For Whom The Ban Tolls.

Okay the kneejerk reactionists are at it again and so stupidly playing into the hands of the neo-cons. The latest installment to the cultural trainwreck known as Ann Coulter,is that some NewJersey democrats are trying to get her book banned from bookstores. This is a stupid move on the part of the left because now they are parotting the same behavior usually reserved by rightwingers, to shut out any dissenting voice(who do they think they are Fox News and the Bush administration). Your humble libertarian servant the Evil Genius feels that no matter how morally repugnant and wrong and hypocritical Ms.Coulter is, she deserves the right to free speech. Now I have the right not to buy her book or listen to her but I will never and "we" should never try to shut her up. I do not agree with Ann but I will defend her right to say what she says because if its Ann today it will be us tomorrow.
Even though she said this last year, "Liberals are always accusing us of repressing their speech. I say let's do it. Let's repress them. ... Frankly, I'm not a big fan of the First Amendment," Coulter said during an Oct. 21, 2005, speech at the University of Florida. Well.....lets be better than her.

EVIL GENIUS RETURNS FOR GOOD!

Thats right I return to the airwaves permanently next mon

The Coultergeist!

Yeah I know this picture is extreme but so is Coulter
Okay I know we all saw the Matt Lauer and the Tucker Carlson interview with Ann Coulter. I know that she upsets a lot of people with her comments. But you can't let people like Ann upset you. I watched the exchange between Ann and Lauer and I also give Carlson credit for calling her on her brutal invectives concerning the 9-11 widows. Here is what it boils down to. She is trying to sell her book. I have read her past books and those books do not make sense. When I see her, I see a very disturbed individual. Let me say that Coulter is just like O'Reilly, they build a "strawman"(liberal) and then attack it. You see, they could not attack what real liberalism is because then the world would see that they are full of it. You see, when Coulter uses words like "liberal infallibility" her red meat base will eat it up and start using the term to sound somewhat intelligent. But the truth is there is no such thing as "liberal infallibility" she made it up like she does everything else hence the "Strawman" effect. I will give you another example of her lies. You see Coulter is a pathological liar when she said that they are not allowed to respond to victims who criticize the president or republicans, well she implied this lie when she said to Matt Lauer, Coulter: "To speak out using the fact they are widows. This is the left’s doctrine of infallibility. If they have a point to make about the 9-11 commission, about how to fight the war on terrorism, how about sending in somebody we are allowed to respond to. No. No. No. We have to respond to someone who had a family member die. Because then if we respond, oh you are questioning their authenticity"

But here is the interesting part. There has not been not one time that Limbaugh. Malkin,Carlson,any myrmidon on Fox News, O'reilly,Drudge,Savage has not critcized Cindy Sheehan and the 9-11 widows, hell they do it all the time, so what in the hell is she talking about? Now Bill O'reilly has said she makes a point, but she only makes a point if no one on the right has criticized the people, but they have!

Ann Coulter is a liar and probably mentally ill because what other kind of person would behave in this fashion. Lets hope she takes her medicine.

Flashes of thought in the Darkness of my mind Again

Hey guys I just thought of this listen up. It never hurts to follow the money.
If global warming is a myth, then why are insurance companies dropping flood coverage?
They seem to think these storms are getting worse and the odds are against them
More insurance means more profits, but they dropped those policies because
they would have to pay a penalty for ignoring the facts - while Bush is free to.

Crooked is as Crooked does!

Well it seems that this democrat William Jefferson might have taken some money that he shouldn't have. I mean the authorities found ninety thousand dollars in foil in his freezer. Now either that money is illegal or thats his new piggy bank. If he is guilty then he needs to go to prison,. But here is the interesting part, he is being protected by all people the Republicans. Why? I'll tell you why,you see there is a federal investigation going on and the focus of this investigation are republicans! So they do not want the government violating their privacy. Hmmm lets see...its okay to conduct illegal wiretaps with out warrants and lets see you can start an illegal war with the wrong country on trumped up charges but you can not raid the offices of a crooked congressman because you would be violating his rights. What? Did I hear that right! Their rights, Bull! They are not above the law and this does not violate the constitution.

You see folks,in the seventies the Supreme decided that bribery was not part of the legislative process so lets go get these bastards!

You gotta let a Ho be a Ho!

Boy I'll tell ya these neo-cons are something else. They claim they are the party of principle. Right! It seems there have been booty calls and favors and money and votes exchanging places. And these are the same people who trashed Clinton for a sex romp. Whew!! Someone smells like they need an autopsy.

Holla at ya later.

Makes you wonder, Huh?

These bastards just keep letting this stuff happen it turns out that
Bush ignored hard evidence from top intelligence officials between April and September of 2001 about an impending attacks on U.S. soil. Why? If Bush really wanted Bin Laden, he blew SEVERAL opportunities.One of them in July, prior to 9-11. The Guardian and the French newspaper Le Figaro reported that bin Laden received dialysis treatment for a period of some 10 days at the American hospital in Dubai, and while there,he was visited by a local CIA agent. It was also about this time that U.S. State Department officials were threatening Afghanistan with carpet bombing if the Taliban didn't come to terms on the proposed Unocal pipeline across Afghanistan.
Bush had other opportunities to seize bin Laden but didn't.
See: Alexander Cockburn: Bush was offered bin Laden and Blew It.
Keep in mind, when the CIA was reported to have visited bin Laden in Dubai, 9-11 had not happened. But, already the Bush State Department was spoiling for a war. All it needed was a pretext that the gullible American public would buy! It got it —conveniently —on 9-11! I tell you folks its time to wake up!

Bizzarro World

Okay Bush made sense last night about immigration. I mean I have been saying all along there will be no massive deportation of anyone. Now this does not go over well with the rank in file misguided extra chromosome conservatives. Well the upside of this is the Presidents polls are low and the neo-cons hacks are pretending that do not notice.Because Rush Limbaugh(Rep-drug addict,liar) actually said "I think that there is something funny about these polls folks" Yeah right if Bush's name was Clinton this would be a different story. Wow talk radio has gotten really sad. More later.

Weapon of Mass Distraction!

Okay I so tired of hearing about Britney Spears and this kid situation and Natalie Holloway and if I hear one more thing about the Catholic church and the Da Vinci code. I mean every one is acting like this stuff is really important. This does not need to garner the attention of Americans. I mean if we must be distracted by something then why not be distracted by things I would like to see, like the picture in this caption. Now I want you guys to meet the proud receipient of the republican estate tax and screw you give away welfare program. You see a lot of you hypocrites will take offense of this photo...good because I find it equally obscene that we allow ourselves to be distracted by B.S. I mean come on you must admit my distraction is better right? Oh yeah feel free to click on the photo once or twice for a better shot. Snooches!

I just thought this was funny.

I loved this picture and I thought it was funny.

Privacy, Huh?

I want us all to take a good look at that
caption. The neo-cons tell us that they hate us
for our freedoms. Well hell what freedoms? When Americans are giving up their freedoms little by little to feel more safe.

How the Republicans love you!

I would be remiss in my duties if I did not give you these facts about the estate tax.
You see Republicans lie, OOPS! I mean they have not been very honest about the estate tax or as they call it on Fox news "The Death Tax". You see Republican president Abraham Lincoln saw fit to have this tax(they will not tell you this on Fox News) and Republican sex cop Bill O'reilly won't tell you the whole story(talk about spin). Thats why I am here. Now keep in mind I am a capitalist pig, but I feel a need to spread the gospel of Anthony to the teeming masses. You see Republicans will tell you they are against taxes, but they forget to tell you they are against taxes for the rich and not the poor. Oh Anthony stop it, you are a trouble maker and the Republicans care about us. Okay lets do something really strange and actually look at their record. The Republicans have cut capital gains taxes and dividend taxes and the estate tax. Now remember the estate tax is paid by only about 1 percent of the wealthiest of the population just 1%. The other taxes I mentioned are paid by 9.5 per cent of people. Now here is the clincher the Republicans have never cut payroll taxes and thats paid by 75% of Americans. So its okay for you to work your ass off and get screwed in taxes the more you make the more you get taxed sometimes you have to work two jobs. But Paris Hilton who never worked a day in her life should get her inheritance money tax free so she can fund her drinking and sexcrazed lifestyle. You see the Republicans use a strategy you see all the time in sports stadiums you know how sports fans have no lives because if they did they would not paint their faces blue and red and yellow. But they used a collective mentality to get people to sympathize with them,its called the "you can be rich too trick". So just like sports fans who would like to be these athletes they pay money to see to watch these rich guys play ball,but they can never be them so they watch in awe like serfs and yearn to be like Mike. See my point! You see Republicans are against distribution of wealth when it goes downward,but when distribution of wealth goes upwards, Oh they love it, see its just a matter of direction. Whose your Daddy? To drive it home further here are some more facts. Have a nice day.

* It’s a tax only on the wealthiest Americans: the estates of 98 of every 100 people who die face no estate tax whatsoever. Current law contains protections for family farms and businesses. The exemption for individual estates, now $675,000, is set to rise to $1 million by 2006. The exemption for couples, now $1.35 million, is set to rise to $2 million. Spouses can inherit estates of any size without any tax liability.

* The wealthiest multimillionaire families would get a giant tax break. Charles Davenport, a tax expert at Rutgers University, says that repealing the tax would mean an average $7 million tax cut for the top one-tenth of one percent of families (New York Times, July 16, 2000).

* The estate tax is not double taxation. A majority of the value of the largest estates have never been subject to taxation. In fact, when a person dies, the gains on assets such as stocks, bonds, houses and other real estate that have never been sold (unrealized capital gains) are not subject to capital gains taxation. Heirs inherit the assets at their full, appreciated value. Without the estate tax, those gains would remain untaxed forever.

* In 2000, the federal estate tax is expected to raise $27 billion in 2000. That's more than double the total amount of federal income taxes paid by the bottom half of all taxpayers. According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, repealing the estate tax would be very costly—$105 billion over the first 10 years, as it phases in slowly, and nearly $50 billion a year once it was fully in effect. The cost of repeal in the second 10 years—from 2011 to 2020—would be at least $620 billion, over half a trillion dollars! What would be cut to make up this lost revenue? Education, Food Stamps, Medicare, Social Security? Or would taxes be raised on low- and middle-income Americans?

* No estate tax is due on funds bequeathed to charities. In 1997, more than 15,500 estates took advantage of this provision, making donations worth more than $14 billion. Experts say charities would lose substantially after a repeal.

* The average effective estate tax rate (after all exemptions and deductions) is not 55 percent (the top marginal rate), but a modest 17 percent of the gross value of the estates. That’s less than the income tax rate paid by many middle Americans.

"Estate tax repeal would accelerate America’s drift towards economic apartheid. Why eliminate a tax that targets only America’s wealthiest families, encourages charitable giving, expands green space through bequests to conservation land trusts, and promotes America's core economic and democratic values?

—Chuck Collins, co-director of United for a Fair Economy and
co-author of Economic Apartheid in America (New Press, 2000).

Fight them over there my ass!

Okay folks I know you heard about these NSA wire taps that I have been complaining about. You see I was right all along, Bush can not give a straight answer on this and neo-cons myrmidons(look it up) are falling right in line with there cult leader.
Bush did not confirm or deny(important point right here) that the NSA was collecting records of tens of millions of ordinary Americans' phone calls. I mean how hard is to say no we are not collecting ordinary americans phone records(see I just did it). Anyway he goes on to say: "Our intelligence activities strictly target al-Qaida and their known affiliates," Bush said. "We're not mining or trolling through the personal lives of millions of innocent Americans." Here is the Evil ones problem with that phrase,look at the words they prepared for him. They "target" Al Qaeda, but he refuses to say that no non-terrorists have been monitored(see my point).And he also keeps saying they target "known Al Qaeda associates." Does that mean there are tens of millions of Al Qaeda inside the United States? Anyone! Anyone!.......Bueller!
Bush also said that any domestic intelligence-gathering measures he's approved are "lawful," and he says "appropriate" members of Congress have been briefed.
The disclosure could complicate Bush's bid to confirm wiretapper Gen. Hayden as CIA director. Sure, the action is legal because Bush said it was, and anything Bush says is legal in "wartime." And maybe Congress was notified, but it's illegal for them to say what was said. If Bush says, "I killed two of Gannon's hookers last night," they can't reveal that. The companies that turned over records so far is AT&T Corp, Verizon Communications Inc., and BellSouth Corp. Quest is the only one with guts and a sense of being American(Although I think they are a Canadian company) who has not given anything up yet! I mean if they are a lot of Al Qaeda here, then that kicks all to hell that we fight them over there so we do not fight them over here lie, OOps! I mean speech. I mean if we know where they are arrest them! Right. Patrick Leahy was gargling something crazy in response to this and it sounded like "It's not one party's government. It's America's government. Those entrusted with great power have a duty to answer to Americans what they are doing," What a crazy guy!

Anthony's Laws!

Here are some truth of life rules I live by(well some of them)please feel free to peruse them.

Anthony's Law #1
Don't EVER tell the truth in a political campaign.
People want to be lied to. They don't care if you're the best, most qualified candidate in history, they're going to vote for a candidate who stars in a fuzzy video of him playing with the family dog while his pearlnecklaced wife and your 2.3 small children watch in awe while the voice-over dude explains that this guy has whatever-state-you-live-in family values. If you doubt me, ask President Walter Mondale about telling the truth. Now I know you say but Mondale was never president(exactly my point)honesty kicked him in the ass!!


Anthony's Law #2

Any time a person or entity makes a "mistake" that puts extra money (or power) in their pocket, expect them to make that "mistake" again and again and again. That's why refineries have fires now and then, because a fire allows them to scream "unexpected shortage" so they can gouge us on the price of gas.


Anthony's Law #3

Do not lay down in front of a bulldozer or a train or become a human shield.
The "president" of the United States will have you killed, rather than call off his bloody and profitable attack. Apparently, the Israeli government feels the same way about protestors in front of tanks.

That's one difference between our president and a Chinese tank commander.
In China, when that man stood in front of the tank in Tienneman Square, the tank stopped. In America and apparently, Israel, the "tank" keeps coming and crushes you.

Anthony's Law #4

Too much religion makes you stupid.
(Any questions about this one...just look around you.Just listen to their far
out views whether its exorcism,space aliens,Tom Cruise, Pat Robertson,George W.
I had a Mason tell me that the war was really about secret tablets in Saddams
home because it used to be called Babylon but he could not prove it to me
because its hidden in a secret Masonic Temple..Hmmm Any questions?)

Anthony's Law #5 -
Never get married(Americans only)
(I mean this one, just shack up and throw'em out when you are
done or get him/her to agree to some kind of term marriage)
Plus if you are on a date and they answer their cellphone, end the date right then
and there. This country has a 70% marriage failure rate and a 30% success rate if you are under the age of 45years old. Let me paint the sobering picture, would you ride in a car that had a 70% brake failure rate or fly a plane that had a 30% success rate of landing...well of course you would'nt, neither would I. But in spite of facts
we have a very high divorce rate and marriage rate...Damn evil marriage cartel.
(note some may take issue with Law#5 and will say thay I have commitment issues
nothing can be further from the truth, The commitment does not have anything to do with it(only truly desperate people pathetic people use that excuse).I am just against the way its practiced in America, it does not work. And if you are married and you disagree with this maxim.....see you in divorce court in a few years.)

Anthony's Law # 6
When having an affair,lie to your wife/husband never to the person on the side.
note: If you are a guy and having a torrid affair(just sex)remember if she has a nice body preferably a nice firm tush and legs,then that goes a long way to putting you in good standing with the LORD.




Anthony's Law #7

Never trust a politician.


Anthony's Law #8

No news outlet in America can be trusted

I have to admit it - they're all whores.
I can't name one network, one cable channel, one TV show, one newspaper or one magazine that can be trusted. They're crooked and they're lazy and they'll print any lie they choose to.The most honest news on all of TV is the "fake news" from The Daily Show with Jon Stewart - everybody else is lying.

If you want intergity, you have to turn to the internet where news and opinion can be stated without a corporate sponsor looking over your shoulder while you write, telling you, "Put this in your news and take that out."



Anthony's Law #9

Power isn't something that's given to you.
Power is something you f-ing take!


Anthony's Law #10

Lying to yourself is an unforgiveable crime.
You can lie to others, but lying to yourself makes no sense at all.
Like Shakespeare said, "to thine own self be true"


Anthony's Law #11
When having a true relationship(not an affair)
Only date people that you actually have something in common with. Do not date someone just because they are good looking and hot, believe me some hot women(male perspective) are shallow and stupid. For example: if your into god then they have to be into god.If you are a crackhead then they have to be a crackhead. Let Whitney and Bobby and Charlie and Denise be your guide.


Anthony's Law #12
Learn Science:
Believe me science is under attack in this country so get familiar with it.


Anthony's Law #13

Jimmy Carter was right - Life is not Fair.
Phillip Seymour Hoffman is 100 times the actor Tom Cruise is, but Cruise has
already made 100 times more money than Phillip Seymour Hoffman ever will.

The Beatles never won a Grammy,
Scorsese never won an Best Director Oscar
and Clinton was paid $200K to give us peace and prosperity while Bush
got paid $400 to Judas us into a never-ending spiral of terrorism, war and recession.

If Life was fair, JFK and RFK and MLK would've made speeches at DemoCon 2004,
but no, ..they were f-ing murdered by the other team, and we belong to the "plays fair" team.


Anthony's Law #14

Evolution is FACT! The jury is not out. The fact is most people are just stuck on stupid.(see Law #16)

Anthony's Law # 15

Help those less fortunate. I really mean this one, also help your fellow man when
ever possible.This country has seem to forgotten these people.For example look at Angelina Jolie she has not only walked the walk(adoption) but she has also helped focus attention on issues that this government would soon forget like Darfur.

Anthony's Law #16

Alot of people do not like FACTS. You see this everywhere on Fox News and on the right and left. people are generally insecure and think that they are always right. Thats why the word "Cognitive Dissonance" was coined. Just look at the reaction I will get from Law # 5. Plus be flexible in your beliefs, Always reevaluate your beliefs in the way of good and credible evidence.

Anthony's Law #17

Always stand your ground when you feel you are in the right and never let anyone disrepect you. Ever! Get in touch with your Alpha nature. This country is a nation of wimps.

Whoring is as Whoring does!

Hey guys check this out.
As a young lawyer in the mid-1990s, Brett Kavanaugh spent several years working on Ken Starr's never-ending witch hunt of Bill Clinton. In that role, he argued that the White House must open itself and its records including notes taken by Clinton's attorneys for examination by the independent counsel and his deputies(keep reading it gets better). But as an advisor to President Bush, Kavanaugh has taken the opposite view,zealously defending presidential prerogatives. Can you believe that crap. Its different when its the Bushies.... Well I guess that's what good whores do. They change their position constantly to please their tricks.

Prepared to get Snowed in!

I accidently erased the last entry so here it goes. The President using bad sophistry told america a lie. Concerning the big profits oil companies are making he actually said(I'm trying not to laugh as I write this) he will investigate the price gouging. Well here is whats going to happen. I doubt there will be an investigation and if there is, it will be a half assed almost non-existent attempt. I mean come on two oil shills investigating big oil. Yeah Right! Thats like O.J annoucing he will look for the killers. These people have no credibility on investigating or truth seeking(name one investigation they voluntarily cooperated with). We saw how the investigations in the past went(Plame,leaks, 911). These guys(President,Vice president)refused to swear in before testilying, I mean testifying before the 911 commission. Well I guess it was no surprise the latest Bush apologist whore, Oops! I mean press secretary is none other than Tony Snow Fox news henchman. Now remember when a Clinton staffer got a job At ABC news. The neo cons were fraught with indignations such as thats the liberal media for you. The Clinton administration is in bed with the media. Hmmmm. Why can't Fox news just admit that they are just an extension of the Bushies. I mean come on. Oh and just in case I forget, Darcy and I feel that Sean Hannity who is a Bush whore of the highest order got taken for a ride and he rightly deserved the job as liar I mean press secretary. Sorry Sean you kissed so much ass for Bush and spewed his policies and you did not get a dime for it. Unlike the other prostitutes like Armstrong Williams etc. Well Sean as you know the difference between a hooker and a whore is just the fee charged. Darcy and I feel your pain. You know when Bush gets an erection Sean Hannity grows taller.

What's a Sophist?

Okay folks I have been asked in emails what in the hell a "sophist" is. I mean if this is not proof positive that our institutions of higher learning has failed us,I do not know what is.....well either that or I am being the arrogant,elitist,egotistical,prick I have always been accused of being. Well lets say its the former.........okay the latter. The sophists were fifth century teachers in ancient Greece. They taught culture and politics and rhetoric they also applied bogus reasoning and were concerned with winning arguments rather than establishing the truth(kind of like anyone on Fox News and Neo-Cons)Well anyway Plato had a few problems with them. He thought they were liars and "sophistry" became known to mean "fallacious reasoning". Now I must point out that in the beginning(pre-Socratic) to be a "sophist" was actually a good thing. It meant to be wise and to give wisdom. It was actually a very highly complimentary title. But in fairness to Plato the term in the second half of the fifth century especially in Athens the sophists went to the dark side. Okay thats enough on Greek history my head is hurting now.

Sick of double Standards!

I am so sick of hearing about this alleged rape at Duke University. It seems the race baiters on both sides are revving up this issue and of course the media is complicit in all of this. See folks this is why racism will always be pervasive in this country. Because we love to take racial sides. Just listen to talk radio, this woman has been called every name in the book because she is a stripper(interpretive dancer) and had two kids out if wedlock( I'm sure am glad she is the only one in the world who has ever done that)despite the fact she was in the Navy we will not bring that up. Now for the record I do not know what happened just like everyone else. I hope justice will prevail and I will leave it at that. But I can not help but notice how irrational people are when it comes to these issues. I feel the same way about these guys as I did about Michael Jackson,O.J and Kobe if they are proved to be innocent then let these men go about their lives and bring up charges on the woman, but if they are guilty then nail them! I find it funny that the same people who condemned Jackson,Kobe,O.J and was sure of their guilt are now saying. "Innocent until proven guilty"(concerning the men) Like as if all of a sudden lets be fair. But since we are divided along racial lines in this country anyone who takes sides uses this ploy.
So in the eyes of(I'm speaking generally here) white america you are innocent until proven guilty.....unless your name is Michael Jackson,Kobe,O.J.
And remember this........

The most hypocritical(Republicans)will always talk out of both sides of their mouths about the behavior of "those people" so they can pretend they're so "superior" to them. Meanwhile, on that same page, we had:

Republican County Councilman Keola Childs pleaded guilty to molesting a male child.
Republican activist John Butler was charged with criminal sexual assault on a teenage girl.
Republican candidate Richard Gardner admitted to molesting his two daughters.
Republican Councilman Jack W. Gardner was convicted of molesting a 13-year old girl.
The above would never be mentioned on Fox News.

Hey! You Neo-cons! Hell's a coming back!

BRACE YOURSELF!

The Evil Genius Returns May 1st 2006.

Immigration! (A Monologue)!

This is a subject that some people are so closeminded to on both sides of the issue.
So I approach this subject with caution. I do not want to be called a racist just because I may have an unpopular opinion. Well here it goes, a great number of illegal....lets say it together "illegal" aliens march across our borders everyday and lets be honest there are a great number of them who want to work and take care of their families and are hard workers and have good intentions when they cross our borders. But then there are some who do not necessarily follow the rules of this country as anyone living in California would know about the crimes from illegals. So what do we do? Well when I discovered that illegals account for about 10 billion dollars yearly,I knew that the do nothing government would do something to appease them,(we are capitalistic whores) so this is why they are creating an amnesty program that they refuse to call an amnesty program so they will call it the "guest worker" program which implies,hey these are our guest coming over for a visit and hey since they are here lets put them to work. Okay here is my concern,crime from illegals are low and the government does not care about it(see 10 billion dollars section)are we so concerned about this money that we are compromising national security. I mean we only discovered Yemeni's and Iraqi's crossing over the other day. So how long will it be before Al-Qaida figures that one out? Now I disagree with Fox's lawsuit it's a scare tactic! There has got to be a way to placate both sides I mean I can not blame them for wanting a better life for their families. But also Americas racist sides are coming out, I hear people talk about how hispanics are going to outnumber the white people someday in the United States. So! Why is that a bad thing? Because racists for years have made it seem bad to be a minority, Now the shoe is on the other foot and they do not like it. Hey to my latinos brothers and sisters I say "more power to you". but back to what Big Daddy was saying, We know they are hard workers, no argument there, but where in this fading republic's constitution does it read, hard work trumps national security? I say this because the northern border to Canada is just as porous and open and we have caught terrorists coming across that border all the time(but you never hear alot about it). My point is only about security because my problem is with both borders but sad to say you will only hear about just one and let me give you a hint(its not the one that borders a majority white country). I mean what happens when a terrorist walks across the border with a tactical suitcase nuke.Political correctness and racism is going to kill us all. I mean we had no problem turning the Haitians away who came here illegally,hell and even some Cubans except if they can throw a ball. But we find room for thousands of Serbians(Fort Dix) and now a "guest worker" program. In New Orleans there was not one illegal alien but now New Orleans is over run with illegals who were given jobs to rebuild when the locals residents were forced out of the bid(Thanks Mr. Bush and rescinding the Davis-Bacon Act))to help make money rebuilding their community and later those same people were called lazy because they could not find a job. Now those jobs have been "insourced" I hope there is a better solution where everyone can benefit. Remember before the creation of the KKK, blacks were brought from the south to break unions and as whites said in those days "to drive down wages" and a lot of whites lost their jobs and that prompted some men in Pulaski Tennesee to form the KKK. You know if these men just realized that they were being screwed by the corporations and not blacks it would have been better for them to band together white and black. Now I hope history is not repeating itself.But now I am not so sure because Mexico's attitude towards Central Americans is piss poor, and they are sending them back to their own country by the busloads when central americans cross Mexico's southern border but when Mexicans wants to cross our borders we are expected to understand and let them through. But again the mexicans do not want the central americans in their country.Hmmmm isn't racism interesting.

It was bound to happen.

Yeah I heard another Nascar guy bit the bullet the other day. I actually heard someone say..well it was not his time..Hmm lets see going 500 miles per hour on a oil slick track in a circle weaving in and out of cars at a dangerous speed.....yeah it wasn't his time my ass. That was bound to happen sooner or later thats the chance you take and he lost . Some one said lets make Nascar safer.....screw that if it was any safer we'd be watching traffic. Later!

Be afraid! Be very afraid!

I am so tired of these hypocritical neo cons totally rewriting history and using the magic of revisionism to cover up their transgressions.
The media is BUILT on the ashes of Clinton's impeachment, and there are so many whores on the news that if anyone even brings up a CENSURE, they get marginalized and called crazy. For impeachment, there is a simple formula here it goes:

1) Elect a Democratic majority in November
2) Hold their feet to the fire until they start investigating the bad intelligence and lies that drove us to war
3) Figure out EXACTLY what laws he broke THEN begin an impeachment, otherwise the Democrats will get their asses handed to them in the press because they'll be accused of a "revenge" impeachment...

Anthony's rule #1: If a Republican accuses you of something, it means they are doing it. See ya on the flip side.

I"ve heard that before.

I missed the show the other day I have just been busy. Well I guess we all seen that Andy Card just jumped ship. I wonder whats really going on? Hey here is a quote that reminds me of those damn Neo-Cons.

"Of course the people don't want war. But it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy,and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger."
-- Herman Goering at the Nuremberg trials

Damn, he sounds just like Bush.

Holla back what?

Okay I am so annoyed at this new website called hollabacknyc.com. Now me of all people loves to appreciate a beautiful woman(hell I'm human) I am not ashamed of that! But this website is geared towards women who are so put off (puhleeze) that men will say something rude or catcall to them.. Like oh hi sexy or some crude remark. I mean come on ladies. News flash to the ladies who made this site up. I know that men can be rude sometimes,maybe the site has a point. But if men did not bother to cat call, you will start to get angry that men are not paying attention to you. You will cry and go on Oprah.I know women who would actually do that.
So ladies please stop pretending that this just so offends you that you can't function. Just get with the program and tell these men to shut up and go to hell. Oh yeah please be thankful that someone still finds you attractive to say anything at all. Lets just be honest about this if these guys looked like Denzel,Brad,Boris, or Blair Underwood we would have never heard of this site.This is some subjective crap!

Talking Points Republicans!

You might be a republican if........

You think CNN is biased to the left, but Fox News is "fair and balanced."

Ever think of this?

Hey folks back from New York check this out! Not only does Bush embarass us by refering to the Indians and Pakistani's as Arabs.Bush made a previously unannounced visit to Kabul Wednesday to rally U.S. troops in Afghanistan and praise oil puppet OOPS! I mean our friend Hamid Karzai at a time of rising violence from the Taliban and al Qaeda terrorists. After a brief, four-hour visit Bush was expected to land in New Delhi Wednesday night for two days of high-level talks about India's nuclear program and why their economy is better than ours. Something that's true, but they never point out?
When Bush or Quick draw Cheney or Rummy or Condi go to Iraq or Afghanistan,
they have to make it a surprise because after all these years of US military might,
neither country is stable enough to announce a state visit in advance.
The only chance they have to visit either country is to zip in and out,
making sure there's no news of their visit until they're long gone.
And after four long and bloody years, we can't even control Baghdad's Airport Road.
Gee, do they think we might control Baghdad's Airport Road by, ...say, ...2010?

Meanwhile, Bush and the networks tell us, "We're winning the war!" Yeah Right!

Read between the lines.

I have been thinking so hear me out. I starting to think that this port issue could be a political ploy for republicans to win seats over democrats next election. That way they can say that they are independent of the president I mean even George Bush is not that stupid to.......Okay maybe he is, but just maybe this is a Karl Rove operation. Bush wants to take on Congress and have Congress win this by overriding his veto. Why? Because Bush, Rove, Cheney are deathly afraid that one House of Congress will flip to the Democrats
in the 2006 election. If that happens, hearing are going to be held on a ton of issues with the possibility of Bush being impeached on the illegal wiretap issue. The way to stop this is to have the Republican Congress "show" to the American people that they are independent of the White House.
Seriously -- this is a classic Republican political play. People like Rick Santorum will run ads saying: "Santorum stood up to the President when he was wrong on the port issue. We need independent leaders like Rick Santorum." We are in the middle of a failed Presidency. Bush has given up on the American people and is just trying to preserve some kind of legacy that is not tainted with illegal activities being uncovered. If illegal activities were to be uncovered, then Jeb Bush would never
have a chance to become President down the road. Just a thought from the Evil One!

Quick Draw Cheney!

Hey guys check this out. Believe me if this was someone in the Clinton administration you will never hear the end of it. A Vice President only job is to preside over the Senate and replace the president if anything should happen. This guy waits 14 1/2 hours to talk to the cops and he can also declassify information. Four days after shooting a friend and then trying to prevent us from finding out, Dick Cheney poured
his heart out by answering edited, softball questions from Brit Hume, his first wife of FOX Whore News. Sobbing like a recovering crack whore on Oprah, Cheney said, "That was my finger on the gun. I pulled the trigger and even the great Karl Rove can't figure a way to blame this mess on Bill Clinton."
Cheney got off-script and admitted drinking beer prior to demonstrating "depraved indifference" to human life. Cheny's second in command George Bush said he believes ole Dick.
Armstrong, Cheney's new spokeswoman, told CNN that she never saw Cheney or Whittington "drink at all until after the accident occurred, when the vice president fixed himself a cocktail back at the house." This is an old lawyer's trick.
When you committ a crime drunk, hide from police and drink even more, thus preventing the cops from knowing how drunk you were when you pulled the trigger and almost (and may still) kill somebody. Follow the liquor,God Bless America

Thinkers of the worlds UNITE!

Hey guys if you want to see how the right wing is delving more into stupidity. Check this out! Believe me, they think that they are going to be in your face with this crap. We will show them different. Remember that have "Evolution" all wrong thats why this is easy. Plus none of them were there when God so called created this world and the Bible itself is not all accurate in any sense. Just ask them then who created God? If all things had to have a creator then God had a creator and they will lie and say well God was just here he was not created. You say BULL! Then your creationist story falls apart. Its like shooting fish in a barrel.

Excerpt:
Boys and girls," Ham said. If a teacher so much as mentions evolution, scream at him, "Excuse me, were you there?' Can you remember that?"

The children roared their assent.

"So who should you always trust, God or the scientists?"

The children answered with a thundering: "God!"


Yes, lie to the children teach them that science is lying to them.
Japan and India and the others will pass America in a flash while Bush-ordered religious insanity is force-fed to every young and confused mind trying to make sense of the world around him or her.

Abandon the centuries of enlightenment and fall back to the world of dark shadows.
Tell them Santa, Satan and the Easter Bunny are real.
Tell them water boils when it wants to, and water freezes whenever you say a prayer.
Tell them to dismiss medical science, and to pick up rattlesnakes if they want to be cured. We're raising an entire generation of illogical, anti-science losers who can't compete on the world stage. Heres a link to this insanity

http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-na-creation11feb11,0,1110748.
story?coll=la-home-headlines

Hypocrites Abound

Recently I was accused of spinning one of my entries. Despite the fact that I provided a link so anyone can view it. Now I am pretty busy so sometimes I miss things as I did in my last posting. This does not happen often. I was accused by BigDog of spinning my facts and intentionally leaving out some dialogue with Gonzales. Big Dog found some more info concerning that and I posted it on the site(it's still there). Big Dog still wants to say that I spin facts now keep in mind he was giving me props for being fair about Alito. Also keep in mind he supports a administration that when called in to court they will never swear in, conducts wiretaps that everyone knows is illegal except anyone in their administration. thats okay Bigdog I do not want an apology from you and you would not give one anyway(thats not your style) Plus it would not mean anything to me anyway. By the way to anyone who misreads this post the hypocrisy is in the selective skepticism. And as far as what Professor W says. I tell you what if they believe in "rule of law" then release all documents that the prosecutors ask for and stop blocking investigations and do not be afraid to swear in when asked.

Be careful what you wish for!

I hope Big Dog does not return with this crap. Heres is a tape of torture boy explaining which administrations authorized electronic surveillance. Now I do not agree with everything on this site. But this is funny!

Remember the key word is "electronic" please try not to laugh.


http://www.infowars.com/video/clips/news/big_brother/020706_
gonzales_electro_surv.htm

Time to reign in the dog!

Big Dog who just the other day was giving me major props for being fair about Alito's record has accused me of spinning my entry concerning Feingold and Gonzales he claims that I left out intentionally the part of the text(which I sometimes leave things off my blog but I always provide a link to it so people can read it for themselves). Now here is the offending piece of info he just had to show me as if I had not seen it. the following is a response from Alberto Gonzales answering the question what administrations sought wiretaps outside FISA and did not get warrants

GONZALES: None come to mind, Senator, but I'd be happy to look to see whether or not that's the case.

FEINGOLD: I'll take it as a "no" unless you submit something.
(see BD's posting for the rest)
Now we know how the rest ends. You see Big Dog seems to focus on his percieved skullduggery only on one side . What questions has he thrown at this administration that have been critical. I was not trying to spin or trick any one I gave out the freaking link. But I do have a question. This administration loves to say others did it too. Okay.....which ones give me the names of past adminstrations who sought warrantless wiretaps outside of FISA. I want BigDog to find out which administrations
did it and I will post it on my blog. You see Gonzales could not answer Feingolds question because he knew none existed he was trying to buy time and Feingold knew it.
Remember this folks if this current administration knew they were following a precedent that another administration utilized why can't they cite who it was I mean this should be at the tips of their tongues right! The President does not have that kind of power period! Big dog find out who this mysterious administration is and report back to us now remember they have to have approached the same way Bush and co did(according to Bush) Happy hunting and by the way if you fail you owe me a apology. The clock is ticking.

Gotcha!!

Remember folks when I said that that evidence was faked when Colin visited the UN. I was criticized by everyone I was called a conspiracy nut and just plain wrong,. But check this out and believe me I am gloating it turns out Powells Chief of staff has a concience.
In a Feb 3 PBS interview, Colin Powell's former chief of staff claimed that the speech Powell made before
the United Nations on Feb. 5, 2003, laying out a case for war with Iraq, included falsehoods of which Powell
had never been made aware. He said, "My participation in that presentation at the UN constitutes the lowest
point in my professional life. I participated in a hoax on the American people, the international community and
the United Nations Security Council."

Colonel (ret.) Lawrence Wilkerson, still sees this lapse as the result of a profound intelligence failure, saying,
"I have to believe that. Otherwise I have to believe some rather nefarious things about some fairly highly placed
people in the intelligence community and perhaps elsewhere," hinting at Cheney and Rummy.
Link: http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Powells_former_chief_of_staff_on_0205
.html

I love it when I am right!

Business As Usual

Okay first of all I am so sick of these idiots who did not watch the funeral of Coretta Scott King and then try to critcize the speakers. I felt every remark made was appropiate. But what I find interesting about these neo-monkeys is that they keep saying that Bush did not get warrants because no other president had done it...What???
Now it is no shock that the above statement came from Sean Hannity. But if you guys watched the State Of The Union show you heard Bush say....

"Previous Presidents have used the same constitutional authority I have,
and federal courts have approved the use of that authority."

Hmmm interesting,but the Evil Genius is not finished here, check out the exchange
between Russ Feingold and Alberto(Torture Boy)Gonzales.(This is what I was talking about on the show when I mentioned Albertos accent)

Feingold:Do you know of any other President who has authorized
warrantless wiretaps outside of FISA?

Alberto Gonzales: Um, none come to mind, Senator. I can't give you an answer.

What the F**K? Why did not Feingold follow-up with, So why did your president lie last Tuesday? That would have been a great "follow up" question. here check out the link: http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/06/previous-admin/

Well I guess that was a dumb question on my part.

Here comes the Judge!

Here is the info I was telling Mike about this morning about Alito. Check it out for your self and makeup your own mind.


http://news.findlaw.com/newsmakers/samuel.alito.html#cases

In a word Democracy!

Hey it seems the Bush administration only likes democracy when the people they want in office wins. I mean he actually said that the Palestinians elected a corrupt government. He speaks from experience.

Go to sleep and let the band play on!

This posting is from one of my "partners in crime" Dennis (Red) Menace.

Abortion, Scalito and the last of the red hot barking
monkeys. Ok! For those of you in the normal flow of things
there probably isn't much here. As part of the
Republican Revolution (funny word that one,
revolution). In one sense denoting change, and in the
other referring to travelling the circumfrence of a
circle only to come back to the point you started at)
that began in 1996, was enthroned by judical edict in
2000 and weighs heavily now on the minds of
America-hating lefty types like me as the ice melts,
Europe freezes and the coasts drown.
Don't worry, says one of my favorite songs, go
back to sleep. Another, by the same artist, muses simply, "Learn
to swim." Big changes are coming in this grand revolution,
and as a student of history and the epistemes (look it
up fer crissakes...do a google on Foucault) that guide
it I find this all quite fascinating. Though I was
unable to make the show last week because I am still
forced to rely on 100 year old technology (the
internal combustion engine, more on this in a sec) as
a means of transportation, I did get a chance to call
in (nice job Jon, et al.) and there were a few points
I raised that I'd like to go over again:

Some thoughts on Martin Luther King, Jr. and his holy
day
My friends on the right like to start these types
of discussions with a nice first hand anecdote to set
the theme. I normally try and avoid these as they are
the least valuable of anything passing as a fact, but
in the spirit of the new times that are dawning as I
write, well...here goes.

In the last couple years I've worked a lot of
construction, and one of these jobs happened to be
a-way down south in Dixie. Everyone knew that I was a
Yankee and a liberal and had a general disdain for the
"Georges" of the world. One day the owner of the
company was standing with us as we had our morning
meeting and someone asked him jokingly if we would get
Dr. King's holiday off from work.

"Hell if we're going to do that why not kill 6
more niggers and take a week off," he replied.

Inspiring, no?

I often find it funny when people on the right
talk about the left, or insult its leaders. Surely
Harry Reid or Nancy Pelosi or Teddy Kennedy don't
necessarily strike us as prominent historical figures,
nor would we place a Jesse Jackson even or an Al
Sharpton on the same level as a Martin or a Malcolm.
Those of the right could point to figures from the
last fifty years who had pushed the cause to the point
of their now successful revolution with pride, even if
the rest of us look at a Nixon or a Reagan or a Bush
as common criminals made mad by power.

See, the thing is the great heroes of the left
aren't here to lead us now into the new dawn because,
by and large, they all got their fucking brains blown
out by some fucking hillbilly. Funny how that works.

Now that Martin is safely dead we can honor him,
with this one day, where maybe, just maybe, white
could look to non-whites and admit and ask forgiveness
for the crimes of racism...for the lynchings and rapes
and the beatings and the dogs and standing in the
courthouse door talking about miscegenation and not
mixing the races.

Some do. There would be no reason to continue the
dialogue between the races if there weren't peope from
all sides that can see past the biases ground into all
of us from birth. Dr. King knew this as he expanded
the civil rights cause in the last years of his life
and prepare to launch his anti-poverty poor people's
movement. Malcolm, too saw the truth of this after he
came back from Mecca and founded his own organization,
expressing a willingness to work with whoever was for
the cause of social justice and equality.

Most don't. White's get defensive when you bring
up the past. Blacks get angry and vent their
frustration with a system that is 1) slow to change,
and 2) unwilling to admit when it was wrong.

So what does King George do on the holiday? Does
he go to the old south and try and reach out to the
people left behind and left out, the people left
stranded on their roof tops because he was too busy to
give a shit if anyone was helping them? Does he try
and prove that he is a "uniter and not a
divider-upper?"

No. He goes to the Lincoln memorial and gives
thanks to a white guy for freeing the slaves...go
figure.

Now I mostly feel sorry for white's (those
individuals that you may often here or see me refer to
as "dumb crackers") still so caught up in some fantasy
facism ideal like white pride to see that they have
more in common with poor blacks than they do with rich
whites. It seems such a simple and obvious fact of
life in America that its shocking to me when people
dont get it. As long as we fight each other we are too
busy to fight the system that oppresses us all.

Which leads me into issue 2, namely: the
expansion of the powers of the presidency and the
executive branch.

It is not legal, in that old fashioned sense,
namely the laws on the books, for King George to
autorize spying on american citizens. My good friends
and obviously much more intelligent friends on the
right have made it clear that the above statement os
complete balderdash. That either something we will
call "provisional law" allows for it, or according to
AG Gonzles, the president was given this authority by
congresses authorization of military force after 9/11.
They expressly didn't give him this power, but who
cares really, cus he's doing it anyway and its for our
safety right, and that's what they really care about,
Bush and Rummy and the gang...our safety.

And the band plays on: "Go back to sleep..."

There is more going on here than this though.
More going on with the fight to overturn Roe and the
push for us all to accept that Alito is really a level
head guy, though he spent 25 years producing writing
that suggested he was, in fact, another right
wing-nut.

The president speaks only to groups that agree
with him. Protestors are always kept on the periphery
in what we call now "free speech zones." Funny how
when you want to protest King George and his imperial
and bloody war and do something to bring the senseless
killing to an end you have to stand a mile away...but
if you are a woman going into planned parenthood to
get a pap smear to make sure you don't have cervical
cancer, well, then the free speech zone is the
sidewalk out front and you have to pass through a
bunch of red hot barking monkeys holding up big
pictures of aborted fetuses.

Facism has a vile way of creeping in. What's the
line from the German guy? I paraphrase, "First they
came for the gypsies and I did nothing, Then they came
for the jews and I did nothing. And then they came for
me...and no one did anything."

We on the left don't fit and don't belong here
anymore. Just ask them, my many good friends on the
right. This is their country. Jesus is their savior.
Jehovah in all his wisdom is their god. And, by golly,
the bible and the constitution means what they say it
does. End of discussion...

They might profess an interest in new ideas,
thinking outside the box, challenging the status quo,
but they don't really mean it and very slowly they are
and will continue to criminalize dissident voices. If
we are to fight the enemy then we must be united, yes?
Don't worry, its for your own good, freedom is slavery
and knowledge is ignorance and the Right way is
obviously the right way...it even says so in the name.

They used to burn left-handed folks at the stake,
ya know. And so it goes...

Food for thought!

I will be In Dallas Tx on mon on business and Kc and the WSX gang will carry the torch in my absence. I was going to post here but I think you guys need to read this article. Its all one line but I had to break it up for the blog.It's sad but I think it paints an interesting picture.

http://groups.google.com/group/
Coalitionforfreethoughtinmedia/msg/339447f2ecaef4db

"Talk show hosts like Hannity, O'Reilly and Limbaugh act like they know all about war then they refuse to give any credence to soldiers like me who have been to war and seen the brutality of war. These guys are nothing but WEAK SPINELESS COWARDS hiding
behind microphones while soldiers come home and are losing everything they have."
--Spc. Doug Barber, who took his own life Tuesday, after struggling with PTSD for two years.

Say goodbye to the dummy!

Since insecure neo-con idiots can not respect difference of opinion and also I do not want this site abused any more. Effective immediately no comment written will be posted immediately to the site. They will be posted but only after they are filtered. Which means you can still post your agreements or disagreements concerning me,its just that you will never hear from starchild or any other neo con idiot ever again due to their abusive and name calling they will be automatically filtered out. I have a list of people who I will allow to post immediately to this blog and I will be contacting you about it. So have fun and know that you never have to worry about those idiots again.

The idiot strikes again!

Lets all have a laugh at the child who keeps posting. Go ahead post something else stupid silly child.This guy is so insecure.
I am sure you have read the comments from the so called little dumb child or the "child". You see folks this wannabe host can not talk principle so what he is reduced to is gay name calling. It made his small day for me to respond to him. The more he insults the less he knows. I will always remove entries from this person because all Mr.M does is insult. What an idiot this person really is. You see folks, this person will not call the show because they do not want to face real opposition so this is their only outlet. Maybe this person has gay issues I do not know or nor do I care.
But just remember this that everytime he posts something stupid just remember it is a testament to our side and how we are correct and they are lost so lets laugh at this human debris and wait for his next stupid posting.I would love to actually have an open dialogue between myself and the "child" but I do not think they he has the capacity to be on my level. But I will await a negative posting in regards to this. You can do it "child". Keep posting here on this blog because I am way out of your league. Don't hate "lil child" Appreciate!

Fake Outrage!

Oh wow let's see..... Hilary makes an accurate comment about the adminstration and the republicans are pretending that they are upset about it and that they never engage in race baiting. I will not waste too much time with this because this is so stupid. You see if you watch fox news or listen to right wing talk radio you will never know that Newt Gingrinch said the exact same thing about twelve years ago to describe democrats and guess what?........The republicans forgot to be upset with Newt. Also out of all the things Hilary said. They keep coming back to this plantation comment. Hilary said it on purpose and got the desired response. Here is the exact statement so you can see what she actually said.

"has been run like a plantation, and you know what I'm talking about,It has been run in a way so that nobody with a contrary view has had a chance to present legislation, to make an argument, to be heard."

"We have a culture of corruption, we have cronyism, we have incompetence," she said. "I predict to you that this administration will go down in history as one of the worst that has ever governed our country." Out of all this they just heard plantation.
She told the truth.....any questions

Hey "Dumb Child"! Tick Tock Tick Tock!

Lets all have a laugh at the child who keeps posting. Go ahead post something else stupid silly child.This guy has been so hell bent on insulting me that he just made one crucial mistake. Tick Tock "dumbchild".
I am sure you have read the comments from the so called little dumb child or the "child". You see folks this wannabe host can not talk principle so what he is reduced to is gay name calling. It made his small day for me to respond to him. The more he insults the less he knows. I will always remove entries from this person because all Mr.M does is insult. What an idiot this person really is. You see folks, this person will not call the show because they do not want to face real opposition so this is their only outlet. Maybe this person has gay issues I do not know or nor do I care.
But just remember this that everytime he posts something stupid just remember it is a testament to our side and how we are correct and they are lost so lets laugh at this human debris and wait for his next stupid posting.I would love to actually have an open dialogue between myself and the "child" but I do not think they he has the capacity to be on my level. But I will await a negative posting in regards to this. You can do it "child". Keep posting here on this blog because I am way out of your league. Don't hate "lil child" Appreciate!

A TRUE PATRIOT!

So we're seeking some common ground yes? Two wings
make the eagle fly, what what?

First, I'd ask you to site some specific refrences of
the "untrue things" you've heard or seen me write or
say about Bush. It is certainly not my intention to
spread more falsehoods. It is my intent to spread some
light to some of the dark corners that the
establishment wishes us not to see.

Here we will likely come to the first obstacle between
us: bias in the media. Those of the right-wing would
have us believe that the media as an interest is
liberal, or left-leaning. Those on the left see
corporate interests that could not help but be biasd
towards their owners, namely, the people on the right
who believe that the media is liberal...ad naseum, ad
infinitum.

I may be wrong, but i believe in logic this is termed
a solipism. A circular argument...

Still, we have to discern and refine our thoughts and
opinions based on the information that comes to us via
the media. As a media consumer I try to draw from as
wide a range of material and mediums so as to have a
reasonable handle on what everyone is saying.

As a media producer, first through the Free Press,
then through the show and my latest career venture, I
admit a bias. I like underdogs, I like the meek, the
poor, the weak of heart. I like to champion their
causes because no one else, or few else, will.

Here we reach the second obstacle: interpretation.

What's it all mean? Wars and elections and taxes and
the whole big world...what does it all mean? I would
assume, I think reasonably, that you are a Christian.
You have sent me religious material, and I have the
sense that you are, moreover, an apocalyptic
Christian, waiting for the rebuilding of the temple
and the gathering of the armies at Megiddio.

I must admit that I don't fully grasp the brand of
Christianity that seems all the craze these days.
There is a hateful attitude that drives a group of
people to pickett someone's funeral. Do we have common
ground here, Chris?

I too look to the skies and await the return of the
son of man. I look to the day of judgement when we
will all have to account and atone for our actions. I
look to the day when blessed will be the peacemakers,
and the meek inherit the earth. What a grand thing...

We all have our filters. From my good book and all
those sunday school lessons I learned tolerance,
humility, and forgiveness. Do we have common ground
here?

You speak of national identity, and I will tell you
first off that I am leery of nationalism as a means of
motivating a people. I am not threated by a
pluralistic society that can speak with many voices.
My concept of personal liberty is the freedom from
nationalistic or other "group think" philosophies.
Still, there is something to being a nation. We are
unique species among all the races of man, because we
are all races of man. And woman. Queer and straight
and black and white and indian and african and polish
and the whole sordid lot. We are all america, so in my
vision there is no national identity without near
absolute personal liberty.

I also believe, futhermore, that the basis of our
government and the spirit of our constitution should
always stem from a deep and profound respect for the
liberty and soverignty of the individual. Is there
common ground here?

Here we reach the next road block: the culture wars.

I am to assume that if not you, then most right-wing
Christians, republicans, neo-cons and the whole lot,
would be really threatened if my sister and her wife
could have a legally sanctioned union? I am further to
assume that the idea of a worker owning their own
labor is also to be ranked among the many liberal "bad
ideas." I am also to assume that the very idea that,
given the vast resources and talents at the disposal
of mankind, that the idea that everyone should be fed
and clothed, provided shelter and safe drinking water,
that everyone should be afforded the basic necesities
of life...this too would be another bugaboo sent to
threaten the hallowed halls of western civilization?


I too see a great nation crumbling. I see broken
infrastructure, corruption, and the consoldation of
power in the hands of fewer and fewer people. I see
the people's fears used as a means to keep them
divided and servile. I see the slow, steady
degredation of our enviroment as the insatiable
american appetite continues to devour more and more
resources.

We may argue about forms of economic exchange,
supply-side trickle down or estate taxes or why it is
a threat to the economy to suggest that people on
minimum wage should get a dollar raise, but how it
never seems a threat to the economy when a ceo tacks
on another milion dollar bonus.

We could argue these finer points all we want, but in
the end the system we have in place now and that looms
large over the world, global corporate commodification
of every aspect of life, well, that system is simply
not sustainable.

Maybe the money or the oil or the potable water runs
out in 2040, or 2090, or maybe we even make it another
century as a nation...what then? What does the future
hold Chris? Were all the wars and votes and lives cast
before history so we could end up handing over to our
great grandchildren one world under Halliburton? Is
there no limiting the market? Ever? What do they call
this...worshipping mannon?

As to leadership. Striking new ground may be bold, and
bold action may be what the situation warrants.
Sometimes though, especially if you have no recon of
the wilderness, if you have no idea where to cross the
streams, or no concept of where the ice is
weak...well, sometimes caution and wisdom should weigh
out over bold action, lest the whole enterprise be
lost...my idea is that a real leader knows the
difference between the two. Do we have common ground
here?

Lincoln made the point: a house divided can not stand.

I respect you, and everyone that aligns themselves
with the right wing of this great eagle. I hope that
in the end we can accept one another and face the
challenges as one nation, indivisble...but I will not
willingly see this nation congealed under a banner of
demographic marketing, christian fundamentalism and
the morals of the Spartan war state.

See any common ground?

dennis-the red menace

The Coward Returns!(aka Baby Huey)

Lets all have a laugh at the child who keeps posting. Go ahead post something else stupid silly child.
I am sure you have read the comments from the so called little star child or the "child". You see folks this wannabe host can not talk principle so what he is reduced to is gay name calling. It made his small day for me to respond to him. The more he insults the less he knows. I will always remove entries from this person because all Mr.M does is insult. What an idiot this person really is. You see folks, this person will not call the show because they do not want to face real opposition so this is their only outlet. Maybe this person has gay issues I do not know or nor do I care.
But just remember this that everytime he posts something stupid just remember it is a testament to our side and how we are correct and they are lost so lets laugh at this human debris and wait for his next stupid posting.I would love to actually have an open dialogue between myself and the "child" but I do not think they he has the capacity to be on my level. But I will await a negative posting in regards to this. You can do it "child". Keep posting here on this blog because I am way out of your league. Don't hate "lil child" Appreciate!

Fair is Fair Letterman!

I was disgusted at the exchange between David Letterman and Bill O"Reilly the other day. Now I am no big fan of O'Reilly but in all fairness he was ambushed by Letterman and Paul Schaeffer they were trying to ridicule him. I mean the interview started off nice Letterman was giving him a honest talk of how that was crap of that Christmas attack business Fox and Bill have been pushing. Cool I was with Letterman on that part. But we parted ways when he got off that subject and into waters he had no business swimming. This is why the left gets teased and accused of going off half cocked. Letterman while insulting O'Reilly admitted he never watched the show so Bill rightfully said then how can you comment on my show. Now I do not feel totally sorry for Bill because I do watch his show and he does the same thing plus he lies but I do not like to see people get ambushed whether its liberals or conservatives(notice I did not say neo-con there is a difference I hate them)sadly Letterman stooped to O'Reilly and Hannity's level you have to call them on their crap whether you like them or not! You see people are always criticizing myself and the show but can not bring a single instance of substance only name calling which Letterman engaged in.
What Bill should have done is slapped Letterman and kicked Paul in his nuts and walked out.(damn lightweights) Just Kidding! Letterman quit doing your imitation of Rosie O'Donnell and get a clue. Now some of you may have some kind of cognitive dissonance that I critiqued Bill O'Reilly but yet took his side... Well if you can not understand independent opinion then you are beyond help.

Bonfire of the Inanities!

With all the things going on in this country. I mean with the whitehouse being overun with felons and scandals in the whitehouse and congressional scandals I am glad that Bill O'Reilly decided to really talk about what really on the minds of americans...holiday salutations. What a Jerk. But now we come face to face with another neo-con scandal with Abramoff. Reminds me of ole Cunningham in california.
But say this much for Cunningham. He set a good example for his fellow Republicans by resigning in disgrace. If by next year at this time we’ve seen several more Republicans blubbering like defrocked beauty queens after copping pleas, 2006 will seem blessedly shorter than 2005.

Remember this: (thinking americans only please)
George W. Bush picked a fight he was sure he could win — because the con artists who own and operate him told him he could. So in front of every other kid in the world, he called his victim out to the playground and had six or seven of his goons restrain the little guy while he hit him with everything he could find. In doing so, he pissed off everyone else on the playground. So when Bush turned away from his bloodied victim to raise his hands in triumph, he was hit squarely from behind with a two-by-four. Repeatedly. And it hasn’t stopped for two and a half years. Boy its sure good to see the devil get his due. Isn't God wonderful!

Crazy Quotes!

Here are some interesting quotes I discovered.

"As you can probably see I was injured myself, not here at the hospital but in combat with a cedar. I eventually won."
-- Dubya, joking about getting wounded clearing brush on his fake ranch with amputee soldiers,


"We must never tolerate one law for the Ruler, and another for the Ruled."

-- Henry Hyde, back when the president was a Democrat (damn hyocrite)
Henry, where are you?
Isn't it time to speak up?


"I don’t know of any legal basis to go around the FISA court. There may be some, but I’m not aware of it. And here’s the concern I have. We can’t become an outcome-based democracy. Even in a time of war, you have to follow the process, because democracy is about a process."
-- Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-Whore)
Lindsey, you impeached the last president who you thought broke the law.
What's stopping you this time?


"This needs to be investigated, because whoever leaked this information
has done the U.S. and its national security a great disservice."
-- Mitch McConnell (R-Whore) pretending Osama had no idea Bush could listen to phone calls.

"If leaking classified info is such a big deal, then when is Karl Rove being fired?
Seriously. When is Karl being fired?
Or is it only a crime to leak when it proves that Bush is committing a felony?"
-- John Aravosis.
I had fun with these quotes it seems the neo-cons have a different set of standards when its their guy.

Happy New Year !

Happy New Year! Lets hope this new year brings this great country's government some accountability. Cheers!

Impeachment! Why yes.

This is what Bush's impeachment hearing will be like. It will play like that scene from a few good men.


Bush: Wiretapping? Wiretapping?

Son, we live in a world that has liberals.

And those liberals have to be stopped by men with wiretaps.

Who's gonna do it? You?

You, swiftboat Kerry?

I have a greater responsibility to defend our oil interests than you can possibly fathom.

You weep for the Constitution and you curse the NSA. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing how much I don't know: that the Constitution's death, while tragic, probably gave record profits to the oil companies.

And my reelection, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves profits...

You don't want the truth. Because deep down, in places you don't talk about at you gay marriage receptions, you want me spying on you. You need me spying on you.

We use words like God, late-term abortions, intelligent design... we use these words as the backbone to a life spent dividing a nation.

You use 'em to further your whiny liberal causes.

I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to my subjects who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very "freedom" I provide, then questions the manner in which I provide it!

I'd rather you just said "hail Bush" and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you flush down a Koran and start torturing some terrorists. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you're entitled to!

Congress: Did you order the wiretappings?

Bush: I did the job the Supreme Court elected me to do.

Congress: Did you order the code red?

Bush: You're goddamn right I did!!

And by god I mean the voices in my head.

And 9/11.
Boy those neo-cons really hate "rule of law" when it applys to them.

What a coward!

I am sure you have read the comments from the so called star child or the "child".
You see folks these cowards can not talk principle so what they are reduced to is gay name calling. The more he insults the less he knows. I have tried to remove entries from this person but I decided to let them stay on to show people what an idiot this person really is. You see folks this person will not call the show because they do not want to face real opposition so this is their only outlet. Maybe this person has gay issues I do not know or nor do I care.
But just remember this that everytime he posts something stupid just remember it is a testament to our side and how we are correct and they are lost so lets laugh at this human debris and wait for his next stupid posting.I would love to actually have an open dialogue between me and the "child" but I do not think they he has the capacity to be on my level. But I will await a negative posting in regards to this. You can do it "child"

The Freakman Cometh!

Okay I must admit whenever I hear Bill O'reilly say something about morality I burst out with a big gut laugh. Okay first of all it started wuth this judge(republican Bush appointee mind you) who ruled in Dover Delaware that intelligent design does not need to be mentioned as an alternative view in a biology class. The judge was right ID is not science. I mean how many churches let atheist groups get up in church and say there is an alternative view to theism.Answer none. So what is their f**king problem.
Oh yeah I forgot they are pests thats their problem.And for you readers I am not talking about the average christian I am talking about the Pat Robertston type nutcases. Anyway O'reilly went out against this gay movie called Brokeback mountain(about gay cowboys). He kept saying on how this movie was terrible and immoral(never saw it) then he would punctuate each sentence with I do not care about the movie. Then why talk about it then? I mean is this the same guy who told his female producer that he is masturbating over the phone while he is talking to her and how he loves a dildo in his ass. I think this movie hits close to home lil Billy and go see this movie you may realize something about yourself and if you can't come don't call.

They put the Funk in Dysfunctional!

It seems that the nutcases are at it again. These Christmas freaks are out of their mind. No please I am not bashing christmas I happen to like christmas but in an effort to get more money from their flock. These holiday pimps are taking very fringe isolated small cases of christmas bashing and making it mainstream. So they are creating a christmas crisis when none really exists. If you want to know whats that tantamount too just imagine if I gathered all the incidents of all isolated cases of white oppression against minorites then said on my show these whites are mean and they are attacking minorities everyday. Now thats not representative of all whites and thats stupid and imprudent to assume that premise. But if you will around look you will find that christmas crisis revels on fox news and every neo-con show.You see neo-cons look for logic like a thief looks for a policeman. If you hear a rattoothed neo-con give you that christmas lie again. Tell to shut up and take his/her f**king medicine.

Almost had him.

The following is a dramatization based on events that happened last year when Iraqi security forces captured Zarqawi and let him go because they could not identify him and also despite of the fact there are pictures of him all over the place.
Setting: Baghdad,Iraq police station.
(Scene: Two Iraqi police officers are questioning a suspect. They do not know who he is but in reality he is blood thirsty terrorist insurgent Zarqawi.)

1st Officer: So who are you friend?

2nd Officer: Yeah who are you? You look like this Zarqawi guy(throws down on the desk a copy of a magazine with Zarqawi's face on the cover).

Suspect(Zarqawi): Well my name is um...umm......ummm Ned and I am from Compton yeah thats right.

1st Officer: (disbelief)Hmmm are you sure. Because if you are the bandit Zarqawi, we will take you to the secret cia prison camp and torture you.

2nd Officer: Yeah we are already kidnapping innocent Oops! I mean were are capturing enemy combatants and with out much evidence we are dunking their heads in water until they drown and then we electroshock them back to life and ask them questions.Also we hook electrodes to their genitals and then zap them and then ask them questions and identify what terrorist group they are from we have to identify every potential terrorist.

Suspect(Zarqawi): Gosh that sounds alot like torture to me.

1st Officer: Shut up fool! we are merely engaging in light aggressive interrogation techniques according to the wonderful Bush adminstration memos.

2nd Officer: But back to the what we were saying earlier you look a lot like Zarqawi I mean you look like all the photos of him.

Suspect(Zarqawi):(using the Jedi mind trick on them) No I am not him, I am from Nebraska. You will not need my identification you will let me go at once.

1st Officer:(Jedi trick working)Well although we can not identify you and that is important. Despite the fact of your uncanny resemblence you are obviously are not him because we can not identify you. So we will continue snatching and detainng people and asking them hard questions and maybe we can find Zarqawi one day.

Suspects gets up to leave room and has he walks out the door he is greeted by his 6ft 6 wife wheeling a very strange contraption behind her. Hmmm probably nothing! The officers goes back to watching the ending of a movie called the "Usual Suspects".

Wrong again! Doggy Dog Dog!

This is why Bush is in so much trouble. Look at the comment section of the previous posting. Much like the administration Big Dog cherry picked info concerning spying and accused me of being deceitful. This is what he said
"READ THIS ANTHONY!!!!!!!!
I suggest you look at the law itself and stop your assinine media sourced opinions. I mean for fucks sake man, this is the second instance you have indulged in such ill-informed misleading tactics."

Okay you know Doggy is right! I mean although I said in my last posting that neo-cons do not let facts get in the way of their opinions. Maybe we should look at what Big Dog posted (note) There is a reason why thinking people like the NSA officials Aclu,Congress and others feel that laws were broken. You see No President can make an executive order that can supercede the Constitution with the exception of Martial Law(maybe). When you review what Big Dog put up you will come to find out has I have that these provisions did not cover domestic spying, hell it does not even mention the word domestic in any of Big Dog postings. You see law makers and the NSA knew this thats why they were a little antsy. Now here is where the splitting of legal hairs come in, the provisions cover foreign intel only now if you are intercepting emails that originate in the states thats not foreign intel thats domestic intel which has certain laws governing that which the President did not follow(notice Big Dog did not post anything having to do with domestic spying because he was trying to trick you and I (much like the President) to use those foreign provisions to apply domestically. (maybe big dog is not used to doing his own research if he makes a big blunder like that) Sorry Big Dog, that Dog won't hunt! So I want you to see Big Dogs postings its under the Say it ain't so post. Big Dog I am shocked that you in your dislike of me put up such a silly posting that proves my point again! Here is a question for you Dog (to get you on the right side of the arguement)I dare you to answer.. Where in the constitution allows the President to do what he did? And why did he violate the domestic portion of the act and bypass the courts? I will ask you this on the air tommorow Doggy and until you redeem yourself and apologize for being wrong you will be known as little dog. Impeachment anyone?

Anthony say it ain't So! Its So.

It seems that people do not realize the severity of this latest Bush fiasco.
There is a protocol stated forth in the law that the President has to follow involving warrants from the courts secret or otherwise. This man blatantly did not follow any rules. He bypassed the courts why? What constitutional law allows this? There were even operatives from the NSA (whose job it is to spy)who felt uneasy and wondered about the legality of this operation and did not help the administration out and I know this because it was implied in the article of the Times when it read that "Some NSA officials were so concerned about the legality of the program that they refused to participate" Also the Times said. "Questions about the legality of the program led the administration to temporarily suspend it last year and impose new restrictions." Now all of you individuals who love to quote FISA please do not forget this part....
The law governing clandestine surveillance in the United States, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, prohibits conducting electronic surveillance not authorized by statute. A government agent can try to avoid prosecution if he can show he was "engaged in the course of his official duties and the electronic surveillance was authorized by and conducted pursuant to a search warrant or court order of a court of competent jurisdiction," according to the law. Now this part is important

"Engaged in the course of his official duties and the electronic surveillance was authorized by and conducted pursuant to a search warrant or court order of a court of competent jurisdiction," Does anyone out there knows what pursuant means? Big Dog?

That is the part Bush missed because there were no warrants or court orders issued.
The only thing he did that neo-cons will try to say was court related was that he notified the judge and talked to some congressional members thats it! Notifying the court is not a warrant or a court order, neither is talking to Congressional members. Get it! And remember that the activities of the NSA fall out of the jurisdiction of the Patriot Act.(read it if you do not believe me). As a former board member of the ACLU (The American Civil Liberties Union)eavesdropping in the US without a court order and without complying with the procedures of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act is "both illegal and unconstitutional". Hey do not take my word for it. Listen to what Elizabeth Rindskopf Parker,former NSA general counsel said, "it was troubling that such a change would have been made by executive order, even if it turns out to be within the law".

Hey I just found this out the NSA activities were justified by a classified Justice Department legal opinion authored by John C. Yoo, a former deputy in the Office of Legal Counsel who argued that congressional approval of the war on al Qaeda gave broad authority to the president,this was according to the Times. Now remember Yoo was the one that made a very similar legal argument in another 2002 memo which outlined an extremely narrow definition of torture. That opinion, which was signed by another Justice official, was formally disavowed after it was disclosed by the Washington Post. Hey Neo-Con's please do not let these facts get in the way of your opinions.

Just A Thought!

Your right Dennis(The Red)Menace about the communism remark. I'll fix that.
But I want to add to what you commented on. The neo-cons are bitch blind and can only see the bad that democrats and liberals and libertarians. So I doubt if any one will be honest about this. Remember "Compassionate Conservatism" is really "Friendly Fascism"!

Zarqawi who? Never heard of him!

Now here is something that makes me wonder. Iraqi security forces(What does that mean?) caught Zarqawi last year but released him. What the F**K?
And here is the punchline, because they didn't realize who he was according to the deputy minister Kamal. he told reporters. He said that Iraqi police "suspected this man" and detained him "along with other members" of his group. "Afterwards, he was released because we did not know the identity of this criminal," Kamal said.

"He was not armed," Kamal said. "He was like any other citizen who was suspected.
There was a simple interrogation with him and he was released."

Okay here is my evil point. If they can't tell when they've hit the jackpot, why are they detaining anybody?
If they let Zarqawi go - then who in the F**K are they detaining? Is it just me folks.

Funny Quotes!

Hey this is something Bush said and I thought it was funny enough to share it now if your a neo_con you will miss the humor and call me an american hater.


"Yes, I do."
- ( Bush, when he was asked by Britney Hume if he believes Tom DeLay is innocent.

Now here is my point that's strange because when they asked Bush "Is Karl Rove innocent?" he said "I can't comment on that." What a difference a lie makes.

1984 has already been here!

Okay I know you heard the reports about Bush authorized the NSA(here is an organization that really uses the Patriot Act) to spy on Americans.

The National Security Agency has eavesdropped, without warrants, on as many 500 people inside the United States at any given time since 2002, The New York(Bush) Times reported.

That year, following 9-11, Bush authorized the NSA to monitor the international phone calls
and international e-mails of hundreds — perhaps thousands — of people inside the United States.

Before the program began, the NSA typically limited its domestic surveillance to foreign embassies and missions and obtained court orders for such investigations.

The revelation that the Bush administration is using the NSA to spy on Americans without a court order is disturbing for many reasons. Besides the obvious move towards a crypto-fascist society the fact that the New York Times sat on this story for more than a year because the White House told them to(can you believe that shit,liberal media my ass) this act shows that not only are we secretly being spied on, but also that Bush has control over the press. This is an administration that pays journalist to push their agenda and misleads us into a war then changes the reason for it when it goes bad. Then fixes Saddams trial as not to implicate two Republican administrations
Am I the only one disturbed by this. Lets see Bush is good and Clinton had a intern pay attention to his nutsack and he is a dispicable and lying and untrustworthy person. Hmmm sounds about right!

Gotta Love Saddam!

Boy that Saddam is sure giving that "kangaroo court" a run for its money.
I mean not showing up for court, telling people to go to hell. I find this very entertaining. Just some questions I have surrounding this trial.

Why is he not being charged with anything having to do with 911?

Why is he being charged with crimes prior to 1982 and not the 1983 and 1988 crimes in which he killed Iranians and Kurds and put them in mass graves. Which is one of the reasons we invaded(remember mass graves being filled remember that bullshit)
I am sure it had nothing to do with the fact that we sold him those weapons and helped him cover up those kurds deaths. So Saddam recognizes that he is being setup so he is acting a fool and I love it.

Fake Outrage!!

I am loving this fake outrage act about "happy holidays" and "merry christmas" being eradicated form our speech. I mean there are so many genuine things to be mad about than this stupid stupid area of human interest. If you for even one second are outraged about this, then you need a life and you are really pathetic. I mean out of all that is going on in our country ie, mismanaged war, lies concerning this war, spy in the whitehouse. We as Americans pick this to be outraged about. Well F**k those who are outraged and F**k christmas too. Merry Christmas!

To Torture or not to Torture?

I can not believe that these neo-cons have trouble recognizing torture.
I mean rational human beings like ourselves know torture when we see it right? I mean I am not against torturing the terrorist when we find them, but lets be honest about what we do. Below is a lie er..... I mean quote from Cheney loyalist Porter Goss. Now decide for yourself if its torture.....

“What we do, does not come close to torture...”
-- CIA Director Porter Goss

Hmmm does not come close to torture......?
It's amazing that Goss would say that, after the White House admitted they've gotten
"valuable secrets" from their practice of "water boarding." Do you know what that is?

It's when you tie a man to a see-saw device, where the shifting of weight is enough to
lower his head under water. After he gets a few lungfulls of water, and sometimes dies,
they pull him out, electric-shock him back to life(stay with me) so they can torture him Oops! I mean ask him some more questions(I guess that electro shock thing is just to get his attention, Damn ADHD).
They kill him again and again - over and over - and if they go too far and he can't be
revived, they call it "a mysterious death" and have a Pentagon doctor rule that the
suspect died of "natural causes."

Does that sound like torture to you? Can we make that call????

A secret memo issued by Administration lawyers authorized the C.I.A. to use novel interrogation
methods—including “water-boarding,” in which a suspect is bound and immersed in water until he
nearly drowns. Dr. Allen Keller, the director of the N.Y.U. Program for Survivors of Torture, said that he had treated a number of people who had been subjected to such forms of near-asphyxiation,
and he argued that it was indeed torture. Some victims were still traumatized years later, he said.
One patient panicked when it rained. (When it freaking rained)