"You liberals are always funny that is not thinking but always feeling your way from problem to problem. You 'guys' like to point out how stupid the Hannity's of the world are and yet 'you' hang on every word 'they' say. I was talking to a liberal Obongo supporter the other day at work and she admitted being fascist that is indoctrinating children into her political belief system. I mean I have to give credit to Michael Weiner for stating that liberalism is a form of mental illness".
-A rightwingers response to the Hannity posting below, proving again why his side is easy to beat.
Do these idiots ever respond intelligently with facts? He did not refute anything in my posting. Why do they only respond with anecdotal talking points? Why is he using an apostrophe(' ') in place of actual quotation (" ")marks when he writes? Has this guy ever heard of commas or periods? Why is he a dumb ass who thinks he can match me intellectually? Why do they always assume your a liberal when you criticize the rightwing?
10 comments:
You should ask yourself that first question. You had already tried, convicted and hung Hannity no matter what somone would say true or false. As to one’s wrting style I am flexiable. As far as matching you intellectually that would be an exercise in futility in the sense that you are way below my level. I doubt that your degree in hair weaving qualifies you for much of anything. Lastly you don’t just criicize the Right-Wing since your hate of white male conservatives is obvious in your humdrum, mundane, churlish blog. If it wasn’t for conservatives you would have nothing to write about.
As you reach into your quiver of ideas you find it empty of orginaility. The only arrows you can fling are the arrows of others ideas.
The liberal mind in action:
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/viewpoints/articles/2009/09/19/20090919maceachern0920.html
Since you are a towering giant intellect you should have no trouble picking this apart.
http://www.icr.org/home/resources/resources_tracts_scientificcaseagainstevolution/
The scientific method traditionally has required experimental observation and replication. The fact that macroevolution (as distinct from microevolution) has never been observed would seem to exclude it from the domain of true science. Even Ernst Mayr, the dean of living evolutionists, longtime professor of biology at Harvard, who has alleged that evolution is a "simple fact," nevertheless agrees that it is an "historical science" for which "laws and experiments are inappropriate techniques"2 by which to explain it. One can never actually see evolution in action.
Ha hahahahhahah. Well as Reagan said there you go again. I find it laughable your response. You still did not answer the primary question,so instead you attack with general statements and ad hominems and false appeals to reason. Gosh are you guys really that dumb? You are obviously insecure with your self. Also please double check your sources on your links because they are embarassing inaccurate especially the psuedo scientific one,stop w asting my time with right wing stupidity.
Sorry neocons I'm a thinker!! I know that as a center/left thinker I can look at each individual issue a weigh the merits and negatives of that issue without being led through groupthink from Jonah Goldberg "Liberal Fascism" or Michael Weiner "Liberalism is a mental illness". I know my buddy Anthony doesn't hate white male's because he takes on the issue of race and politics in this unique time in our history.
Do I have feelings and sympathy for people out in this country that are struggling?? "You Bet".
That doesn't make me mentaly ill but makes me human. (Deep down a lot of you NEOPOP's feel the same.) "WAKEUP DUMBASS'S"!!!!
Well, John I am not a neocon so you can leave the label at the door. We should pull our troops out of Iraq and Afghanastan ASAP...oh but wait...the boy wonder seems unwilling to do that...um maybe he is a neocon.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/88cb8a8a-8b41-11dc-95f7-0000779fd2ac,Authorised=false.html?_i_location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ft.com%2Fcms%2Fs%2F0%2F88cb8a8a-8b41-11dc-95f7-0000779fd2ac.html%3Fnclick_check%3D1&_i_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fliberalvaluesblog.com%2F%3Fp%3D2354&nclick_check=1
Anthony maybe you could be kind enough and list your academic credentials on this issue. Maybe list some scientific papers you have had published in peer reviewed publications.
As to the point of bringing up Hannity on the face of it he lied but then again maybe there is more to the story like I originally alluded to. The fact is that the Hannities of the world are scrutinized on a daily basis by hacks like you. They are bound to slip up from time to time.
Look at our dear First Lady and the hate in her expression: Wow...
http://i253.photobucket.com/albums/hh76/funderbunked/hatestare.jpg
I agree we should pull out of Iraq
and Afghanistan ASAP!!!. POTUS has a difficult dilemma with Afganistan because ot the unique problems with the geopolitical dynamics of that region.
Obama must be a neocon??? I don't think so because neocons have a agenda to promote american style democracy through force. (DUH!!! WE BRING FREEDOOM SO BE FREE DUHHH!!!) Look at Iraq and Afganistan for goodness sake as examples. I wish Obama would pull our troops out of both countries..............
John: You are correct in what you say but face it Obongo has put more troops into Afghanistan. What will be interesting is to see what happens with Iran. If he orders an attack I will watch in amazement as his supporters blame Bush. Obongo is overrated.
It is funny but already losing the 2016 Olympics, Bush and conservatives are being blamed. No doubt the race card will be played soon. Oh, Al Sharpton where are you?
Post a Comment