"People Believe In Free Speech, Until They Hear Free Speech They Do Not Like".
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
About Damn Time Thanks Marc!
This a reprint letter from Marc Perkel talking about the Tea Party. I have a question. Where was the tea party during the Bush administration? Also double click on the pic so you can see how racist the teabaggers are not
The National Tea Party Federation expelled the Tea Party Express this week over how to handle racist views. Tea Party Express leader Mark Williams decided that it was time for them to be honest about their racism and to come out of the closet and say what they really mean. And Mark did so by writing a satirical letter to President Abraham Lincoln about what "colored people" want.
No No No says the National Tea Party Federation. You don't call them "colored people". That's highly offensive.You have to respect them by calling them "people of color". This is an election year and the National Tea Party Federation, made up of former Republican leaders like Newt Gingrich and Dick Army, understand that overt racism doesn't win elections. Their position is to hide the racism, stay in the closet, and be politically correct. Don't say what you really think. So the National Tea Party Federation expelled the Tea Party Express because they refused to lie about how they really feel.
The Republican Party completely understands that there is a difference between what you do and what you say. The Republicans get it! They have a person of color, Michael Steele, as the Republican National Committee Chairman. And even though Mr. Steele had a little problem with RNC money paying to take a group of Christian conservatives to a lesbian bondage themed sex club, Mr. Steele keeps his job; possibly sending a message to the political left that there might be a place for affirmative action in the Republican Party.
So who is right? Do voters respect honesty?
Or is it that smart politicians understand that you have to tell the voters what they want to hear? I say, they both are right. Honesty and sincerity is what wins elections. That's what the public wants. So once you learn how to fake sincerity and honesty, you have it made!
ADDITIONALLY : I try to keep my letters short. However, I am on a roll so if you have room for a longer piece, below is what you would add for the long version:
Now there are two Tea Parties. One for those who are openly racist and one for those who are not comfortable being openly racist. Who says the Tea Party isn’t a big tent? And they are all going to vote Republican this fall because even though they have a black chairman, they have a long history of racist voting records and legislation.
Although America has come a long way in electing our first mixed race president, we are not there yet. Racism is not over and Obama in the first. I remember as a child hearing discussions about if Kennedy could be an effective president because he is Catholic.Obamaa is the first, and when you are first, your culture is on trial. The issue of whether Blacks are ready to lead America, especially during these troubled times.
Think about it. What are the Republicans running on? Do you think they are running on their record of accomplishment? Even they don’t say that! So it’s a good thing in my opinion to get the whole racial thing out in the open and talk about it. Because in order for racism to really go away, we have to merge our cultures and both sides will have to give up segregationist thinking. And it’s going to take some time before we get there.
But I personally an not allow racial issues to distract me in choosing my leaders. What matters to me in this election is that we are in tough times and I want to choose the candidate who is wisest and who is most likely to make the right choices that get us from where we are to where we need to be. So my criteria is based on who has the best plan? Convince us that you can make it happen. I want someone with a deep respect for reality and who understands that if you don’t get right with reality, that there are consequences. You want my vote then inspire me with your vision of the future. Is your vision “Star Trek”? “The Matrix,” or “Planet of the Apes”? I want to hear “Star Trek”.
Marc Perkel
Monday, July 19, 2010
Dumber Is As Dumber Does!
"He is a race batter too and has no problems showing his ignorance about GOD. He claims he was a Christian once (once mind you) and a Muslim(cant stand pork) and a Buddhist(looks like one) oh and he also was harassed as being the waldo rapist because he fit the profile.(rape with what?) He is everything to himself but nothing to anyone. Very self centered and any post that makes him look a fool he doesn't post. Why do you think he reviews them before posting comments. You are lucky he posted your comment. Now think about this one. How is it you get fired from a volunteer radio station?...LMAO!!!"
BIGDOG - Bigdog lying on and insulting me because he feels insecure that he is a bad speller.
This is a quote from a guy who call himself bigdog. I will refrain from insulting him too much because unlike him I actually have substance and facts and do not need to engage in ad hominem attacks. Ok lets see where should we start, I did used to be a Christian and a Muslim...that's true. I never was and never have claimed to be a Buddhist,I am puzzled where he got that one from(probably pulled it from that over sized fat gelatinous ass of his) Oops I forgot no ad hominem attacks...I was never harassed as the Waldo rapist but I was questioned by police. plus I am no longer at KKFI but not due to what bigdog is trying to allude to. There is a whole site dedicated to what really happened and since bigdog can't read or spell he is not an accurate source of information on anything. He is a pathetic sad individual and reading my blogs is the highlight of his life. Plus he wants to insult me. I post all postings unless they contain racial insults(that's why I review them.)The fact I post the opposition is not luck its how I work.
BIGDOG - Bigdog lying on and insulting me because he feels insecure that he is a bad speller.
This is a quote from a guy who call himself bigdog. I will refrain from insulting him too much because unlike him I actually have substance and facts and do not need to engage in ad hominem attacks. Ok lets see where should we start, I did used to be a Christian and a Muslim...that's true. I never was and never have claimed to be a Buddhist,I am puzzled where he got that one from(probably pulled it from that over sized fat gelatinous ass of his) Oops I forgot no ad hominem attacks...I was never harassed as the Waldo rapist but I was questioned by police. plus I am no longer at KKFI but not due to what bigdog is trying to allude to. There is a whole site dedicated to what really happened and since bigdog can't read or spell he is not an accurate source of information on anything. He is a pathetic sad individual and reading my blogs is the highlight of his life. Plus he wants to insult me. I post all postings unless they contain racial insults(that's why I review them.)The fact I post the opposition is not luck its how I work.
Sunday, July 18, 2010
I Guess God Is Not All Powerful After All.Damn You God!
Whats is wrong with Bobby (bigEared)Jindal? Allowing guns in churches. Why? I thought you Jesus people were protected by the blood of Jesus and that was enough to protect you from harm. Or did you guys realize what I have always known is that you Jesus people are full of shit when it comes to your religious beliefs and you know its worthless. Because aren't you guys always nagging people about how powerful God is? Except if a gunmen breaks in the church and starts spraying down your congregation with bullets.Because if God is all powerful he can stop the bullets right? That's like saying I know the holy father protects us in church from danger... but just in case I have my gun...what a joke!
The great George Carlin predicted this trend years ago:)
The great George Carlin predicted this trend years ago:)
Civil Rights? What Civil Rights?
This is a reprint from my friend the Rude Pundit.
Let us pause for a moment here to praise a state for standing up for what we quaintly used to call "civil rights." You remember those? You remember the days before we were all suspects in crimes that hadn't occurred but, boy, oh, boy, they sure might? The Rude Pundit thinks there was a brief period between about 1975 and 2000 when that was actually true. Oh, what fun we had.
Now, amid Arizona's "The Constitution can blow a cactus" show-your-papers law and the support it's been getting from other states (not to mention piquant bits of spicy bullshit like Louisiana's Jesus wants you locked and loaded law), it's almost touchingly nostalgic, a bit retro, if you will, for a state legislature and governor to actually tell police, "No, that's a bit too far."
In New York, despite the amount of spittle flying out of New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg's mouth, Governor David Paterson is going to sign a law that says the police can't keep a database of the names, addresses, and Social Security numbers of every single person they stop and frisk. While "stop and frisk," as the stopping and frisking is called, is still quite a ways over the line of "innocent until proven guilty," at the very least, the cops won't be able to have your name on file so that every time there's a crime in your neighborhood, they come to question or arrest you for suspicion.
As for "stop and frisk," according to the NYPD's own records, "Last year, the police made a record 581,000 stops, bringing the tally since 2004 to nearly three million. Yet more than 85 percent of the stops never led to an arrest or a summons." You got that? In one year, the police intimidated nearly half a million people who didn't even have some weed on them. Oh, and 90% of the people stopped are non-white. And once they do that, the police wanted to keep your info on record forever.
Of course the cops are upset. Of course Bloomberg is upset. Surely, lots of people are willing to give up their rights in order to feel vaguely more safe. But let's let the mayor rather enthusiastically paint the picture of the future in his response to the law: "And what's wrong with keeping the data? We have data on everything. You wait until we have facial recognition software, and somebody's going to have a record of every person that walks down by your house. You just point a camera at them, the software will do it. That's coming. I mean, these days of, we put license plates on your car. You can read those by computer now, and we know where you're driving. Cell phones, everybody knows where you are."
And you know what? He's right. Feel safer?
Let us pause for a moment here to praise a state for standing up for what we quaintly used to call "civil rights." You remember those? You remember the days before we were all suspects in crimes that hadn't occurred but, boy, oh, boy, they sure might? The Rude Pundit thinks there was a brief period between about 1975 and 2000 when that was actually true. Oh, what fun we had.
Now, amid Arizona's "The Constitution can blow a cactus" show-your-papers law and the support it's been getting from other states (not to mention piquant bits of spicy bullshit like Louisiana's Jesus wants you locked and loaded law), it's almost touchingly nostalgic, a bit retro, if you will, for a state legislature and governor to actually tell police, "No, that's a bit too far."
In New York, despite the amount of spittle flying out of New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg's mouth, Governor David Paterson is going to sign a law that says the police can't keep a database of the names, addresses, and Social Security numbers of every single person they stop and frisk. While "stop and frisk," as the stopping and frisking is called, is still quite a ways over the line of "innocent until proven guilty," at the very least, the cops won't be able to have your name on file so that every time there's a crime in your neighborhood, they come to question or arrest you for suspicion.
As for "stop and frisk," according to the NYPD's own records, "Last year, the police made a record 581,000 stops, bringing the tally since 2004 to nearly three million. Yet more than 85 percent of the stops never led to an arrest or a summons." You got that? In one year, the police intimidated nearly half a million people who didn't even have some weed on them. Oh, and 90% of the people stopped are non-white. And once they do that, the police wanted to keep your info on record forever.
Of course the cops are upset. Of course Bloomberg is upset. Surely, lots of people are willing to give up their rights in order to feel vaguely more safe. But let's let the mayor rather enthusiastically paint the picture of the future in his response to the law: "And what's wrong with keeping the data? We have data on everything. You wait until we have facial recognition software, and somebody's going to have a record of every person that walks down by your house. You just point a camera at them, the software will do it. That's coming. I mean, these days of, we put license plates on your car. You can read those by computer now, and we know where you're driving. Cell phones, everybody knows where you are."
And you know what? He's right. Feel safer?
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
Vacant Vacuous Palin! :)
This is what I like to see O'reilly finally realizing what I have known for years and the rest of the country have known for years and what the GOP is finally realizing...that Palin is a lightweight. Look at how she can't answer follow up questions and how her mind is vacant politically. She is trying to give General answers and its not working...I loved how she said she is uncomfortable going down this path....translation... I have no idea how to answer that because I am a dumbass! Ha Ha I so enjoyed this tape of her squirming.
Start kissing O'reilly ass Glenn Beck.
Start kissing O'reilly ass Glenn Beck.
Friday, July 09, 2010
My Kind Of Woman!
Monday, July 05, 2010
Mexican Hate???????
I was listening to a local radio show and boy do they hate Mexicans. I mean how come no one is advocating anything against the real way terrorists and illegals are getting into this country...Legally! They get visas and then overstay their welcome. But I digress lets get back to the Mexican hate because we love to hate mexicans disguised as being against illegal immigration. Plus don't give me that illegal aliens do crimes because so do non-illegals. Also there is this lie about Obama waited 18 days(Darla J said that one) to respond to spill(big fat lie). Please click on link and I defy anyone of you do debunk these facts?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)