Okay folks I am preparing for the show. Tonight :Bill Clintons critique of Bush.
Kate Moss,Black water,plus more my friend Adrienne in New York City will be posting views on this blog so we welcome her input. Now the rant for today.
I am so tired of neo-cons talking about the liberal media for once and for all here is your proof that the media is not liberal. Prove me wrong I dare you!
What if a show like Dateline did a "hatchet job" on George W. Bush?
It wouldn't have to really be a hatchet job, but any honest appraisal of that idiot's
qualifications would prove he's a non-thinking rich man's boy - and that's all.
But what would happen if Dateline did an unflattering portrait of Bush?
I'll tell you what would happen:
The Rush(drug addict) would spend at least three hours saying it wasn't true
and he'd offer hours of rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Bill O'Reilly would spend at least an hour on his show saying
it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Sean Hannity would walk all over Alan Colmes for an hour that night,
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Eva Von Zahn would spend at least an hour that night saying it wasn't true
and she'd offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
The Beltway Boys would spend at least an hour that night saying it
wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Brit Hume and Tony Snow would spend at least an hour on Sunday
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Juan Williams and Mara Liason would spend their entire allotted time
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
John McLaughlin would spend at least an hour on his syndicated show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Chris the Screamer would spend at least an hour on his show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
G. Gordon Liddy would spend at least three hours on his radio show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Laura the Whore would spend at least an hour on her radio show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Michael Medved would spend at least an hour on his radio show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Sam and Cokie would spend at least an hour on This Whore
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
George (Judas Maximus) Steffi and George (dumb as a chimp) Will
would spend their entire allotted time swearing that it wasn't true.
Bob Scheiffer would spend at least an hour on Face the Whore
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Tim the Catholic would spend at least an hour on Meet the Whore
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
John Hockenberry would spend at least an hour on his show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Ollie North would spend at least an hour on his radio show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Robert Novak would spend at least an hour on his cable TV show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Paul Weyrich would spend at least an hour on his cable TV show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Still with me? We're close to the end...
MSNBC's Brian Williams would spend at least an hour on his show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Wolf the Whore would spend at least an hour on his show saying
it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.
Bill Schneider and Candy Crowley would do an hour special on CCN
(Clinton Cock Network) saying it wasn't true, and offering rebuttal.
John Stossel would have a special on ABC: Is lying OK for liberals?
Then Howie Kurtz would spend 30 minutes on Reliable Sources asking
if the media wasn't being too hard on a developmently-disabled child.
Ann Coulter would write a book condemning Dateline.
Laura Ingraham would write a book condemning Dateline.
Peggy Noonan would write a book condemning Dateline.
Andrew Sullivan would write a book condemning Dateline.
William Safire would write a book condemning Dateline.
OK, we're going to call the above "Exhibit A."
Now, everyone on that list has done at least a dozen hit pieces on Clinton.
My question is, Where is "Exhibit B?"
When those 38 people attack Clinton and his penis, who does the rebuttal?
Even you ditto-sheep have to admit that nobody on that list
has EVER defended a fabricated lie against the president.
There is no "Exhibit B," because there are so few liberal voices on television.
The closest you can get is Eleanor on McLaughlin or Geraldo, but there is barely
a liberal whisper on television, even though there are DOZENS of right-wing,
Smirk-apologist shows whose livelyhood is lying about liberals.
2 comments:
Neo-ConArtist wrote:"the Bible says God helps those that help themselves."
I've read my Bible and Book O'Mormon for many a year....and I'm just knockin' my brain trying to figure out where the Bible says what the Neo-ConArtist says.
Maybe a fine upstanding dominionist can tell me where it is.
I did appreciate you standing up for the posts Dennis. However I wasn't steering that part your direction. I know you weren't the one making the threat. I still stand on the interpretation of the bible. The language thing, you can find ebonics dictionaries online that doesn't make it proper English. I have seen not one post that doesn't include errors including yours. That wasn't my point. You missed it but that's okay. I'm glad you don't curse in church. I would hate to think your wishy washy. However since you are going to take time out of your day to school me on the bible I will return the favor. "The Heath Handbook" has a list of the preferred comparative and superlative forms of adjectives and adverbs. The handbook's rule of thumb is that, if a word is one syllable, use "er" and "est," as in "tall, taller, and tallest."
But . . . "Many adjectives of two syllables and all longer adjectives form the comparative and superlative by adding "more" and "most."
Examples: alert more alert most alert
ambitious more ambitious most ambitious
I suppose your friend would choose "alerter" and "alertest," but he would be in a "peculiar" minority.
I am British, and my dictionary is the Oxford English Dictionary - 'stupider' does not appear in this book. That meax problems of boundary determinations exist with respect to a majority of lands under the jurisdiction of the Commission. The Commission, therefore, proposes AB 856 to prevent an erosion of state ownership.
Section 1007 of the Civil Code lists the public entites [sic] whose property interests are exempt from claims of adverse possession. The State is not included in the list of exemptions. Therefore, a court could hold that title could be acquired by a claim of adverse possession against the state where the land is held by the State in its proprietar [sic] capacity. However, it is questionable whether adverse possession can be obtained against a sovereignm [sic] abd [sic] such a claim would probably fail.
To clarify this ambiguity in the existing law, AB 856 would include the State in the statutory list of public bodies whose property interests are exempt from claims of adverse possession. At the suggestion of the Sen
Post a Comment