Saturday, December 31, 2005

Impeachment! Why yes.

This is what Bush's impeachment hearing will be like. It will play like that scene from a few good men.

Bush: Wiretapping? Wiretapping?

Son, we live in a world that has liberals.

And those liberals have to be stopped by men with wiretaps.

Who's gonna do it? You?

You, swiftboat Kerry?

I have a greater responsibility to defend our oil interests than you can possibly fathom.

You weep for the Constitution and you curse the NSA. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing how much I don't know: that the Constitution's death, while tragic, probably gave record profits to the oil companies.

And my reelection, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves profits...

You don't want the truth. Because deep down, in places you don't talk about at you gay marriage receptions, you want me spying on you. You need me spying on you.

We use words like God, late-term abortions, intelligent design... we use these words as the backbone to a life spent dividing a nation.

You use 'em to further your whiny liberal causes.

I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to my subjects who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very "freedom" I provide, then questions the manner in which I provide it!

I'd rather you just said "hail Bush" and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you flush down a Koran and start torturing some terrorists. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you're entitled to!

Congress: Did you order the wiretappings?

Bush: I did the job the Supreme Court elected me to do.

Congress: Did you order the code red?

Bush: You're goddamn right I did!!

And by god I mean the voices in my head.

And 9/11.
Boy those neo-cons really hate "rule of law" when it applys to them.

Friday, December 30, 2005

What a coward!

I am sure you have read the comments from the so called star child or the "child".
You see folks these cowards can not talk principle so what they are reduced to is gay name calling. The more he insults the less he knows. I have tried to remove entries from this person but I decided to let them stay on to show people what an idiot this person really is. You see folks this person will not call the show because they do not want to face real opposition so this is their only outlet. Maybe this person has gay issues I do not know or nor do I care.
But just remember this that everytime he posts something stupid just remember it is a testament to our side and how we are correct and they are lost so lets laugh at this human debris and wait for his next stupid posting.I would love to actually have an open dialogue between me and the "child" but I do not think they he has the capacity to be on my level. But I will await a negative posting in regards to this. You can do it "child"

Wednesday, December 21, 2005

The Freakman Cometh!

Okay I must admit whenever I hear Bill O'reilly say something about morality I burst out with a big gut laugh. Okay first of all it started wuth this judge(republican Bush appointee mind you) who ruled in Dover Delaware that intelligent design does not need to be mentioned as an alternative view in a biology class. The judge was right ID is not science. I mean how many churches let atheist groups get up in church and say there is an alternative view to theism.Answer none. So what is their f**king problem.
Oh yeah I forgot they are pests thats their problem.And for you readers I am not talking about the average christian I am talking about the Pat Robertston type nutcases. Anyway O'reilly went out against this gay movie called Brokeback mountain(about gay cowboys). He kept saying on how this movie was terrible and immoral(never saw it) then he would punctuate each sentence with I do not care about the movie. Then why talk about it then? I mean is this the same guy who told his female producer that he is masturbating over the phone while he is talking to her and how he loves a dildo in his ass. I think this movie hits close to home lil Billy and go see this movie you may realize something about yourself and if you can't come don't call.

They put the Funk in Dysfunctional!

It seems that the nutcases are at it again. These Christmas freaks are out of their mind. No please I am not bashing christmas I happen to like christmas but in an effort to get more money from their flock. These holiday pimps are taking very fringe isolated small cases of christmas bashing and making it mainstream. So they are creating a christmas crisis when none really exists. If you want to know whats that tantamount too just imagine if I gathered all the incidents of all isolated cases of white oppression against minorites then said on my show these whites are mean and they are attacking minorities everyday. Now thats not representative of all whites and thats stupid and imprudent to assume that premise. But if you will around look you will find that christmas crisis revels on fox news and every neo-con show.You see neo-cons look for logic like a thief looks for a policeman. If you hear a rattoothed neo-con give you that christmas lie again. Tell to shut up and take his/her f**king medicine.

Tuesday, December 20, 2005

Almost had him.

The following is a dramatization based on events that happened last year when Iraqi security forces captured Zarqawi and let him go because they could not identify him and also despite of the fact there are pictures of him all over the place.
Setting: Baghdad,Iraq police station.
(Scene: Two Iraqi police officers are questioning a suspect. They do not know who he is but in reality he is blood thirsty terrorist insurgent Zarqawi.)

1st Officer: So who are you friend?

2nd Officer: Yeah who are you? You look like this Zarqawi guy(throws down on the desk a copy of a magazine with Zarqawi's face on the cover).

Suspect(Zarqawi): Well my name is um...umm......ummm Ned and I am from Compton yeah thats right.

1st Officer: (disbelief)Hmmm are you sure. Because if you are the bandit Zarqawi, we will take you to the secret cia prison camp and torture you.

2nd Officer: Yeah we are already kidnapping innocent Oops! I mean were are capturing enemy combatants and with out much evidence we are dunking their heads in water until they drown and then we electroshock them back to life and ask them questions.Also we hook electrodes to their genitals and then zap them and then ask them questions and identify what terrorist group they are from we have to identify every potential terrorist.

Suspect(Zarqawi): Gosh that sounds alot like torture to me.

1st Officer: Shut up fool! we are merely engaging in light aggressive interrogation techniques according to the wonderful Bush adminstration memos.

2nd Officer: But back to the what we were saying earlier you look a lot like Zarqawi I mean you look like all the photos of him.

Suspect(Zarqawi):(using the Jedi mind trick on them) No I am not him, I am from Nebraska. You will not need my identification you will let me go at once.

1st Officer:(Jedi trick working)Well although we can not identify you and that is important. Despite the fact of your uncanny resemblence you are obviously are not him because we can not identify you. So we will continue snatching and detainng people and asking them hard questions and maybe we can find Zarqawi one day.

Suspects gets up to leave room and has he walks out the door he is greeted by his 6ft 6 wife wheeling a very strange contraption behind her. Hmmm probably nothing! The officers goes back to watching the ending of a movie called the "Usual Suspects".

Sunday, December 18, 2005

Wrong again! Doggy Dog Dog!

This is why Bush is in so much trouble. Look at the comment section of the previous posting. Much like the administration Big Dog cherry picked info concerning spying and accused me of being deceitful. This is what he said
I suggest you look at the law itself and stop your assinine media sourced opinions. I mean for fucks sake man, this is the second instance you have indulged in such ill-informed misleading tactics."

Okay you know Doggy is right! I mean although I said in my last posting that neo-cons do not let facts get in the way of their opinions. Maybe we should look at what Big Dog posted (note) There is a reason why thinking people like the NSA officials Aclu,Congress and others feel that laws were broken. You see No President can make an executive order that can supercede the Constitution with the exception of Martial Law(maybe). When you review what Big Dog put up you will come to find out has I have that these provisions did not cover domestic spying, hell it does not even mention the word domestic in any of Big Dog postings. You see law makers and the NSA knew this thats why they were a little antsy. Now here is where the splitting of legal hairs come in, the provisions cover foreign intel only now if you are intercepting emails that originate in the states thats not foreign intel thats domestic intel which has certain laws governing that which the President did not follow(notice Big Dog did not post anything having to do with domestic spying because he was trying to trick you and I (much like the President) to use those foreign provisions to apply domestically. (maybe big dog is not used to doing his own research if he makes a big blunder like that) Sorry Big Dog, that Dog won't hunt! So I want you to see Big Dogs postings its under the Say it ain't so post. Big Dog I am shocked that you in your dislike of me put up such a silly posting that proves my point again! Here is a question for you Dog (to get you on the right side of the arguement)I dare you to answer.. Where in the constitution allows the President to do what he did? And why did he violate the domestic portion of the act and bypass the courts? I will ask you this on the air tommorow Doggy and until you redeem yourself and apologize for being wrong you will be known as little dog. Impeachment anyone?

Anthony say it ain't So! Its So.

It seems that people do not realize the severity of this latest Bush fiasco.
There is a protocol stated forth in the law that the President has to follow involving warrants from the courts secret or otherwise. This man blatantly did not follow any rules. He bypassed the courts why? What constitutional law allows this? There were even operatives from the NSA (whose job it is to spy)who felt uneasy and wondered about the legality of this operation and did not help the administration out and I know this because it was implied in the article of the Times when it read that "Some NSA officials were so concerned about the legality of the program that they refused to participate" Also the Times said. "Questions about the legality of the program led the administration to temporarily suspend it last year and impose new restrictions." Now all of you individuals who love to quote FISA please do not forget this part....
The law governing clandestine surveillance in the United States, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, prohibits conducting electronic surveillance not authorized by statute. A government agent can try to avoid prosecution if he can show he was "engaged in the course of his official duties and the electronic surveillance was authorized by and conducted pursuant to a search warrant or court order of a court of competent jurisdiction," according to the law. Now this part is important

"Engaged in the course of his official duties and the electronic surveillance was authorized by and conducted pursuant to a search warrant or court order of a court of competent jurisdiction," Does anyone out there knows what pursuant means? Big Dog?

That is the part Bush missed because there were no warrants or court orders issued.
The only thing he did that neo-cons will try to say was court related was that he notified the judge and talked to some congressional members thats it! Notifying the court is not a warrant or a court order, neither is talking to Congressional members. Get it! And remember that the activities of the NSA fall out of the jurisdiction of the Patriot Act.(read it if you do not believe me). As a former board member of the ACLU (The American Civil Liberties Union)eavesdropping in the US without a court order and without complying with the procedures of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act is "both illegal and unconstitutional". Hey do not take my word for it. Listen to what Elizabeth Rindskopf Parker,former NSA general counsel said, "it was troubling that such a change would have been made by executive order, even if it turns out to be within the law".

Hey I just found this out the NSA activities were justified by a classified Justice Department legal opinion authored by John C. Yoo, a former deputy in the Office of Legal Counsel who argued that congressional approval of the war on al Qaeda gave broad authority to the president,this was according to the Times. Now remember Yoo was the one that made a very similar legal argument in another 2002 memo which outlined an extremely narrow definition of torture. That opinion, which was signed by another Justice official, was formally disavowed after it was disclosed by the Washington Post. Hey Neo-Con's please do not let these facts get in the way of your opinions.

Saturday, December 17, 2005

Just A Thought!

Your right Dennis(The Red)Menace about the communism remark. I'll fix that.
But I want to add to what you commented on. The neo-cons are bitch blind and can only see the bad that democrats and liberals and libertarians. So I doubt if any one will be honest about this. Remember "Compassionate Conservatism" is really "Friendly Fascism"!

Zarqawi who? Never heard of him!

Now here is something that makes me wonder. Iraqi security forces(What does that mean?) caught Zarqawi last year but released him. What the F**K?
And here is the punchline, because they didn't realize who he was according to the deputy minister Kamal. he told reporters. He said that Iraqi police "suspected this man" and detained him "along with other members" of his group. "Afterwards, he was released because we did not know the identity of this criminal," Kamal said.

"He was not armed," Kamal said. "He was like any other citizen who was suspected.
There was a simple interrogation with him and he was released."

Okay here is my evil point. If they can't tell when they've hit the jackpot, why are they detaining anybody?
If they let Zarqawi go - then who in the F**K are they detaining? Is it just me folks.

Funny Quotes!

Hey this is something Bush said and I thought it was funny enough to share it now if your a neo_con you will miss the humor and call me an american hater.

"Yes, I do."
- ( Bush, when he was asked by Britney Hume if he believes Tom DeLay is innocent.

Now here is my point that's strange because when they asked Bush "Is Karl Rove innocent?" he said "I can't comment on that." What a difference a lie makes.

1984 has already been here!

Okay I know you heard the reports about Bush authorized the NSA(here is an organization that really uses the Patriot Act) to spy on Americans.

The National Security Agency has eavesdropped, without warrants, on as many 500 people inside the United States at any given time since 2002, The New York(Bush) Times reported.

That year, following 9-11, Bush authorized the NSA to monitor the international phone calls
and international e-mails of hundreds — perhaps thousands — of people inside the United States.

Before the program began, the NSA typically limited its domestic surveillance to foreign embassies and missions and obtained court orders for such investigations.

The revelation that the Bush administration is using the NSA to spy on Americans without a court order is disturbing for many reasons. Besides the obvious move towards a crypto-fascist society the fact that the New York Times sat on this story for more than a year because the White House told them to(can you believe that shit,liberal media my ass) this act shows that not only are we secretly being spied on, but also that Bush has control over the press. This is an administration that pays journalist to push their agenda and misleads us into a war then changes the reason for it when it goes bad. Then fixes Saddams trial as not to implicate two Republican administrations
Am I the only one disturbed by this. Lets see Bush is good and Clinton had a intern pay attention to his nutsack and he is a dispicable and lying and untrustworthy person. Hmmm sounds about right!

Monday, December 12, 2005

Gotta Love Saddam!

Boy that Saddam is sure giving that "kangaroo court" a run for its money.
I mean not showing up for court, telling people to go to hell. I find this very entertaining. Just some questions I have surrounding this trial.

Why is he not being charged with anything having to do with 911?

Why is he being charged with crimes prior to 1982 and not the 1983 and 1988 crimes in which he killed Iranians and Kurds and put them in mass graves. Which is one of the reasons we invaded(remember mass graves being filled remember that bullshit)
I am sure it had nothing to do with the fact that we sold him those weapons and helped him cover up those kurds deaths. So Saddam recognizes that he is being setup so he is acting a fool and I love it.

Fake Outrage!!

I am loving this fake outrage act about "happy holidays" and "merry christmas" being eradicated form our speech. I mean there are so many genuine things to be mad about than this stupid stupid area of human interest. If you for even one second are outraged about this, then you need a life and you are really pathetic. I mean out of all that is going on in our country ie, mismanaged war, lies concerning this war, spy in the whitehouse. We as Americans pick this to be outraged about. Well F**k those who are outraged and F**k christmas too. Merry Christmas!

Friday, December 02, 2005

To Torture or not to Torture?

I can not believe that these neo-cons have trouble recognizing torture.
I mean rational human beings like ourselves know torture when we see it right? I mean I am not against torturing the terrorist when we find them, but lets be honest about what we do. Below is a lie er..... I mean quote from Cheney loyalist Porter Goss. Now decide for yourself if its torture.....

“What we do, does not come close to torture...”
-- CIA Director Porter Goss

Hmmm does not come close to torture......?
It's amazing that Goss would say that, after the White House admitted they've gotten
"valuable secrets" from their practice of "water boarding." Do you know what that is?

It's when you tie a man to a see-saw device, where the shifting of weight is enough to
lower his head under water. After he gets a few lungfulls of water, and sometimes dies,
they pull him out, electric-shock him back to life(stay with me) so they can torture him Oops! I mean ask him some more questions(I guess that electro shock thing is just to get his attention, Damn ADHD).
They kill him again and again - over and over - and if they go too far and he can't be
revived, they call it "a mysterious death" and have a Pentagon doctor rule that the
suspect died of "natural causes."

Does that sound like torture to you? Can we make that call????

A secret memo issued by Administration lawyers authorized the C.I.A. to use novel interrogation
methods—including “water-boarding,” in which a suspect is bound and immersed in water until he
nearly drowns. Dr. Allen Keller, the director of the N.Y.U. Program for Survivors of Torture, said that he had treated a number of people who had been subjected to such forms of near-asphyxiation,
and he argued that it was indeed torture. Some victims were still traumatized years later, he said.
One patient panicked when it rained. (When it freaking rained)