drunk, hide from police and drink even more, thus preventing the cops from knowing how drunk you were when you pulled the trigger and almost (and may still) kill somebody. Follow the liquor,God Bless America

Monday, February 13, 2006

Thinkers of the worlds UNITE!

Hey guys if you want to see how the right wing is delving more into stupidity. Check this out! Believe me, they think that they are going to be in your face with this crap. We will show them different. Remember that have "Evolution" all wrong thats why this is easy. Plus none of them were there when God so called created this world and the Bible itself is not all accurate in any sense. Just ask them then who created God? If all things had to have a creator then God had a creator and they will lie and say well God was just here he was not created. You say BULL! Then your creationist story falls apart. Its like shooting fish in a barrel.

Excerpt:
Boys and girls," Ham said. If a teacher so much as mentions evolution, scream at him, "Excuse me, were you there?' Can you remember that?"

The children roared their assent.

"So who should you always trust, God or the scientists?"

The children answered with a thundering: "God!"


Yes, lie to the children teach them that science is lying to them.
Japan and India and the others will pass America in a flash while Bush-ordered religious insanity is force-fed to every young and confused mind trying to make sense of the world around him or her.

Abandon the centuries of enlightenment and fall back to the world of dark shadows.
Tell them Santa, Satan and the Easter Bunny are real.
Tell them water boils when it wants to, and water freezes whenever you say a prayer.
Tell them to dismiss medical science, and to pick up rattlesnakes if they want to be cured. We're raising an entire generation of illogical, anti-science losers who can't compete on the world stage. Heres a link to this insanity

http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-na-creation11feb11,0,1110748.
story?coll=la-home-headlines

Friday, February 10, 2006

Hypocrites Abound

Recently I was accused of spinning one of my entries. Despite the fact that I provided a link so anyone can view it. Now I am pretty busy so sometimes I miss things as I did in my last posting. This does not happen often. I was accused by BigDog of spinning my facts and intentionally leaving out some dialogue with Gonzales. Big Dog found some more info concerning that and I posted it on the site(it's still there). Big Dog still wants to say that I spin facts now keep in mind he was giving me props for being fair about Alito. Also keep in mind he supports a administration that when called in to court they will never swear in, conducts wiretaps that everyone knows is illegal except anyone in their administration. thats okay Bigdog I do not want an apology from you and you would not give one anyway(thats not your style) Plus it would not mean anything to me anyway. By the way to anyone who misreads this post the hypocrisy is in the selective skepticism. And as far as what Professor W says. I tell you what if they believe in "rule of law" then release all documents that the prosecutors ask for and stop blocking investigations and do not be afraid to swear in when asked.

Thursday, February 09, 2006

Be careful what you wish for!

I hope Big Dog does not return with this crap. Heres is a tape of torture boy explaining which administrations authorized electronic surveillance. Now I do not agree with everything on this site. But this is funny!

Remember the key word is "electronic" please try not to laugh.


http://www.infowars.com/video/clips/news/big_brother/020706_
gonzales_electro_surv.htm

Time to reign in the dog!

Big Dog who just the other day was giving me major props for being fair about Alito's record has accused me of spinning my entry concerning Feingold and Gonzales he claims that I left out intentionally the part of the text(which I sometimes leave things off my blog but I always provide a link to it so people can read it for themselves). Now here is the offending piece of info he just had to show me as if I had not seen it. the following is a response from Alberto Gonzales answering the question what administrations sought wiretaps outside FISA and did not get warrants

GONZALES: None come to mind, Senator, but I'd be happy to look to see whether or not that's the case.

FEINGOLD: I'll take it as a "no" unless you submit something.
(see BD's posting for the rest)
Now we know how the rest ends. You see Big Dog seems to focus on his percieved skullduggery only on one side . What questions has he thrown at this administration that have been critical. I was not trying to spin or trick any one I gave out the freaking link. But I do have a question. This administration loves to say others did it too. Okay.....which ones give me the names of past adminstrations who sought warrantless wiretaps outside of FISA. I want BigDog to find out which administrations
did it and I will post it on my blog. You see Gonzales could not answer Feingolds question because he knew none existed he was trying to buy time and Feingold knew it.
Remember this folks if this current administration knew they were following a precedent that another administration utilized why can't they cite who it was I mean this should be at the tips of their tongues right! The President does not have that kind of power period! Big dog find out who this mysterious administration is and report back to us now remember they have to have approached the same way Bush and co did(according to Bush) Happy hunting and by the way if you fail you owe me a apology. The clock is ticking.

Wednesday, February 08, 2006

Gotcha!!

Remember folks when I said that that evidence was faked when Colin visited the UN. I was criticized by everyone I was called a conspiracy nut and just plain wrong,. But check this out and believe me I am gloating it turns out Powells Chief of staff has a concience.
In a Feb 3 PBS interview, Colin Powell's former chief of staff claimed that the speech Powell made before
the United Nations on Feb. 5, 2003, laying out a case for war with Iraq, included falsehoods of which Powell
had never been made aware. He said, "My participation in that presentation at the UN constitutes the lowest
point in my professional life. I participated in a hoax on the American people, the international community and
the United Nations Security Council."

Colonel (ret.) Lawrence Wilkerson, still sees this lapse as the result of a profound intelligence failure, saying,
"I have to believe that. Otherwise I have to believe some rather nefarious things about some fairly highly placed
people in the intelligence community and perhaps elsewhere," hinting at Cheney and Rummy.
Link: http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Powells_former_chief_of_staff_on_0205
.html

I love it when I am right!

Business As Usual

Okay first of all I am so sick of these idiots who did not watch the funeral of Coretta Scott King and then try to critcize the speakers. I felt every remark made was appropiate. But what I find interesting about these neo-monkeys is that they keep saying that Bush did not get warrants because no other president had done it...What???
Now it is no shock that the above statement came from Sean Hannity. But if you guys watched the State Of The Union show you heard Bush say....

"Previous Presidents have used the same constitutional authority I have,
and federal courts have approved the use of that authority."

Hmmm interesting,but the Evil Genius is not finished here, check out the exchange
between Russ Feingold and Alberto(Torture Boy)Gonzales.(This is what I was talking about on the show when I mentioned Albertos accent)

Feingold:Do you know of any other President who has authorized
warrantless wiretaps outside of FISA?

Alberto Gonzales: Um, none come to mind, Senator. I can't give you an answer.

What the F**K? Why did not Feingold follow-up with, So why did your president lie last Tuesday? That would have been a great "follow up" question. here check out the link: http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/06/previous-admin/

Well I guess that was a dumb question on my part.

Sunday, February 05, 2006

Here comes the Judge!

Here is the info I was telling Mike about this morning about Alito. Check it out for your self and makeup your own mind.


http://news.findlaw.com/newsmakers/samuel.alito.html#cases

Monday, January 30, 2006

In a word Democracy!

Hey it seems the Bush administration only likes democracy when the people they want in office wins. I mean he actually said that the Palestinians elected a corrupt government. He speaks from experience.

Thursday, January 26, 2006

Go to sleep and let the band play on!

This posting is from one of my "partners in crime" Dennis (Red) Menace.

Abortion, Scalito and the last of the red hot barking
monkeys. Ok! For those of you in the normal flow of things
there probably isn't much here. As part of the
Republican Revolution (funny word that one,
revolution). In one sense denoting change, and in the
other referring to travelling the circumfrence of a
circle only to come back to the point you started at)
that began in 1996, was enthroned by judical edict in
2000 and weighs heavily now on the minds of
America-hating lefty types like me as the ice melts,
Europe freezes and the coasts drown.
Don't worry, says one of my favorite songs, go
back to sleep. Another, by the same artist, muses simply, "Learn
to swim." Big changes are coming in this grand revolution,
and as a student of history and the epistemes (look it
up fer crissakes...do a google on Foucault) that guide
it I find this all quite fascinating. Though I was
unable to make the show last week because I am still
forced to rely on 100 year old technology (the
internal combustion engine, more on this in a sec) as
a means of transportation, I did get a chance to call
in (nice job Jon, et al.) and there were a few points
I raised that I'd like to go over again:

Some thoughts on Martin Luther King, Jr. and his holy
day
My friends on the right like to start these types
of discussions with a nice first hand anecdote to set
the theme. I normally try and avoid these as they are
the least valuable of anything passing as a fact, but
in the spirit of the new times that are dawning as I
write, well...here goes.

In the last couple years I've worked a lot of
construction, and one of these jobs happened to be
a-way down south in Dixie. Everyone knew that I was a
Yankee and a liberal and had a general disdain for the
"Georges" of the world. One day the owner of the
company was standing with us as we had our morning
meeting and someone asked him jokingly if we would get
Dr. King's holiday off from work.

"Hell if we're going to do that why not kill 6
more niggers and take a week off," he replied.

Inspiring, no?

I often find it funny when people on the right
talk about the left, or insult its leaders. Surely
Harry Reid or Nancy Pelosi or Teddy Kennedy don't
necessarily strike us as prominent historical figures,
nor would we place a Jesse Jackson even or an Al
Sharpton on the same level as a Martin or a Malcolm.
Those of the right could point to figures from the
last fifty years who had pushed the cause to the point
of their now successful revolution with pride, even if
the rest of us look at a Nixon or a Reagan or a Bush
as common criminals made mad by power.

See, the thing is the great heroes of the left
aren't here to lead us now into the new dawn because,
by and large, they all got their fucking brains blown
out by some fucking hillbilly. Funny how that works.

Now that Martin is safely dead we can honor him,
with this one day, where maybe, just maybe, white
could look to non-whites and admit and ask forgiveness
for the crimes of racism...for the lynchings and rapes
and the beatings and the dogs and standing in the
courthouse door talking about miscegenation and not
mixing the races.

Some do. There would be no reason to continue the
dialogue between the races if there weren't peope from
all sides that can see past the biases ground into all
of us from birth. Dr. King knew this as he expanded
the civil rights cause in the last years of his life
and prepare to launch his anti-poverty poor people's
movement. Malcolm, too saw the truth of this after he
came back from Mecca and founded his own organization,
expressing a willingness to work with whoever was for
the cause of social justice and equality.

Most don't. White's get defensive when you bring
up the past. Blacks get angry and vent their
frustration with a system that is 1) slow to change,
and 2) unwilling to admit when it was wrong.

So what does King George do on the holiday? Does
he go to the old south and try and reach out to the
people left behind and left out, the people left
stranded on their roof tops because he was too busy to
give a shit if anyone was helping them? Does he try
and prove that he is a "uniter and not a
divider-upper?"

No. He goes to the Lincoln memorial and gives
thanks to a white guy for freeing the slaves...go
figure.

Now I mostly feel sorry for white's (those
individuals that you may often here or see me refer to
as "dumb crackers") still so caught up in some fantasy
facism ideal like white pride to see that they have
more in common with poor blacks than they do with rich
whites. It seems such a simple and obvious fact of
life in America that its shocking to me when people
dont get it. As long as we fight each other we are too
busy to fight the system that oppresses us all.

Which leads me into issue 2, namely: the
expansion of the powers of the presidency and the
executive branch.

It is not legal, in that old fashioned sense,
namely the laws on the books, for King George to
autorize spying on american citizens. My good friends
and obviously much more intelligent friends on the
right have made it clear that the above statement os
complete balderdash. That either something we will
call "provisional law" allows for it, or according to
AG Gonzles, the president was given this authority by
congresses authorization of military force after 9/11.
They expressly didn't give him this power, but who
cares really, cus he's doing it anyway and its for our
safety right, and that's what they really care about,
Bush and Rummy and the gang...our safety.

And the band plays on: "Go back to sleep..."

There is more going on here than this though.
More going on with the fight to overturn Roe and the
push for us all to accept that Alito is really a level
head guy, though he spent 25 years producing writing
that suggested he was, in fact, another right
wing-nut.

The president speaks only to groups that agree
with him. Protestors are always kept on the periphery
in what we call now "free speech zones." Funny how
when you want to protest King George and his imperial
and bloody war and do something to bring the senseless
killing to an end you have to stand a mile away...but
if you are a woman going into planned parenthood to
get a pap smear to make sure you don't have cervical
cancer, well, then the free speech zone is the
sidewalk out front and you have to pass through a
bunch of red hot barking monkeys holding up big
pictures of aborted fetuses.

Facism has a vile way of creeping in. What's the
line from the German guy? I paraphrase, "First they
came for the gypsies and I did nothing, Then they came
for the jews and I did nothing. And then they came for
me...and no one did anything."

We on the left don't fit and don't belong here
anymore. Just ask them, my many good friends on the
right. This is their country. Jesus is their savior.
Jehovah in all his wisdom is their god. And, by golly,
the bible and the constitution means what they say it
does. End of discussion...

They might profess an interest in new ideas,
thinking outside the box, challenging the status quo,
but they don't really mean it and very slowly they are
and will continue to criminalize dissident voices. If
we are to fight the enemy then we must be united, yes?
Don't worry, its for your own good, freedom is slavery
and knowledge is ignorance and the Right way is
obviously the right way...it even says so in the name.

They used to burn left-handed folks at the stake,
ya know. And so it goes...

Friday, January 20, 2006

Food for thought!

I will be In Dallas Tx on mon on business and Kc and the WSX gang will carry the torch in my absence. I was going to post here but I think you guys need to read this article. Its all one line but I had to break it up for the blog.It's sad but I think it paints an interesting picture.

http://groups.google.com/group/
Coalitionforfreethoughtinmedia/msg/339447f2ecaef4db

"Talk show hosts like Hannity, O'Reilly and Limbaugh act like they know all about war then they refuse to give any credence to soldiers like me who have been to war and seen the brutality of war. These guys are nothing but WEAK SPINELESS COWARDS hiding
behind microphones while soldiers come home and are losing everything they have."
--Spc. Doug Barber, who took his own life Tuesday, after struggling with PTSD for two years.

Thursday, January 19, 2006

Say goodbye to the dummy!

Since insecure neo-con idiots can not respect difference of opinion and also I do not want this site abused any more. Effective immediately no comment written will be posted immediately to the site. They will be posted but only after they are filtered. Which means you can still post your agreements or disagreements concerning me,its just that you will never hear from starchild or any other neo con idiot ever again due to their abusive and name calling they will be automatically filtered out. I have a list of people who I will allow to post immediately to this blog and I will be contacting you about it. So have fun and know that you never have to worry about those idiots again.

The idiot strikes again!

Lets all have a laugh at the child who keeps posting. Go ahead post something else stupid silly child.This guy is so insecure.
I am sure you have read the comments from the so called little dumb child or the "child". You see folks this wannabe host can not talk principle so what he is reduced to is gay name calling. It made his small day for me to respond to him. The more he insults the less he knows. I will always remove entries from this person because all Mr.M does is insult. What an idiot this person really is. You see folks, this person will not call the show because they do not want to face real opposition so this is their only outlet. Maybe this person has gay issues I do not know or nor do I care.
But just remember this that everytime he posts something stupid just remember it is a testament to our side and how we are correct and they are lost so lets laugh at this human debris and wait for his next stupid posting.I would love to actually have an open dialogue between myself and the "child" but I do not think they he has the capacity to be on my level. But I will await a negative posting in regards to this. You can do it "child". Keep posting here on this blog because I am way out of your league. Don't hate "lil child" Appreciate!

Wednesday, January 18, 2006

Fake Outrage!

Oh wow let's see..... Hilary makes an accurate comment about the adminstration and the republicans are pretending that they are upset about it and that they never engage in race baiting. I will not waste too much time with this because this is so stupid. You see if you watch fox news or listen to right wing talk radio you will never know that Newt Gingrinch said the exact same thing about twelve years ago to describe democrats and guess what?........The republicans forgot to be upset with Newt. Also out of all the things Hilary said. They keep coming back to this plantation comment. Hilary said it on purpose and got the desired response. Here is the exact statement so you can see what she actually said.

"has been run like a plantation, and you know what I'm talking about,It has been run in a way so that nobody with a contrary view has had a chance to present legislation, to make an argument, to be heard."

"We have a culture of corruption, we have cronyism, we have incompetence," she said. "I predict to you that this administration will go down in history as one of the worst that has ever governed our country." Out of all this they just heard plantation.
She told the truth.....any questions

Friday, January 13, 2006

Hey "Dumb Child"! Tick Tock Tick Tock!

Lets all have a laugh at the child who keeps posting. Go ahead post something else stupid silly child.This guy has been so hell bent on insulting me that he just made one crucial mistake. Tick Tock "dumbchild".
I am sure you have read the comments from the so called little dumb child or the "child". You see folks this wannabe host can not talk principle so what he is reduced to is gay name calling. It made his small day for me to respond to him. The more he insults the less he knows. I will always remove entries from this person because all Mr.M does is insult. What an idiot this person really is. You see folks, this person will not call the show because they do not want to face real opposition so this is their only outlet. Maybe this person has gay issues I do not know or nor do I care.
But just remember this that everytime he posts something stupid just remember it is a testament to our side and how we are correct and they are lost so lets laugh at this human debris and wait for his next stupid posting.I would love to actually have an open dialogue between myself and the "child" but I do not think they he has the capacity to be on my level. But I will await a negative posting in regards to this. You can do it "child". Keep posting here on this blog because I am way out of your league. Don't hate "lil child" Appreciate!

Monday, January 09, 2006

A TRUE PATRIOT!

So we're seeking some common ground yes? Two wings
make the eagle fly, what what?

First, I'd ask you to site some specific refrences of
the "untrue things" you've heard or seen me write or
say about Bush. It is certainly not my intention to
spread more falsehoods. It is my intent to spread some
light to some of the dark corners that the
establishment wishes us not to see.

Here we will likely come to the first obstacle between
us: bias in the media. Those of the right-wing would
have us believe that the media as an interest is
liberal, or left-leaning. Those on the left see
corporate interests that could not help but be biasd
towards their owners, namely, the people on the right
who believe that the media is liberal...ad naseum, ad
infinitum.

I may be wrong, but i believe in logic this is termed
a solipism. A circular argument...

Still, we have to discern and refine our thoughts and
opinions based on the information that comes to us via
the media. As a media consumer I try to draw from as
wide a range of material and mediums so as to have a
reasonable handle on what everyone is saying.

As a media producer, first through the Free Press,
then through the show and my latest career venture, I
admit a bias. I like underdogs, I like the meek, the
poor, the weak of heart. I like to champion their
causes because no one else, or few else, will.

Here we reach the second obstacle: interpretation.

What's it all mean? Wars and elections and taxes and
the whole big world...what does it all mean? I would
assume, I think reasonably, that you are a Christian.
You have sent me religious material, and I have the
sense that you are, moreover, an apocalyptic
Christian, waiting for the rebuilding of the temple
and the gathering of the armies at Megiddio.

I must admit that I don't fully grasp the brand of
Christianity that seems all the craze these days.
There is a hateful attitude that drives a group of
people to pickett someone's funeral. Do we have common
ground here, Chris?

I too look to the skies and await the return of the
son of man. I look to the day of judgement when we
will all have to account and atone for our actions. I
look to the day when blessed will be the peacemakers,
and the meek inherit the earth. What a grand thing...

We all have our filters. From my good book and all
those sunday school lessons I learned tolerance,
humility, and forgiveness. Do we have common ground
here?

You speak of national identity, and I will tell you
first off that I am leery of nationalism as a means of
motivating a people. I am not threated by a
pluralistic society that can speak with many voices.
My concept of personal liberty is the freedom from
nationalistic or other "group think" philosophies.
Still, there is something to being a nation. We are
unique species among all the races of man, because we
are all races of man. And woman. Queer and straight
and black and white and indian and african and polish
and the whole sordid lot. We are all america, so in my
vision there is no national identity without near
absolute personal liberty.

I also believe, futhermore, that the basis of our
government and the spirit of our constitution should
always stem from a deep and profound respect for the
liberty and soverignty of the individual. Is there
common ground here?

Here we reach the next road block: the culture wars.

I am to assume that if not you, then most right-wing
Christians, republicans, neo-cons and the whole lot,
would be really threatened if my sister and her wife
could have a legally sanctioned union? I am further to
assume that the idea of a worker owning their own
labor is also to be ranked among the many liberal "bad
ideas." I am also to assume that the very idea that,
given the vast resources and talents at the disposal
of mankind, that the idea that everyone should be fed
and clothed, provided shelter and safe drinking water,
that everyone should be afforded the basic necesities
of life...this too would be another bugaboo sent to
threaten the hallowed halls of western civilization?


I too see a great nation crumbling. I see broken
infrastructure, corruption, and the consoldation of
power in the hands of fewer and fewer people. I see
the people's fears used as a means to keep them
divided and servile. I see the slow, steady
degredation of our enviroment as the insatiable
american appetite continues to devour more and more
resources.

We may argue about forms of economic exchange,
supply-side trickle down or estate taxes or why it is
a threat to the economy to suggest that people on
minimum wage should get a dollar raise, but how it
never seems a threat to the economy when a ceo tacks
on another milion dollar bonus.

We could argue these finer points all we want, but in
the end the system we have in place now and that looms
large over the world, global corporate commodification
of every aspect of life, well, that system is simply
not sustainable.

Maybe the money or the oil or the potable water runs
out in 2040, or 2090, or maybe we even make it another
century as a nation...what then? What does the future
hold Chris? Were all the wars and votes and lives cast
before history so we could end up handing over to our
great grandchildren one world under Halliburton? Is
there no limiting the market? Ever? What do they call
this...worshipping mannon?

As to leadership. Striking new ground may be bold, and
bold action may be what the situation warrants.
Sometimes though, especially if you have no recon of
the wilderness, if you have no idea where to cross the
streams, or no concept of where the ice is
weak...well, sometimes caution and wisdom should weigh
out over bold action, lest the whole enterprise be
lost...my idea is that a real leader knows the
difference between the two. Do we have common ground
here?

Lincoln made the point: a house divided can not stand.

I respect you, and everyone that aligns themselves
with the right wing of this great eagle. I hope that
in the end we can accept one another and face the
challenges as one nation, indivisble...but I will not
willingly see this nation congealed under a banner of
demographic marketing, christian fundamentalism and
the morals of the Spartan war state.

See any common ground?

dennis-the red menace

Friday, January 06, 2006

The Coward Returns!(aka Baby Huey)

Lets all have a laugh at the child who keeps posting. Go ahead post something else stupid silly child.
I am sure you have read the comments from the so called little star child or the "child". You see folks this wannabe host can not talk principle so what he is reduced to is gay name calling. It made his small day for me to respond to him. The more he insults the less he knows. I will always remove entries from this person because all Mr.M does is insult. What an idiot this person really is. You see folks, this person will not call the show because they do not want to face real opposition so this is their only outlet. Maybe this person has gay issues I do not know or nor do I care.
But just remember this that everytime he posts something stupid just remember it is a testament to our side and how we are correct and they are lost so lets laugh at this human debris and wait for his next stupid posting.I would love to actually have an open dialogue between myself and the "child" but I do not think they he has the capacity to be on my level. But I will await a negative posting in regards to this. You can do it "child". Keep posting here on this blog because I am way out of your league. Don't hate "lil child" Appreciate!

Fair is Fair Letterman!

I was disgusted at the exchange between David Letterman and Bill O"Reilly the other day. Now I am no big fan of O'Reilly but in all fairness he was ambushed by Letterman and Paul Schaeffer they were trying to ridicule him. I mean the interview started off nice Letterman was giving him a honest talk of how that was crap of that Christmas attack business Fox and Bill have been pushing. Cool I was with Letterman on that part. But we parted ways when he got off that subject and into waters he had no business swimming. This is why the left gets teased and accused of going off half cocked. Letterman while insulting O'Reilly admitted he never watched the show so Bill rightfully said then how can you comment on my show. Now I do not feel totally sorry for Bill because I do watch his show and he does the same thing plus he lies but I do not like to see people get ambushed whether its liberals or conservatives(notice I did not say neo-con there is a difference I hate them)sadly Letterman stooped to O'Reilly and Hannity's level you have to call them on their crap whether you like them or not! You see people are always criticizing myself and the show but can not bring a single instance of substance only name calling which Letterman engaged in.
What Bill should have done is slapped Letterman and kicked Paul in his nuts and walked out.(damn lightweights) Just Kidding! Letterman quit doing your imitation of Rosie O'Donnell and get a clue. Now some of you may have some kind of cognitive dissonance that I critiqued Bill O'Reilly but yet took his side... Well if you can not understand independent opinion then you are beyond help.

Wednesday, January 04, 2006

Bonfire of the Inanities!

With all the things going on in this country. I mean with the whitehouse being overun with felons and scandals in the whitehouse and congressional scandals I am glad that Bill O'Reilly decided to really talk about what really on the minds of americans...holiday salutations. What a Jerk. But now we come face to face with another neo-con scandal with Abramoff. Reminds me of ole Cunningham in california.
But say this much for Cunningham. He set a good example for his fellow Republicans by resigning in disgrace. If by next year at this time we’ve seen several more Republicans blubbering like defrocked beauty queens after copping pleas, 2006 will seem blessedly shorter than 2005.

Remember this: (thinking americans only please)
George W. Bush picked a fight he was sure he could win — because the con artists who own and operate him told him he could. So in front of every other kid in the world, he called his victim out to the playground and had six or seven of his goons restrain the little guy while he hit him with everything he could find. In doing so, he pissed off everyone else on the playground. So when Bush turned away from his bloodied victim to raise his hands in triumph, he was hit squarely from behind with a two-by-four. Repeatedly. And it hasn’t stopped for two and a half years. Boy its sure good to see the devil get his due. Isn't God wonderful!

Tuesday, January 03, 2006

Crazy Quotes!

Here are some interesting quotes I discovered.

"As you can probably see I was injured myself, not here at the hospital but in combat with a cedar. I eventually won."
-- Dubya, joking about getting wounded clearing brush on his fake ranch with amputee soldiers,


"We must never tolerate one law for the Ruler, and another for the Ruled."

-- Henry Hyde, back when the president was a Democrat (damn hyocrite)
Henry, where are you?
Isn't it time to speak up?


"I don’t know of any legal basis to go around the FISA court. There may be some, but I’m not aware of it. And here’s the concern I have. We can’t become an outcome-based democracy. Even in a time of war, you have to follow the process, because democracy is about a process."
-- Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-Whore)
Lindsey, you impeached the last president who you thought broke the law.
What's stopping you this time?


"This needs to be investigated, because whoever leaked this information
has done the U.S. and its national security a great disservice."
-- Mitch McConnell (R-Whore) pretending Osama had no idea Bush could listen to phone calls.

"If leaking classified info is such a big deal, then when is Karl Rove being fired?
Seriously. When is Karl being fired?
Or is it only a crime to leak when it proves that Bush is committing a felony?"
-- John Aravosis.
I had fun with these quotes it seems the neo-cons have a different set of standards when its their guy.

Sunday, January 01, 2006

Happy New Year !

Happy New Year! Lets hope this new year brings this great country's government some accountability. Cheers!

Saturday, December 31, 2005

Impeachment! Why yes.

This is what Bush's impeachment hearing will be like. It will play like that scene from a few good men.


Bush: Wiretapping? Wiretapping?

Son, we live in a world that has liberals.

And those liberals have to be stopped by men with wiretaps.

Who's gonna do it? You?

You, swiftboat Kerry?

I have a greater responsibility to defend our oil interests than you can possibly fathom.

You weep for the Constitution and you curse the NSA. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing how much I don't know: that the Constitution's death, while tragic, probably gave record profits to the oil companies.

And my reelection, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves profits...

You don't want the truth. Because deep down, in places you don't talk about at you gay marriage receptions, you want me spying on you. You need me spying on you.

We use words like God, late-term abortions, intelligent design... we use these words as the backbone to a life spent dividing a nation.

You use 'em to further your whiny liberal causes.

I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to my subjects who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very "freedom" I provide, then questions the manner in which I provide it!

I'd rather you just said "hail Bush" and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you flush down a Koran and start torturing some terrorists. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you're entitled to!

Congress: Did you order the wiretappings?

Bush: I did the job the Supreme Court elected me to do.

Congress: Did you order the code red?

Bush: You're goddamn right I did!!

And by god I mean the voices in my head.

And 9/11.
Boy those neo-cons really hate "rule of law" when it applys to them.

Friday, December 30, 2005

What a coward!

I am sure you have read the comments from the so called star child or the "child".
You see folks these cowards can not talk principle so what they are reduced to is gay name calling. The more he insults the less he knows. I have tried to remove entries from this person but I decided to let them stay on to show people what an idiot this person really is. You see folks this person will not call the show because they do not want to face real opposition so this is their only outlet. Maybe this person has gay issues I do not know or nor do I care.
But just remember this that everytime he posts something stupid just remember it is a testament to our side and how we are correct and they are lost so lets laugh at this human debris and wait for his next stupid posting.I would love to actually have an open dialogue between me and the "child" but I do not think they he has the capacity to be on my level. But I will await a negative posting in regards to this. You can do it "child"

Wednesday, December 21, 2005

The Freakman Cometh!

Okay I must admit whenever I hear Bill O'reilly say something about morality I burst out with a big gut laugh. Okay first of all it started wuth this judge(republican Bush appointee mind you) who ruled in Dover Delaware that intelligent design does not need to be mentioned as an alternative view in a biology class. The judge was right ID is not science. I mean how many churches let atheist groups get up in church and say there is an alternative view to theism.Answer none. So what is their f**king problem.
Oh yeah I forgot they are pests thats their problem.And for you readers I am not talking about the average christian I am talking about the Pat Robertston type nutcases. Anyway O'reilly went out against this gay movie called Brokeback mountain(about gay cowboys). He kept saying on how this movie was terrible and immoral(never saw it) then he would punctuate each sentence with I do not care about the movie. Then why talk about it then? I mean is this the same guy who told his female producer that he is masturbating over the phone while he is talking to her and how he loves a dildo in his ass. I think this movie hits close to home lil Billy and go see this movie you may realize something about yourself and if you can't come don't call.

They put the Funk in Dysfunctional!

It seems that the nutcases are at it again. These Christmas freaks are out of their mind. No please I am not bashing christmas I happen to like christmas but in an effort to get more money from their flock. These holiday pimps are taking very fringe isolated small cases of christmas bashing and making it mainstream. So they are creating a christmas crisis when none really exists. If you want to know whats that tantamount too just imagine if I gathered all the incidents of all isolated cases of white oppression against minorites then said on my show these whites are mean and they are attacking minorities everyday. Now thats not representative of all whites and thats stupid and imprudent to assume that premise. But if you will around look you will find that christmas crisis revels on fox news and every neo-con show.You see neo-cons look for logic like a thief looks for a policeman. If you hear a rattoothed neo-con give you that christmas lie again. Tell to shut up and take his/her f**king medicine.

Tuesday, December 20, 2005

Almost had him.

The following is a dramatization based on events that happened last year when Iraqi security forces captured Zarqawi and let him go because they could not identify him and also despite of the fact there are pictures of him all over the place.
Setting: Baghdad,Iraq police station.
(Scene: Two Iraqi police officers are questioning a suspect. They do not know who he is but in reality he is blood thirsty terrorist insurgent Zarqawi.)

1st Officer: So who are you friend?

2nd Officer: Yeah who are you? You look like this Zarqawi guy(throws down on the desk a copy of a magazine with Zarqawi's face on the cover).

Suspect(Zarqawi): Well my name is um...umm......ummm Ned and I am from Compton yeah thats right.

1st Officer: (disbelief)Hmmm are you sure. Because if you are the bandit Zarqawi, we will take you to the secret cia prison camp and torture you.

2nd Officer: Yeah we are already kidnapping innocent Oops! I mean were are capturing enemy combatants and with out much evidence we are dunking their heads in water until they drown and then we electroshock them back to life and ask them questions.Also we hook electrodes to their genitals and then zap them and then ask them questions and identify what terrorist group they are from we have to identify every potential terrorist.

Suspect(Zarqawi): Gosh that sounds alot like torture to me.

1st Officer: Shut up fool! we are merely engaging in light aggressive interrogation techniques according to the wonderful Bush adminstration memos.

2nd Officer: But back to the what we were saying earlier you look a lot like Zarqawi I mean you look like all the photos of him.

Suspect(Zarqawi):(using the Jedi mind trick on them) No I am not him, I am from Nebraska. You will not need my identification you will let me go at once.

1st Officer:(Jedi trick working)Well although we can not identify you and that is important. Despite the fact of your uncanny resemblence you are obviously are not him because we can not identify you. So we will continue snatching and detainng people and asking them hard questions and maybe we can find Zarqawi one day.

Suspects gets up to leave room and has he walks out the door he is greeted by his 6ft 6 wife wheeling a very strange contraption behind her. Hmmm probably nothing! The officers goes back to watching the ending of a movie called the "Usual Suspects".

Sunday, December 18, 2005

Wrong again! Doggy Dog Dog!

This is why Bush is in so much trouble. Look at the comment section of the previous posting. Much like the administration Big Dog cherry picked info concerning spying and accused me of being deceitful. This is what he said
"READ THIS ANTHONY!!!!!!!!
I suggest you look at the law itself and stop your assinine media sourced opinions. I mean for fucks sake man, this is the second instance you have indulged in such ill-informed misleading tactics."

Okay you know Doggy is right! I mean although I said in my last posting that neo-cons do not let facts get in the way of their opinions. Maybe we should look at what Big Dog posted (note) There is a reason why thinking people like the NSA officials Aclu,Congress and others feel that laws were broken. You see No President can make an executive order that can supercede the Constitution with the exception of Martial Law(maybe). When you review what Big Dog put up you will come to find out has I have that these provisions did not cover domestic spying, hell it does not even mention the word domestic in any of Big Dog postings. You see law makers and the NSA knew this thats why they were a little antsy. Now here is where the splitting of legal hairs come in, the provisions cover foreign intel only now if you are intercepting emails that originate in the states thats not foreign intel thats domestic intel which has certain laws governing that which the President did not follow(notice Big Dog did not post anything having to do with domestic spying because he was trying to trick you and I (much like the President) to use those foreign provisions to apply domestically. (maybe big dog is not used to doing his own research if he makes a big blunder like that) Sorry Big Dog, that Dog won't hunt! So I want you to see Big Dogs postings its under the Say it ain't so post. Big Dog I am shocked that you in your dislike of me put up such a silly posting that proves my point again! Here is a question for you Dog (to get you on the right side of the arguement)I dare you to answer.. Where in the constitution allows the President to do what he did? And why did he violate the domestic portion of the act and bypass the courts? I will ask you this on the air tommorow Doggy and until you redeem yourself and apologize for being wrong you will be known as little dog. Impeachment anyone?

Anthony say it ain't So! Its So.

It seems that people do not realize the severity of this latest Bush fiasco.
There is a protocol stated forth in the law that the President has to follow involving warrants from the courts secret or otherwise. This man blatantly did not follow any rules. He bypassed the courts why? What constitutional law allows this? There were even operatives from the NSA (whose job it is to spy)who felt uneasy and wondered about the legality of this operation and did not help the administration out and I know this because it was implied in the article of the Times when it read that "Some NSA officials were so concerned about the legality of the program that they refused to participate" Also the Times said. "Questions about the legality of the program led the administration to temporarily suspend it last year and impose new restrictions." Now all of you individuals who love to quote FISA please do not forget this part....
The law governing clandestine surveillance in the United States, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, prohibits conducting electronic surveillance not authorized by statute. A government agent can try to avoid prosecution if he can show he was "engaged in the course of his official duties and the electronic surveillance was authorized by and conducted pursuant to a search warrant or court order of a court of competent jurisdiction," according to the law. Now this part is important

"Engaged in the course of his official duties and the electronic surveillance was authorized by and conducted pursuant to a search warrant or court order of a court of competent jurisdiction," Does anyone out there knows what pursuant means? Big Dog?

That is the part Bush missed because there were no warrants or court orders issued.
The only thing he did that neo-cons will try to say was court related was that he notified the judge and talked to some congressional members thats it! Notifying the court is not a warrant or a court order, neither is talking to Congressional members. Get it! And remember that the activities of the NSA fall out of the jurisdiction of the Patriot Act.(read it if you do not believe me). As a former board member of the ACLU (The American Civil Liberties Union)eavesdropping in the US without a court order and without complying with the procedures of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act is "both illegal and unconstitutional". Hey do not take my word for it. Listen to what Elizabeth Rindskopf Parker,former NSA general counsel said, "it was troubling that such a change would have been made by executive order, even if it turns out to be within the law".

Hey I just found this out the NSA activities were justified by a classified Justice Department legal opinion authored by John C. Yoo, a former deputy in the Office of Legal Counsel who argued that congressional approval of the war on al Qaeda gave broad authority to the president,this was according to the Times. Now remember Yoo was the one that made a very similar legal argument in another 2002 memo which outlined an extremely narrow definition of torture. That opinion, which was signed by another Justice official, was formally disavowed after it was disclosed by the Washington Post. Hey Neo-Con's please do not let these facts get in the way of your opinions.

Saturday, December 17, 2005

Just A Thought!

Your right Dennis(The Red)Menace about the communism remark. I'll fix that.
But I want to add to what you commented on. The neo-cons are bitch blind and can only see the bad that democrats and liberals and libertarians. So I doubt if any one will be honest about this. Remember "Compassionate Conservatism" is really "Friendly Fascism"!

Zarqawi who? Never heard of him!

Now here is something that makes me wonder. Iraqi security forces(What does that mean?) caught Zarqawi last year but released him. What the F**K?
And here is the punchline, because they didn't realize who he was according to the deputy minister Kamal. he told reporters. He said that Iraqi police "suspected this man" and detained him "along with other members" of his group. "Afterwards, he was released because we did not know the identity of this criminal," Kamal said.

"He was not armed," Kamal said. "He was like any other citizen who was suspected.
There was a simple interrogation with him and he was released."

Okay here is my evil point. If they can't tell when they've hit the jackpot, why are they detaining anybody?
If they let Zarqawi go - then who in the F**K are they detaining? Is it just me folks.

Funny Quotes!

Hey this is something Bush said and I thought it was funny enough to share it now if your a neo_con you will miss the humor and call me an american hater.


"Yes, I do."
- ( Bush, when he was asked by Britney Hume if he believes Tom DeLay is innocent.

Now here is my point that's strange because when they asked Bush "Is Karl Rove innocent?" he said "I can't comment on that." What a difference a lie makes.

1984 has already been here!

Okay I know you heard the reports about Bush authorized the NSA(here is an organization that really uses the Patriot Act) to spy on Americans.

The National Security Agency has eavesdropped, without warrants, on as many 500 people inside the United States at any given time since 2002, The New York(Bush) Times reported.

That year, following 9-11, Bush authorized the NSA to monitor the international phone calls
and international e-mails of hundreds — perhaps thousands — of people inside the United States.

Before the program began, the NSA typically limited its domestic surveillance to foreign embassies and missions and obtained court orders for such investigations.

The revelation that the Bush administration is using the NSA to spy on Americans without a court order is disturbing for many reasons. Besides the obvious move towards a crypto-fascist society the fact that the New York Times sat on this story for more than a year because the White House told them to(can you believe that shit,liberal media my ass) this act shows that not only are we secretly being spied on, but also that Bush has control over the press. This is an administration that pays journalist to push their agenda and misleads us into a war then changes the reason for it when it goes bad. Then fixes Saddams trial as not to implicate two Republican administrations
Am I the only one disturbed by this. Lets see Bush is good and Clinton had a intern pay attention to his nutsack and he is a dispicable and lying and untrustworthy person. Hmmm sounds about right!

Monday, December 12, 2005

Gotta Love Saddam!

Boy that Saddam is sure giving that "kangaroo court" a run for its money.
I mean not showing up for court, telling people to go to hell. I find this very entertaining. Just some questions I have surrounding this trial.

Why is he not being charged with anything having to do with 911?

Why is he being charged with crimes prior to 1982 and not the 1983 and 1988 crimes in which he killed Iranians and Kurds and put them in mass graves. Which is one of the reasons we invaded(remember mass graves being filled remember that bullshit)
I am sure it had nothing to do with the fact that we sold him those weapons and helped him cover up those kurds deaths. So Saddam recognizes that he is being setup so he is acting a fool and I love it.

Fake Outrage!!

I am loving this fake outrage act about "happy holidays" and "merry christmas" being eradicated form our speech. I mean there are so many genuine things to be mad about than this stupid stupid area of human interest. If you for even one second are outraged about this, then you need a life and you are really pathetic. I mean out of all that is going on in our country ie, mismanaged war, lies concerning this war, spy in the whitehouse. We as Americans pick this to be outraged about. Well F**k those who are outraged and F**k christmas too. Merry Christmas!

Friday, December 02, 2005

To Torture or not to Torture?

I can not believe that these neo-cons have trouble recognizing torture.
I mean rational human beings like ourselves know torture when we see it right? I mean I am not against torturing the terrorist when we find them, but lets be honest about what we do. Below is a lie er..... I mean quote from Cheney loyalist Porter Goss. Now decide for yourself if its torture.....

“What we do, does not come close to torture...”
-- CIA Director Porter Goss

Hmmm does not come close to torture......?
It's amazing that Goss would say that, after the White House admitted they've gotten
"valuable secrets" from their practice of "water boarding." Do you know what that is?

It's when you tie a man to a see-saw device, where the shifting of weight is enough to
lower his head under water. After he gets a few lungfulls of water, and sometimes dies,
they pull him out, electric-shock him back to life(stay with me) so they can torture him Oops! I mean ask him some more questions(I guess that electro shock thing is just to get his attention, Damn ADHD).
They kill him again and again - over and over - and if they go too far and he can't be
revived, they call it "a mysterious death" and have a Pentagon doctor rule that the
suspect died of "natural causes."

Does that sound like torture to you? Can we make that call????

A secret memo issued by Administration lawyers authorized the C.I.A. to use novel interrogation
methods—including “water-boarding,” in which a suspect is bound and immersed in water until he
nearly drowns. Dr. Allen Keller, the director of the N.Y.U. Program for Survivors of Torture, said that he had treated a number of people who had been subjected to such forms of near-asphyxiation,
and he argued that it was indeed torture. Some victims were still traumatized years later, he said.
One patient panicked when it rained. (When it freaking rained)

Monday, November 28, 2005

Never trust a politician!

Okay folks elections are coming up and watch how these democrats and republicans start to lie to you. Remember politicians only seem to care about you during election time.
The democrats voted for invasion because it was an election year and they did not want to seem soft on terror(never forget that). It was a pragmatic vote. So take care and listen to the show tonight.

Thursday, November 24, 2005

To Catch a Thief !

Halliburton Co. repaid $8.6 million to pension holders in 2003 and 2004 for failing to properly fund the plans
and for a bookkeeping error, according to a letter from the Labor Department. The Labor Department closed
its investigation into the pension violations after the payments were made.

"Because you have taken the corrective actions ... the Department will take no further action," Roger Hilburn,
regional director for the Labor Department said in the letter, which cited several potential legal violations by the company.
The Houston-based company said once the errors were discovered, it moved to cover the payments.

When the crooked president and VP are your partners, when you get caught stealing millions,
you just have to say, "My bad" and return some of the money and everything is cool as hell.
But if you're poor, and you get caught stealing a turkey for your family to eat, you do hard time. Goddamn Bastards!

Thursday, November 17, 2005

Targets My Ass!!

This entry is from John Tackett.

We live in a free society that has a free press,free speech and the right
to have a exchange of ideas including ideas that can be disturbing.

That statement is lost on E.Dean Gall who think the Abu Ghraib photo's
shouldn't be release because it would make targets of american
soldiers like thier loved one.

I have some news for the Gall's. Your son is a target because he was sent by
the President of the United States to a country that had nothing
to do with 9/11. What happen in Abu Ghraib is already news!!!!! in the
world. Your son is a target because he wears the uniform of a U.S.
Soldier who is part of a occupation force in another country that borders
weren't closed so more insurgents have come into Iraq to add to
Iraq's who don't want your son there. (that makes him a target).

Your son is defending also the right to disagree with the goverment when
the citizens feel that a policy is wrong. ( I thank him and all soldiers
for that right.)

The ACLU isn't to blame if a soldier dies in Iraq or Afganistan. Our
responsibility as citizens is to hold the goverment accountable for
what it does and to make sure that our politicans are accountable to the
truth. When we don't do that we get people like George Bush
leading us...

The World Needs To Hold A Big Cocktail Party!!

Random Thoughts From Sidekick Extraodinare
Episode Three: From John Tackett

Hi Gang,

1) The Senate voted 90-9 to ban the use of torture in trying to interogate
non combatants. One of the sponsors of this vote was John MCcain a POW and torture victim during the Vietnam War. Our VP (The Real
President) was lobbying senators a last week to vote against the measure.
Gee he even talked to Sen. MCcain about the pluses of torture. (Well he
found 9 idiots to go with him) Gee I would have loved to been in the room
when the VP made his pitch to John MCCain... ("WHAT A REAL MOMENT OF ZEN")


2) Senator Maria Cantwell (D) from Washington want to have the big oil
executives sworn in for the hearings on the price fixing on the oil prices.
Well Senator Ted Stevens (R) from Alaska had a real "hissy fit"
about this. Question: WHY?????? What is the big oil boys trying to hide
from us??? If you are one of the morons (and there are a bunch,examples:
Jerry Agar on 980 KMBZ and any "AYN RAND dumb*&^) then you are a real KOOLAID DRINKING MORON!!!!!!!

3) Can someone please explain to me why Pat "Marion" Robertson is a
important figure???? (Marion is Robertson's real name and he isn't
licensed as a minister) This guy makes more over the top statements
then Ann Coulter .This moron said that the folks of Dover Pa.should not be surprised if God rejects them because of the vote they made rejecting the morons who want (ID) taught in a science setting.(Gee those voices that Marion hears in
his head well if they are God maybe one of these days God will want Marion
to come home by using his own means..)

4) To the Vets out in the Blog Thanks guys and girls for what you did
for this country and go and join the rest of us in having one big cocktail
cause the stupid people are running the country and I got my U.S.
flag turned upside down cause we are under seige not by the terrorist
but by STUPID PEOPLE.

Wednesday, November 16, 2005

Sean Hannity Is A Trick Bitch!!

Sean Hannity(R-Insane Lying Whore)always likes to repeat this lie over and over again you know the lie...... "If the democrats were in power mass graves would still be filled and the rape and tortures rooms would still go on"....really dumbass let me count the ways. In 1988 Saddam gassed the Kurds and America sold him even more weapons of mass destruction Oh yeah by the way he threw the bodies in "MASS GRAVES" the same mass graves that he used has a lie Oops! I mean reason to go into the country to invade! America helped Saddam cover it up. Which could go to explain why Saddam is being charged with pre 1983-88 crimes and not anything having to do with 9-11(interesting). In 1983 he killed Iranians and Reagan sent Donald Rumsfeld to ensure Iraqi/American relations and of course we sold him more weapons(Anthony say it ain't so). Its so! So basically I am am refuting Sean Hannity's ASSertions to prove that under two Republican adminstrations that rape and torture rooms went on and mass graves were filled(Damn I am good) and they did not bat and eye. Now all of a sudden they care about the goings on 17 years later.What! And do not give me this Clinton thought so to crap. The next time some crippled bitch neo-monkey slithers up to you and says that. You respond by saying... Well here is the TRUTH on that one.

This claim, while accurate, is completely irrelevant to the question of whether Bush lied us to war. What follows are a few of the things Clinton and Democrats didn’t say in the run-up to war. Yet these are claims—starting in the fall of 02—which took us to war in Iraq:

1) President Clinton didn’t say: That Saddam could have a nuke within six months. That was the statement of Vice President Cheney—and it contradicted the state of the intelligence.

2) President Clinton didn’t say: That there was only one use for those aluminum tubes—that the tubes could only be used in nukes. That statement was made by Condoleezza Rice. It contradicted the state of the intelligence.

3) President Clinton didn’t say: That Iraq had unmanned aerial vehicles which it “could use...to deliver biological weapons to its neighbors or, if transported, to other countries including the United States.” That clownish claim was made by Colin Powell in his presentation before the UN—the presentation which ended debate about the war. (In Plan of Attack, Bob Woodward drew a devastating picture of the way Powell assembled this report. Liberal elites ignored it, though. Reading books is just too gosh-darn hard.)

4) President Clinton didn’t say: That Iraq could fire up its chemical and biological weapons within 45 minutes. That was President Bush, in September 2002—making the statement which George Tenet derided as “the 45-minute shit.” President Clinton wasn’t talking this “shit;” it was Bush who was talking it. (In Plan of Attack, Bob Woodward describes Tenet ridiculing Bush’s statement this way. Liberal elites ignored it.)

5) President Clinton didn’t say: That Saddam was seeking uranium from Africa. Whatever you’ve decided about this claim—we’d say it played an extremely small role in the run-up to war—it wasn’t Bill Clinton who made it.

6) And, of course, President Clinton didn’t say: That Iraq was involved in September 11. That was the Bush team, over and over. The claim was made to build the impression that Saddam was inclined to attack us. With those UAVs, for example. In as little as forty-five minutes.

The concept here isn’t all that tough. Yes, most people did believe that Iraq would have chemical or biological weapons. We’d assume that the Bush Admin actually thought this too.
But chemical and biological weapons weren’t a threat to the United States—so the Bush Admin began to pimp the idea that Saddam might also have nukes. The heavy pimping of the nukes began in August 2002—driven by blatant misstatements by Cheney, Rice and Bush, not by Clinton. At the same time, we heard that Saddam’s UAVs could deliver chem and bio to this country—and we heard that Saddam would surely do so if he could. (Just look at his role in September 11!) Bill Clinton didn’t say these things—these things were said by Bush/Cheney/Rice. And these were the claims, in the fall of 02, which actually took the nation to war. The claim that Saddam had WMD was not the claim which took us to war. It was the claims we’ve listed above—claims which were not made by Clinton.

Psuedo-Con Monkeys!

I am so tired of these liars in the "coporate media" but the good thing about it is that these media monkeys are starting to see the Bushies for the incompetent f**ks they are. The decision to invade Iraq has made the world less safe. Look at the wreckage left behind by the bombing of those hotels in Jordan last week. The perpetrators were not hardened al Qaeda veterans who learned to fight
in the Hindu Kush by killing Russians on behalf of the Reagan administration. The perpetrators were all Iraqis.
Mr. Bush's misbegotten adventure in Iraq has left the nest, and is spreading out into the wider world. The decision by Bush to use wildly questionable sources in order to scare the American people into supporting
the war has been a great aid and comfort to those who now kill American soldiers so far from home.
In other words, did Bush do exactly, precisely what Osama bin Laden wanted him to?

There's no doubt that Bush handled all of this in exactly the wrong way.
After 9-11, love for America poured in from around the globe and Osama was universally hated.
Three years later, Osama and Al Qaeda are stronger than ever and America is universally despised.
Only one man had the power to make Osama a world player and Bush played his part perfectly,
this is if you're Osama trying to prove that America is a sex-obsessed land of Arab-hating torturers.

Monday, November 14, 2005

Kick'em In The Dick!

Hey this is what happens when stupid people collectively get together and screw up!

In March, 2003, Bush, in perhaps the greatest strategic blunder in U.S. history, invaded an Arab nation that had not
attacked us, did not want war with us, and did not threaten us—to strip it of weapons we now know it did not have.
Result: Shia and Kurds have been liberated from Saddam, but Iran has a new ally in southern Iraq, Osama has a
new base camp in the Sunni Triangle, the Arab and Islamic world have been radicalized against the United States,
and copy-cat killers of Al Qaida have been targeting our remaining allies in Europe and the Middle East: Spain, Britain,
Egypt and Jordan.
And, lest we forget, 2055 Americans are dead and Walter Reed is filling up.

Thanks Mr. Bush and President Cheney.

Suffer No Fools Gladly!

Recently I engaged in a debate with someone who I thought at the time knew what they were talking about. Well, that was not the case. This guy was so dense and stupid that I should have disengaged at the sight of the red flag but I did not. This dumbf**k actually said that "scientific theory" and "theory" (used in common parlance) are one and the same. Oh why did his mom not go to the local abortion doctor for a session.

Well he is also a neo-con..... surprised? Here is some interesting reading I think you will like.

It is increasingly apparent that there is an important ideological conflict going on in the modern
conservative movement between supporters of increased state power and supporters of limited government.

The conflict pits the Bush Republicans against traditional conservatives. While both groups give lip service
to the term limited government and use the same “conservative” label, they are very different creatures.
The Bush Republicans advocate a “neo-con” approach to state power that critics fear is a potential creeping
fascist ideology disguised as conservatism. Secret prisons, torture and unlimited detention in prisons without trial
are all examples of policies supported by the Bush Republican that outrage both traditional conservatives and civil libertarians.
Traditional conservatives rely on the rule of law instead of personal rule by a strong leader or leadership group.
The Bush Republicans seem to believe that anything the Bush Administration wants to do should be permitted
because they claim that they should be trusted not to abuse the power of their offices.
Traditional conservatives believe that the system of checks and balances should be strong enough to survive good
or bad White House or Congressional leaders. The Bush Republicans seem to view the checks and balances system
devised by our Founding Fathers as obstacles to imposing their views on our government and nation.


Most Americams - 57 percent - said they think Bush is a dishonest bastard.
Just over four in 10 say Bush is honest. Whites, Southerners, evangelicals, racial bigots,
the uneducated and the religiously-insane, were most likely to believe Bush is honest.
Bush, who promised "honor and integrity," has ordered his entire staff to attend ethics classes in an
attempt to fool the blind and the stupid into thinking he's clean, but his staff is full of treasonous traitors.
The president gets credit from a majority for being strong and decisive, but he's also known for
getting everything completely f-ing wrong, so his stubbornness is dragging the country down with him.

Friday, November 11, 2005

Whose been smoking Crack?

Well it seems that the Kansas Board adopted those new scientific standards guaranteeing
that we in Colonial Kansas are moving backwards. Wow how I long to have gutsey people like in Dover Delaware that told their little bible thumpers to fuck off and ran their stupid asses off the board on a rail! And then Pat Roberston(R-Lying Crazy Fucker) responded by telling these people that god basically does not like them so do not call on him. This idiots should be ran out of town on a rail we need to be more aggressive when it comes to these bottom feeders. I like these quotes. In a nutshell
fellow freethinkers remember this.


"All we are is dust in the wind."
- Kansas

"Gravity isn't real and dinosaurs are dragons from Hell."
- The Other Kansas

If Katrina and Iraq woke-up a politically sleepy nation to the horrors of neocon rule,
let us hope what Kansas has done to their children exposes the extreme danger of the Rapture Right.

In a 6-4 ruling on Tuesday, the Kansas School Board has paved the way for Creationism to be taught,
not in a comparative religion class, but as hard science.

Science is the study of the Natural World. Creationism is the study of the Supernatural World.

The US is chronically embarrassed by our pathetic math and science ranking in the world.
More and more of our postgraduate research slots are being awarded to foreign students for lack of
qualified or interested Americans. And as we enter the "century of biology," we are condemning
ourselves to myth and magic while other nations simply pass us by.

Although, there are some signs of hope. Also on Tuesday, the people of Pennsylvania
sent all the Flat-Earth freaks on their school board packing.

Get involved, stay informed and do the right thing even when no one is looking.
We get but one chance to raise our kids.



"Sixty four percent of Americans think Dumb Bush is doing a bad job,
The other 34 percent think Adam and Eve rode dinosaurs to Church."

That's as funny as it is scary.

The only people who still trust Bush are the religiously insane.
Even the greedy oil billionaires probably wish Bush was smart enough to help those poor people
who died in New Orleans, but then again, it was only about 1,000 - and they were poor and black
- so who cares, right?

Saturday, November 05, 2005

MY SISTER KIM!

My sister Kim lives in Colorado. She is a wonderful human being and I would say that even if she was not related to me(Big Daddy). So why am I talking about my sister Kim you may ask? Let me put it to you this way,we have political conversations and the more we talk the more I come to really believe she is a closet republican. Now keep in mind there is nothing wrong in my mind with being a republican closeted or otherwise. Here is what I find fascinating about her. She hates Limbaugh(rightfully so) and Hannity(no brainer)but LOVES Bill O'Reilly. What???? Plus she voted for Bush. I mean although she voted for the talking coke monkey I can forgive her for that. But O'Reilly I mean come on. But she is steadfast in her support for O'Reilly and here is the worse part when she is defending her man O'reilly she does it in an intelligent,direct, lucid, almost ireverent way and we she talks about the liberal media reminds me of someone else I know............Me! I always thought I was one of kind but I be damned there is another voice out there who is just as stubborn,irreverent,verbose, and sounds just like me.

Lets pray that my sister does not get her own radio show I would hate the competition.

Friday, November 04, 2005

RETURN OF PROFESSOR W .

Hey guys I just talked with Professor W just a few minutes ago.
He will return to the show on mon for a few weeks until the Christmas holidays then he leaves for Costa Rica for 6 months to help his family.We will cover everything that happened politically in the last few months. Believe me you do not want to miss this weeks Wavestation X.

Things that make you go, Hmmmm?

I will add this regularly to the blog. These are just thinkoids that will enrich your world knowledge. Its also a promise I made to the late Steve Allen when I last met with him in New York circa 1995. Get his Book "Dumbth and 81 Ways To Make Americans Smarter".

"Did you know that intelligent people have more zinc and copper in their hair."


(No Bush jokes here lol)

To All Republicans.....(Bitch Better Have My Money!)

Hey Folks although I have never been a Democrat. I must say that Harry Reid has been kicking Republican ass(which is always a good thing). So I want all you WSX listeners to call Harry Reid's DC office and tell him or his staff that he is doing a great job! Also tell them their boss's pimp hand is strong.
It's about damn time a Democrat showed some balls and bitch slaps those Neo-Con Republican bitches.
The Republicans are going to try to destroy Reid over this.
- Reid's phone number: (202) 224-3542.



Bill Maher made a good point on his last show when he said the following.

"The Party of Fascists investigated Clinton to see if he got Monica a job.
Horrors! The President tried to get a girl a job at Revlon?
So what does Bush do?
He tries to give his secretary a lifetime job on the Supreme Court - and that's
OK?"

These Ballsy Politcians!

Wow these Democrats have the Republicans crying like bitches with the nomination delay with the Supreme Court and the closed door Senate meetings. I am loving every minute of this. I expected for these Republicans to name call and lie their way outta this and they are. Michelle Malkin(R- Lying Bitch)wrote a new book. This woman needs to crawl up somewhere and take her medicine. Hey back to the crybabies here is a quote from Bill Frist concerning this closed session. Check out the link read it and enjoy it. And believe me President Katrina and Roves problems are not over yet. Oh by the way Bush's polls numbers are at 37% the lowest of his fake presidency. Now do not let lying Rush tell you any different. Talk at cha later!

"The Senate has been hijacked by the Democratic leadership! Never, have I been slapped in the face with such an affront to the leadership of this grand institution. They have no conviction. They have no principles. They have no ideas. This is a pure stunt. This is an affront to me personally. It's an affront to our leadership. It's an affront to the United States! Harrump, harrump, harrump[, harrump ...for the next year and a half, I can't trust Senator Reid."

-- Crybaby Billy Frist, throwing a tantrum because Harry Reid grew a pair of balls.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/01/AR2005110102068.html

"Random Thoughts From A Sidekick"

1) Rosa Parks passed away last week(10/24 to 10/28) "God Bless You
Ms. Parks and Thank You."



2) "WHY IS LEAKING THE NAME OF A CIA AGENT A BAD THING??"


(Warning: If you are a neo/conservative or just a
blind BUSH loving moron you just won't like this part)

Valarie Flame who is the wife of Joe Wilson was
outed by someone in the Bush administration. That damage put her life,her
family and various contacts that she made in danger. She
was working on gathering info on WMD's so that (Mushroom Cloud don't happen
in a american city..) Ms. Flame hadn't told anyone
either in her family,friends that she was a spy. (check out Patrick
Fitzgerald's press confrence on Fri 10/28/2005..) Robert Novak

also ran a story that leaked the dummy CIA created company that Flame was using to use as cover for her work. Other agents was using that same company to provide another layer of cover for them so that is out there too. Oh Ms. Flame was working on


gathering intel for WMD's and Nuclear purchases from other countries and
the bad guys
MORAL OF THE STORY: We have heard a lot of things
about Joe Wilson's claims and the fact that he was lying and pumping
his own self up. But lets keep our focus on what is going on that someone
outed a CIA agent because
they didn't like what her husband said about this governments plans to
sending troops to Iraq. Sorry I
take TREASON a little bit SERIOUSLY.......................



3) I Love Jon Stewart and Steve Colbert work on the fake
news shows (THE DAILY SHOW and THE COLBERT REPORT). They are keeping me sane and is putting the news media on notice by making fun of them. Steve Colbert makes fun of Bill O'Reilly trife he does on Fox News and his radio show.


4) Sean Hannity, Laura Ingram,Mike Savage, Rush
Limbaugh,Ann Coulter ( 5 reasons why abortion should be legal....)




Later

Monday, October 31, 2005

WHAT A TANGLED WEB WE WEAVE.

Well it looks like the Bushies have screwed the pooch on this one.
Libby getting indicted and believe me more will follow. Miers got shafted.
And the Neocons are on the defensive. They are adopting the same strategy the Clinton administration. Tonight on the show supreme court pick,Gay Mr.Sulu, Russian shooting,
Craddock the racist republican plus more.

These neo-cons are really showing their hypocrisy. Please everyone enjoy it.

UPDATES ARE COMING

Sorry with so much going I have not had a chance to do posts but I will post new stuff here in the next few hours.

Monday, October 24, 2005

The Show

Topic for tonights show

Indictments are coming.
Neo-cons are running like scared bitch.
Hurricane Wilma
Police shoot man with knife.


Plase tune in and listen in 90.1 FM KKFI Wavestation X Evil Genius

Saturday, October 22, 2005

Neo Cons are running scared!

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

"Some Random Thoughts From John (Sidekick Extraordinaire)"

1.. Watching tonights episode of "Hannity and Colmes" I seemed to notice that
Sean isn't in the Fox Studio's with Alan. Wild theory!
But could it be that Alan is sick of the smell from Sean Hannity's
head because it is in the Bush Administration's collective "ASSES"
and he finally complained about it?


2.. Who is the most annoying callers to WavestationX???? I have three in
no particular order....

"Fairway Mike" a longtime listener and caller to talk radio in K.C.
who always prove you can talk a lot but have nothing really to say.


"Russ" He claims he is a "Libertarian Anarchist" he
is waiting for society to fall apart because of all the legal/illegal
immigration that comes into the USA(mostly its ok that Russ wants to bring over a Russian Girl to I guess to marry him, but it isn't ok for anyone
of color to come in the country because damn, its just bringing us down. He has it all figured out and the rest of us are suckers....

"Racist George" I met this guy a couple of times and he is also
a longtime caller of talk radio in KC. George is a racist
but he is the type that is racist with a soft fuzzy side .. (he is a evironmentalist) He just want the "master race" to control it all. My experience with racists is that they are in a lot of ways lazy and real dysfunctional people(George has over 100 hours of college credit with no degree and this is the fault of minorites)who never accomplished anything. Look in the mirror George that is the real culprit to your existence.



3.. George Carlin once said when he was called to cynical about things
that he thinks of himself as a "desolutional idealist".
I am far from that area but it amazes me that we have some of the
dumbest people it seem running the country and it seems that some of us surrender the ability to ask questions and challenge people who are in authority.. Question it
all the time because if you don't, you get "GEORGE W. BUSH".


Later to Blogger Dudes and Duddette's.

Thursday, October 13, 2005

Bush affirmative action! Why don't we stack the Judicial Deck.

This posting below is from my good friend John Tackett.




James Dobson "Focus On The Family" announced on his radio show that the Federal
Courts should follow the will of the american people and put christans on the federal courts. (HUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUH???)

The Federal Judicary should follow the Constitution and not the petty
fantasies of ideologues like James Dobson. The Federal
Courts have to be independent of the executive and legislative branches of our
national goverment. They follow the constituion so it is fair to all americans.

The Courts shouldn't have Judges that are just christian, that is not the
point of the matter. See Dobson and the rest of his nutty ilk
believe in "Judical Activism" and legislating from the bench whenever it fits their
agenda.(What do you call the selection in 2000 of George W. Bush as President??? ) When it doesn't fit then they cry "JUDICAL ACTIVISM".

They confuse what is going on in the courts and thats why our President
nominates "Rachel Dratch from Saturday Night Live"
Oh! I mean Harriet Meirs to the Supreme Court of the United States of
America.. (are you kidding me????) Let me guess this is Bush Affirmative Action for his buddies???.


John (:sidekick to the evil genius)

Wednesday, October 12, 2005

Quotes!

"And what this man who grew up in wealth and privilege considers good for poor
Muslims is that they become killers and suicide bombers. He assures them that
is the road to paradise - though he never offers to go along for the ride."
--Dubya, who grew up in wealth and privilege, telling our soldiers to "stay the course on"


"Bush feels that God has asked him to invade Iraq. I don't know what else
God has told him. We may be one of the countries invaded if God whispers,
'Please, Bush -- invade Malaysia'."
-- Former Malaysian PM Mahathir Mohamad,

Oh and this one is my favorite one of all. I mean this just proves how intellectually inflexible these people are. Openminded people change their minds in the way of new and convincing evidence, its called LEARNING! Now dolts with a provincial outlook are called Neo-cons and closed minded, whether you are on the right or left. Smart people change their minds when necessary. Keep this in mind this is the same woman who said Bush is the most brilliant man she has ever met.What the F**CK.......! This statement is tantamount to when Mrs Whitney Houston(crack is whack)was obviously high when she said that Bobby Brown(druggie)was the king of R&B.
What!! All of you people join me a collective,this... bitch.... is... high! Chant.
So this is what I think of dear old Harriet Miers,she was the head of the scratchers tickets lottery.

"I know her well enough to be able to say that she's not going to change,
that 20 years from now she'll be the same person with the same philosophy
that she is today. I don't want to put somebody on the bench who is this way
today, and changes. That's not what I'm interested in."
-- The Talking Monkey President.

PUDDING HEAD BUSH!!

I am sorry or is just me but everytime I hear Bush speak in public,I swear I feel very sad that america has a minimally exceptional president. Just to watch him torture himself to remember the latest lies he is supposed to have memorized is in itself quite sad and funny. But what if Bush had a brain fart and started being honest(a la'Bullworth) This is what his speech would be like if the dolt had a smattering of decency in him.


It is hard to even imagine what George W. Bush would have to say if he were serious about “leveling with the American people” over the Iraq War. Here is a draft that would surely not get past the White House speechwriters:

“My fellow Americans, let me explain to you what really went wrong with the Iraq policy and why so many young Americans have died in what looks like a futile war without end.

“First, you must know that I have long obsessed about getting rid of Saddam Hussein, taking care of some unfinished business from my dad’s presidency. There’s also a lot of oil there and my neoconservative advisers wanted to project American power into the Middle East.

“So when the Sept. 11 attacks occurred, I saw my chance. Vice President Dick Cheney and I began merging references to al-Qaeda and Iraq. That way, the casual listener would start associating Iraq with Sept. 11 subliminally, even if there was no real evidence to support that connection.

“We also decided to exaggerate the shaky intelligence we had about Iraq’s WMD because we knew that would scare the American people into supporting a war against a country that wasn’t threatening us.

“Next, I got rid of officials, like Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill and Gen. Eric Shinseki, who had doubts about the Iraq War plans. To keep British Prime Minister Tony Blair on board, we agreed to go to the United Nations, but only because we hoped that Saddam would reject a demand for U.N. inspections and give us a better pretext for war.

“When Saddam crossed us up by letting the inspectors in, we started a war hysteria inside the United States. When the French wanted more time for the inspections to work, we turned ‘France’ into a dirty word, even renaming French toast and French fries into ‘freedom toast’ and ‘freedom fries.’

“Before it sank into the American people that the U.N. inspectors weren’t finding any WMD, I forced the inspectors to leave. Later, after the war was over, when your memories were getting a little fuzzy, I pretended that Hussein had never let the inspectors in and had shown ‘defiance,’ leaving me no choice but to invade as a ‘last resort.’ For details on how I pulled off that sleight of hand, see Consortiumnews.com’s ‘President Bush, With the Candlestick…’

“In the first days of the Iraq War, when we realized ‘shock and awe’ didn’t have quite the effect we hoped, I had the U.S. military bomb civilian targets, such as a residential restaurant which we obliterated because of some sketchy information that Saddam might be eating there. We did this even though we knew that civilians would be killed. We were right about the civilians getting killed, but Saddam turned out not to be there.

“All these acts that I’ve described to you tonight might well be considered war crimes, but I really don’t care much about international law. Remember when I reacted to one question about international law by joking, ‘International law? I better call my lawyer.’ That’s just the way I feel about treaties and other things that try to tie me down.

“Some of my critics might say that I’ve been a dissembler, which means someone who doesn’t tell the truth. But that’s just politics.

“Well, so now that I’ve leveled with you about how we got into this mess, I’m sure you feel you can trust me to continue protecting the American people and leading our great nation to victory in Iraq.

“As I actually did say in my radio address on June 18, ‘I’ll continue to act to keep our people safe from harm and our future bright. Together we will do what Americans have always done: build a better and more peaceful world for our children and grandchildren.’
Ah! Hope springs eternal.

Monday, October 10, 2005

WAVESTATION X SHOW

I was angry at that footage in New Orleans of that 64 year old man being beaten by the cops. That was uncalled for and that will be one of the topics on tonights show

Harriet Miers
Karl Rove indicted
Doctor tricks woman into sex.

Friday, October 07, 2005

I LOVE OPRAH 97% WORTH!!

I was watching Oprah the other day(do not ask me why). The cast from my favorite movie "Crash" was on. Well this expert threw out this figure on crime concerning inter-racial verses intra-racial and discovered this. That both blacks and whites count for 3% of crimes inter-racially and that each group intra-racially counts for 97% of crimes.
So that means that despite a lot of racial beliefs, black men are not raping or robbing white women or people at an alarming rate and vice versa. So basically whites are killing there own at an alarming rate and blacks are killing each other at an alarming rate. I did a show on this a few years ago. It was good to see this again.
But yet the media keeps this black on black crime bullsh*t going. Well cultures from all over the world kill each other. Would you believe and be shocked that in China, chinese people kill chinese people or that in Italy, italians kill italians. So you never hear the media describe that as "chinese on chinese" or "italian on italian" or "white on white crime". The term implies that no other racial groups kill each other. So you now know how absurd the term "black on black crime" is. So why does the media do this, I mean surely a liberal media would be fair and not perpetrate this lie ,right! I will start using the term and you use it also(white on white crime) until this foolishness stops.

OMIGOSH!! ANOTHER TERRORIST WARNING. NOT!!!!

Okay here we go again. Can you believe this sh*t. We have another fake terrorist warning. Now because of an arrest in Iraq the other day an "insurgent" admitted that 19 operatives were coming to New York or already there with briefcases to bomb New Yorks subway system. Oh Anthony say it ain't true. Well its not. Here is my evil reasoning behind this.. Tom Ridge admitted that the past terror alerts were used by the Bush administration for political reasons and that he thought they were stupid. We all remember those vague alerts that systematically came out that warned there were no specific targets but be on alert. What? And also we have a president with low polling numbers and there was a spy (a f**king spy) found in the White House and Karl Rove(Turd Blossom) is testilying Oops! I meant to say testifying concerning the Valerie Plame affair and there is word in Washington that there are about to be 22 indictments handed down. It also seems the White House is distancing Bush from Rove. Plus the President gave an interesting speech mentioned Bin Laden by name and would you believe that hours later we get a specific terror alert that has New York on edge. But meanwhile the Dept. Of Homeland Security claims that these threats are not credible,Huh? So what is a person to do? STOP THE INSANITY!!! Could this be what magicians call misdirection. I mean this is what they accused Clinton of, concerning blowjob gate. So he lobbed missiles at the Sudan to throw attention off of him.Could this be what is happening folks? I mean even the events of the arrests does not sound plausible. I am flying to New York in a few hours and will let you guys know the events there. If I get bombed in the subways I am turning the show over to Dennis and Darcy and John(bastard) and they will carry on the Wavestation X legacy. But as I sneakily suspect I will return to the show on monday to afflict the comfortable and comfort the afflicted. Oh by the way did anyone watch the Ann Coulter and Bill O'reilly shoot out the other day. O'reilly kicked her ass! This was concerning the Miers nomination. It seems that some neo-cons are turning against Bush! Its good to see the right wing truimph of the extreme right wing, and thats why I love this country!!

Monday, October 03, 2005

WAVESTATION X SHOW !!

Okay tonight will be a great show. But before I start, I want to blame the last two Chiefs losses on my dear friend John Tackett. Now you say what does John have to do with the way they played.....well he don't, but its never stopped me before for blaming things on him(plus he is a Chiefs fan). Okay let me put the joint down for a second and get to this blog.

On tonights show :
Tom Delay

New justice
Bill(blackie)Bennett
Bush the King
Green cards for Booty
Ashton Kutcher?Demi Moore(Why I think they will break up soon)
Eminent Domain in Florida.


Hey here is what the neo-con Rush forgot to tell us about Delay(Rush was to high to tell people about this). He deserves the Larry Johnson Bitch slap. See you guys tonight!




The Real Tom DeLay Story


The real story about Tom DeLay’s indictment in Texas goes far beyond the corrupt
acts of a single individual. DeLay’s intervention in Texas state legislative elections was
part of a concerted, nationwide Republican plan to control our government through
political gerrymandering at the expense of black and Hispanic voters. I observed this
process first hand as the expert witness for Democrats in the court cases challenging
Republican congressional redistricting plans not only in Texas, but also in Pennsylvania,
Florida, Ohio, and Michigan.
These latter four states are equally divided between Republicans and Democrats,
yet Republican gerrymandering has resulted in GOP control of about two-thirds of
their congressional seats.
By pumping money into state legislative races in Texas, DeLay engineered Republican
control in 2002 over a previously divided state legislature. He then guided Texas
lawmakers into breaking precedent by rewriting mid-decade an established congressional redistricting plan. The DeLay plan thwarted the will of voters by drawing districts to
guarantee Republican victories and take over five Democratic seats. To this end,
DeLay and his allies cynically and knowingly destroyed the voting rights of millions
of African-Americans and Hispanics in Texas.
In the Dallas County area, the plan demolished a 60.5 percent minority district and
scattered its voters into five Anglo-dominated, Republican districts in which they have
no chance to influence the outcomes of elections. In southwest Texas, DeLay’s plan
removed some 90,000 Hispanics from Congressional District 23 to ensure that it
would elect a Republican opposed by Hispanic voters. His plan dismantled seven other congressional districts across Texas in which African-American and Hispanic voters
critically influenced election outcomes, submerging these voters into heavily Republican
districts in which they have no influence.
The big corporate interests behind Tom DeLay knew full well what they bought in Texas.
They bought our government. Absent DeLay’s gerrymandering, the Democrats, not
Republicans, would have picked up congressional seats nationally in 2004, putting
Democrats in a much better position to regain control of Congress next year.

Saturday, October 01, 2005

DAMN THAT DELAY!!

Well it seems that Tom Delay is in a little bit of trouble. Well I heard Rush Limbaugh say that it is no big deal and it is a partisan venture. I mean I am glad Rush set my mind at ease and I am glad that republicans have never did anything partisan to democrats. Yep that Delay is such a victim. So Limbaugh claims there is no proof of these indictments at all concerning Delay hmmmmm... But Limbaugh said during the Iran-Contra scandal that there was not one conviction at all in that scandal.Hmmm what a lying bitch, the fact is that there were 14 count them 14 convictions in the scandal so Limbaugh has a tendency to LIE just like he is now. But dyed in the wool neo-cons who have not seen these documents listen to Hannity and Limbaugh and just parrots the same party line. So sad that these brainless neo-cons that listens to these guys do so because they do not know what to think for themselves. So the next time you hear one of these anti-science,parroting neo-cons tell them that until they see the evidence for themselves then SHUT THE FUCK UP!!! Now I know this entry will make neo-cons angry good FUCK'EM!!! And think for your self.