"People Believe In Free Speech, Until They Hear Free Speech They Do Not Like".
Friday, July 31, 2009
I Am Done With This Subject!
Big dog this is getting old. You do not understand police procedure. Fans are welcomed to read his comments in the comment section. First of all there is no such thing as you say a "flawed police report"..Ok! Crowley knowingly inserted those words in the report. A report with flaws get corrected before turning in, ask any cop? This "flawed report" nonsense is your euphemism for LYING! He lied that's all there is to it. You know it and I know it and the DA knew it! Any police report gets a proof read and checked and double checked for flaws.(its a legal document)before its submitted as record of fact.You do not make such an impotant"flaw" such as inserting a ethnic description in a report after interviewing the witness who said no such thing! Its just not possible.Unless you do it intentionally. All he had to do was to do what we call a "brief back" and confirmed it. Now the obstruction..If you can't understand that you are seeing this through a political prism and I am looking at it through a legal one. The campus is a red herring Big dog. You missed so much of my response. You are so fixated on this campus crap.it's moot! Gates is entitled to privacy in is dwelling. The cops had no right to breach that. Because if what you say is true then those charges would still be pending. They had no legal leg to stand on. So you can keep talking all that stuff your saying like campuses,obstruction,etc. Get past the politics! The fact of the matter is charges were dropped and you can guess why? Good day Dog!
I Expected Better.
Thanks Dog for writing me back. I appreciate the guts you have.
I have no idea why you glossed over some facts and highlighted other items that you wanted to view as fact. I think that you started off with a belief then found items to try to support your contentions(you are a lot like Darla J and Glenn Beck and Hannity and Rush in that respect and that's not a compliment)as opposed to how the "empirical method" actually works.So I am going line by line to respond to your baseless assertions.
WOW!!! bigDaddy just got a small tidbit of the case you wanted me to look up. This case and the one you posted are so different Bigdaddy, that you should read it for yourself.However i like being thorough and so far it seems to be a matter of discretion.
Not true BigDog! I can tell you have read a small tidbit of the case and not the whole finding by your response with that addled statement. In Commonwealth Vs Lopiano the courts found it was not unlawful to mouth off to a cop. Now the events took place in two different settings but that does not change the dynamic of the courts findings.(you do understand what precedent means and how it applies don't you?
Oh and im so glad you are not screaming racial profiling like all the other fools.
Ummmm......Thanks I guess! Well that's because unlike you. I am fairminded
The mere fact that this was on campus and where a substantial group of people had access and they began to congragate and given his racial tones towards a cop and plus the fact two warnings were given about his disorderly behaviour. All this didnt stop his charging tyrate wich got his ass arrested.So he assentially disobeyed an officers warning while trying to keep the peace. Is this considered obstruction?
Obstruction is interfering with a cops lawfully discharging his duties. You may or may not have a point there. But the rest of your comment you're totally leaving out the fact that Crowley lied in his report about what the witness said. So if he lied about that,what else did he lie about? That calls everything else into question.This
is the area you should also be concerned with but intentionally left out. Why?
Now getting arrested and getting charged are two different things. Im glad he didnt get charged because it would have easily been dropped due to his First Amendment right.However it doesnt mean a cop cant detain you to stop any further display or in fact riotous behavior on campus(penal code: deemed public area).
Ok, this is a strange one. I don't know why you even brought this one up. You are so right Dog, arrests and charges are different(WTF?)In the second statement you just made my point for me. Here are the facts; he was not "detained" ok got it, learn the difference! He was arrested and booked, fingerprinted and thrown in jail. Police can only bring initial charges. Its up to the DA to bring formal charges. The DA probably read the reports and decided how stupid this case was and decided to drop it.I never questioned detainment. His home was not considered a public area. You are so hung up about his house being on campus. That has nothing to do with it(WTF?) Why did not the campus police get dispatched or handle the call? Do you even know anything about the law? How come officer Figueroa wrote what the witness actually said and Crowley didn't? Can you answer that one for me I am waiting?
Heres what i know about you Bigdaddy. You said, on your show many times, how you have a healthy respect for the badge. You never had any problems with cops. One asked you why. I remember you saying because you are a yes sir no sir type of guy...i.e. very cooperative. Gates unhealthy respect lead him to get hauled off and later released.He gets hauled off for his actions and you defend him by saying its the cop acting stupidly. You appeared to be unbias at first blaming both parties so i dug into your psychi, but i knew deep down you didnt believe the shit you preached about respecting the badge and now this comes up it shows your racial bias and your lack of conviction in your own belief about respecting a badge.
Lol you have got to be kidding me, racial bias? Wow! I think its so telling about you in this statement. You see what you want to see. Only racists are quick to call other people racist or say that have a bias.You just glossed over the lie in Crowleys report and I have a racial bias? lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol,lol.
I have two words for you...SPELL CHECK!!!!!!!!!Lol
The real issue here is Gates and his lack of respect for authority and also underlining his actions is racism.Notice how Barracks friends have huge racial issues. Now Glenn Beck assertions.
Riiiiight? No its not the issue. The issue is you can not be objective! You glossed over what you really did not want to deal with. You already gotten so many things wrong Big Dog. After lying in a report. It sure can call other things into question wouldn't you agree? You are just so sure of yourself...Shit did you just bring up looney tunes Becks name...okay ok now I see how your mind works.
I am putting together more info on this disorderly behaviour thing(reading more penal codes for that area...etc) and quite frankly he should have been arrested and guess what he was.
WRONG!!!!!Look whatever..don't put it together I want you to actually read and study and dissect it and learn it. Okay? I already understand disorderly behavior.
On a personal note. Gates would have had his cane shoved up his ass talking to me in that tone. That Bigdaddy is why im not a cop. Because by law i couldnt be as thick skinned as a cop is told to be.
Wow, very macho.I'm glad your not a cop. Prone to violent outbursts and sado-masochistic or more correctly stated "sadistic" tendencies.Temper Temper. Wow' like a petulant child.Can't control yourself. Well that explains a lot about you now and I understand why you gloss over facts.If you have not gotten help please get help somewhere. and take your damn medicine!
Heres the kicker dont accuse a white man of racism, call him out using MOMMA slams and ignore verbal commands while a peace officer is trying to do his job. This will surelly get you arrested, may not get your charged, but is sure defuses the situation and potential riotous behaviour.
I noticed your using language from the case. Here is the kicker. Don't accuse the black man who may have behaved not so nicely when you have a white cop who lies in reports. That calls into question his whole integrity as a cop. Maybe Gates did not say those things maybe he was just loud. Because Doggy remember that Crowley said in his report(that you did not obviously read very well)he determined Gates was in his home lawfully. It should have ended there and he should have left,, riotous behavior or not! Dude you let me down again. I thought you really had something for me.
I have no idea why you glossed over some facts and highlighted other items that you wanted to view as fact. I think that you started off with a belief then found items to try to support your contentions(you are a lot like Darla J and Glenn Beck and Hannity and Rush in that respect and that's not a compliment)as opposed to how the "empirical method" actually works.So I am going line by line to respond to your baseless assertions.
WOW!!! bigDaddy just got a small tidbit of the case you wanted me to look up. This case and the one you posted are so different Bigdaddy, that you should read it for yourself.However i like being thorough and so far it seems to be a matter of discretion.
Not true BigDog! I can tell you have read a small tidbit of the case and not the whole finding by your response with that addled statement. In Commonwealth Vs Lopiano the courts found it was not unlawful to mouth off to a cop. Now the events took place in two different settings but that does not change the dynamic of the courts findings.(you do understand what precedent means and how it applies don't you?
Oh and im so glad you are not screaming racial profiling like all the other fools.
Ummmm......Thanks I guess! Well that's because unlike you. I am fairminded
The mere fact that this was on campus and where a substantial group of people had access and they began to congragate and given his racial tones towards a cop and plus the fact two warnings were given about his disorderly behaviour. All this didnt stop his charging tyrate wich got his ass arrested.So he assentially disobeyed an officers warning while trying to keep the peace. Is this considered obstruction?
Obstruction is interfering with a cops lawfully discharging his duties. You may or may not have a point there. But the rest of your comment you're totally leaving out the fact that Crowley lied in his report about what the witness said. So if he lied about that,what else did he lie about? That calls everything else into question.This
is the area you should also be concerned with but intentionally left out. Why?
Now getting arrested and getting charged are two different things. Im glad he didnt get charged because it would have easily been dropped due to his First Amendment right.However it doesnt mean a cop cant detain you to stop any further display or in fact riotous behavior on campus(penal code: deemed public area).
Ok, this is a strange one. I don't know why you even brought this one up. You are so right Dog, arrests and charges are different(WTF?)In the second statement you just made my point for me. Here are the facts; he was not "detained" ok got it, learn the difference! He was arrested and booked, fingerprinted and thrown in jail. Police can only bring initial charges. Its up to the DA to bring formal charges. The DA probably read the reports and decided how stupid this case was and decided to drop it.I never questioned detainment. His home was not considered a public area. You are so hung up about his house being on campus. That has nothing to do with it(WTF?) Why did not the campus police get dispatched or handle the call? Do you even know anything about the law? How come officer Figueroa wrote what the witness actually said and Crowley didn't? Can you answer that one for me I am waiting?
Heres what i know about you Bigdaddy. You said, on your show many times, how you have a healthy respect for the badge. You never had any problems with cops. One asked you why. I remember you saying because you are a yes sir no sir type of guy...i.e. very cooperative. Gates unhealthy respect lead him to get hauled off and later released.He gets hauled off for his actions and you defend him by saying its the cop acting stupidly. You appeared to be unbias at first blaming both parties so i dug into your psychi, but i knew deep down you didnt believe the shit you preached about respecting the badge and now this comes up it shows your racial bias and your lack of conviction in your own belief about respecting a badge.
Lol you have got to be kidding me, racial bias? Wow! I think its so telling about you in this statement. You see what you want to see. Only racists are quick to call other people racist or say that have a bias.You just glossed over the lie in Crowleys report and I have a racial bias? lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol,lol.
I have two words for you...SPELL CHECK!!!!!!!!!Lol
The real issue here is Gates and his lack of respect for authority and also underlining his actions is racism.Notice how Barracks friends have huge racial issues. Now Glenn Beck assertions.
Riiiiight? No its not the issue. The issue is you can not be objective! You glossed over what you really did not want to deal with. You already gotten so many things wrong Big Dog. After lying in a report. It sure can call other things into question wouldn't you agree? You are just so sure of yourself...Shit did you just bring up looney tunes Becks name...okay ok now I see how your mind works.
I am putting together more info on this disorderly behaviour thing(reading more penal codes for that area...etc) and quite frankly he should have been arrested and guess what he was.
WRONG!!!!!Look whatever..don't put it together I want you to actually read and study and dissect it and learn it. Okay? I already understand disorderly behavior.
On a personal note. Gates would have had his cane shoved up his ass talking to me in that tone. That Bigdaddy is why im not a cop. Because by law i couldnt be as thick skinned as a cop is told to be.
Wow, very macho.I'm glad your not a cop. Prone to violent outbursts and sado-masochistic or more correctly stated "sadistic" tendencies.Temper Temper. Wow' like a petulant child.Can't control yourself. Well that explains a lot about you now and I understand why you gloss over facts.If you have not gotten help please get help somewhere. and take your damn medicine!
Heres the kicker dont accuse a white man of racism, call him out using MOMMA slams and ignore verbal commands while a peace officer is trying to do his job. This will surelly get you arrested, may not get your charged, but is sure defuses the situation and potential riotous behaviour.
I noticed your using language from the case. Here is the kicker. Don't accuse the black man who may have behaved not so nicely when you have a white cop who lies in reports. That calls into question his whole integrity as a cop. Maybe Gates did not say those things maybe he was just loud. Because Doggy remember that Crowley said in his report(that you did not obviously read very well)he determined Gates was in his home lawfully. It should have ended there and he should have left,, riotous behavior or not! Dude you let me down again. I thought you really had something for me.
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
Buh Bye Sarah(You Quitter)!
Sarah Palin(R-Quitter)could'nt hack it and quit the other day.I love it.
A Follow Up! Anthony was just soooo Damn Right!
This is a great article and this is why Big Dog will always play in the pee wee leagues while Big Daddy Anthony plays on the dream team. Big Dog and other "mentally ill" people please learn the law(look up Commonwealth v. Lopiano)because you really made yourselves look really dumb. Your actions may work on stupid talk radio but in the real world you guys fall flat. This is a really good article and it cites that case. This article is by Adam Winkler. Btw don't write me unless you know the facts,give me a challenge.
Full article:
"On Thursday, President Obama weighed in on the arrest of African-American Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates, saying a Cambridge police officer "acted stupidly" when he arrested Gates for disorderly conduct. The next day, Obama backed down from his harsh comment.
Obama was right the first time.
I don't know if the police officer arrested Gates because of the Harvard professor's race. A lot of white people would say that if they mouthed off to a cop, they too would be arrested. But one thing is clear: Gates did not violate any law. Under Massachusetts law, which the police officer was supposedly enforcing, yelling at a police officer is not illegal. There are clear decisions of the Massachusetts courts holding that a person who berates an officer, even during an arrest, is not guilty of disorderly conduct. And yet that is exactly what Gates was arrested for.
The Massachusetts statute defining "disorderly conduct" used to have a provision that made it illegal to make "unreasonable noise or offensively coarse utterance, gesture or display," or to address "abusive language to any person present." Yet the courts have interpreted that provision to violate the Massachusetts Constitution's guarantee of freedom of speech. So police cannot lawfully arrest a person for hurling abusive language at an officer.
In several cases, the courts in Massachusetts have considered whether a person is guilty of disorderly conduct for verbally abusing a police officer. In Commonwealth v. Lopiano, a 2004 decision, an appeals court held it was not disorderly conduct for a person who angrily yelled at an officer that his civil rights were being violated. In Commonwealth v. Mallahan, a decision rendered last year, an appeals court held that a person who launched into an angry, profanity-laced tirade against a police officer in front of spectators could not be convicted of disorderly conduct.
So Massachusetts law clearly provides that Gates did not commit disorderly conduct.
The Cambridge Police should be training their officers to know the difference between legal and illegal conduct. What Gates did was probably not so smart -- in general, be nice to people carrying guns -- but it wasn't disorderly conduct. At least not in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
That explains why the charges against Gates were dropped. It wasn't because the police were trying to defuse the situation. It was because Gates had done nothing illegal.
Arresting someone for doing something that isn't illegal is pretty stupid.
Then again, perhaps Obama was wrong. Maybe the police officer wasn't acting stupidly. He was just acting abusively. That is even worse."
Full article:
"On Thursday, President Obama weighed in on the arrest of African-American Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates, saying a Cambridge police officer "acted stupidly" when he arrested Gates for disorderly conduct. The next day, Obama backed down from his harsh comment.
Obama was right the first time.
I don't know if the police officer arrested Gates because of the Harvard professor's race. A lot of white people would say that if they mouthed off to a cop, they too would be arrested. But one thing is clear: Gates did not violate any law. Under Massachusetts law, which the police officer was supposedly enforcing, yelling at a police officer is not illegal. There are clear decisions of the Massachusetts courts holding that a person who berates an officer, even during an arrest, is not guilty of disorderly conduct. And yet that is exactly what Gates was arrested for.
The Massachusetts statute defining "disorderly conduct" used to have a provision that made it illegal to make "unreasonable noise or offensively coarse utterance, gesture or display," or to address "abusive language to any person present." Yet the courts have interpreted that provision to violate the Massachusetts Constitution's guarantee of freedom of speech. So police cannot lawfully arrest a person for hurling abusive language at an officer.
In several cases, the courts in Massachusetts have considered whether a person is guilty of disorderly conduct for verbally abusing a police officer. In Commonwealth v. Lopiano, a 2004 decision, an appeals court held it was not disorderly conduct for a person who angrily yelled at an officer that his civil rights were being violated. In Commonwealth v. Mallahan, a decision rendered last year, an appeals court held that a person who launched into an angry, profanity-laced tirade against a police officer in front of spectators could not be convicted of disorderly conduct.
So Massachusetts law clearly provides that Gates did not commit disorderly conduct.
The Cambridge Police should be training their officers to know the difference between legal and illegal conduct. What Gates did was probably not so smart -- in general, be nice to people carrying guns -- but it wasn't disorderly conduct. At least not in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
That explains why the charges against Gates were dropped. It wasn't because the police were trying to defuse the situation. It was because Gates had done nothing illegal.
Arresting someone for doing something that isn't illegal is pretty stupid.
Then again, perhaps Obama was wrong. Maybe the police officer wasn't acting stupidly. He was just acting abusively. That is even worse."
Are You Guys F%$#king Kidding Me!
Monday, July 27, 2009
No Dog, Have "You" Read The Report?

Ok this is a response from a reader. You will notice that he almost seems arrogant, as if he is getting over on me. What he does not realize that he just goofed up.
"Ummmm...have you read the police report anthony??? I dont think you have, you may have read a few quotes posted by someone else, but i have read both officers reports. I havent found any witness reports written.
Gates report
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/
archive/years/2009/
0723092gates1.html
I suggest you read it before you pop off about someone not being arrested for disorderly conduct on their private property.
What if, said property, wasnt thiers? Say they rented it? Was it on campus?
First off that home is owned by Harvard U. and rented by Gates. This wasnt mentioned in the report but can easily be found with a lil search on your part.
Secondly the campus police were there and witnessed Gates outbursts at wich you said you believe the report and his "stupidly" outbursts. They also have audio of this and it is clear Gates was the provoker and did follow the officer outside,with the officer content on leaving at this point, Gates continued blasting him with racial charged tirade and being disorderly (?on campus?) and was warned 2-3 times to stop acting disorderally according to the report. Did you know this? you would have atleast recognised sufficient warning was given...right??"
My Response!
As you read this you will see that I never covered for Gate's behavior. Bigdog(you could've also capitalized my name you know).I have read that report and dissected it. But you Bigdog, you did not read that report at least not closely.Because you just made so many mistakes(let me point them out to you). Plus I bet you that you do not understand police procedure. Because if you did, you would notice what's missing from those reports. First of all Lucia Whalen claimed she saw "some gentleman" not a black male. The 911 tapes backs her up on that claim. Which was reflected in Officer's Figueroa's report. But not Crowleys report..Why? He mentioned race by putting words in Whalen's mouth(see report). You don't lie in reports or make mistakes like that.Those are legal documents. Something else in Figueroa's report that was not in Crowley's report one was "de escalation". You see in police work if it's not in your report then it did not happen. Every street cop knows this. Crowley never exercised any level of tactical communications. It's part of the force continuum.
This is why I question that part of his account plus he lied in his report. How come you did not catch any of this Bigdog? How come when Crowley knew who Gates was he still called more cops and the campus police? He could have just left despite Gate's stupidity. How come he changed Whalen's words in the report? You see Bigdog your knowledge only goes so far, but don't feel bad. How could you have known that Crowley was the contact officer and his account would be paramount. Also I don't care that he is a profile expert appointed by a black cop. Because all that expertise did not translate into something positive that night did it? Plus whether you rent a house or own your home you can't be arrested in it unless what I layed out in that posting takes place. Its still your property. You see Bigdog does not realize how many times cops have been dispatched to rental units and have that person mouth off to them and that person does not go off to jail. So again if it was a slam dunk they would not have dropped charges. So Big dog your wrong again! You see doggy if you understood he concept of "verbal judo" or "interpersonal communication skills" then you would know that the cop is trained to be professional so the criminal is expected to be and asshole but not the cop.According to Crowley's report he did not de escalate the situation. If he did then where in the report does he say that or at least indicate it, can you answer that bigdog? And don't give me that audio recording because it has not been released yet. So who knows what's really on it. Have you heard it big dog? I bet you have not. Why have they not released it yet? Hopefully they will. Because if whats on there is truly on there it would be out there now. Got an answer for me litte dog?
Also please give me an answer to the rest of the posting of how the GOP hates cops.You were so silent on that issue. Cat got your tongue? Tell me your extent on Law Enforcement knowledge? And lets hope they release that tape you never heard.PS: I will not give you crap about your spelling. Plus please answer all these questions for me I dare you? Also readers check out that link for yourselfs.
Sunday, July 26, 2009
ANTHONY'S GLOSSARY TERMS!
From time to time I speak in Anthonese and I want my fans to learn it also so. Now when you see these words now you will know the meaning behind it.
WIMPS: Democrats-excluding Paul Begala,Carville,Obama,Clintons,Al Franken,Maddow,Olbermann and Ed Schultz and Chris Matthews.
CHUBBLE-Trouble that fat republicans cause.(eg That Limbaugh always seems to cause alot of chubble).
MENTALLY ILL: Neo Cons or anyone who watches Fox News.
REFUND GAP: Women that have a large gap between their fake breasts(Kelly Conway..etc)
JACK BAUER: Any NeoCon man with a large forehead or twentyfour head(NeoCons have this strange gay love for fictional character Jack Bauer).
SHIM:Woman who looks like a man(eg Ann Coulter)
HELMET SPECIAL: A retard(Sarah Palin or W.Bush or anyone who believes in this Obama birth certificate conspiracy)
BISSUE:Bitch with issues.
BLAST: holding someone accountable.
BUCKET SEATS: Woman with a very nice butt(also see Duffle and Backpack)
Cadirack: A really ugly person.Also see "FUGLY" Fucking ugly!
CRYTO-CAKEBOY: A secretly heterosexually identified homosexual male who hates his own kind(usually republican).
VIOLENT DRUNK: Drunk violent women(created after conservative talk show host Laura Ingraham got drunk and went over to her boyfriends house and broke out all of his windows and threatened him on the answering machine).Also see bissues.
LIQUID PANTY REMOVER(LPR):Booze! Anything that gets the panties off quickly and the party started right just ask Argentinian booty tapper and Republican Governor Mark Sanford.
More to come!
WIMPS: Democrats-excluding Paul Begala,Carville,Obama,Clintons,Al Franken,Maddow,Olbermann and Ed Schultz and Chris Matthews.
CHUBBLE-Trouble that fat republicans cause.(eg That Limbaugh always seems to cause alot of chubble).
MENTALLY ILL: Neo Cons or anyone who watches Fox News.
REFUND GAP: Women that have a large gap between their fake breasts(Kelly Conway..etc)
JACK BAUER: Any NeoCon man with a large forehead or twentyfour head(NeoCons have this strange gay love for fictional character Jack Bauer).
SHIM:Woman who looks like a man(eg Ann Coulter)
HELMET SPECIAL: A retard(Sarah Palin or W.Bush or anyone who believes in this Obama birth certificate conspiracy)
BISSUE:Bitch with issues.
BLAST: holding someone accountable.
BUCKET SEATS: Woman with a very nice butt(also see Duffle and Backpack)
Cadirack: A really ugly person.Also see "FUGLY" Fucking ugly!
CRYTO-CAKEBOY: A secretly heterosexually identified homosexual male who hates his own kind(usually republican).
VIOLENT DRUNK: Drunk violent women(created after conservative talk show host Laura Ingraham got drunk and went over to her boyfriends house and broke out all of his windows and threatened him on the answering machine).Also see bissues.
LIQUID PANTY REMOVER(LPR):Booze! Anything that gets the panties off quickly and the party started right just ask Argentinian booty tapper and Republican Governor Mark Sanford.
More to come!
Obama Foot In Mouth Disease!
Ok, we all put our foot in our mouths all the time, just ask Bush or any neocon? Now Obama has given the lunatic fringe something to talk about with his slip of the tongue. Now the "mentally ill" will take this and run with it and its Obama's fault.
You see everything was going great until he was asked to opine about the Henry Gates issue and he started off good until he got to the "stupidly arrested" part. I knew that was going to be a problem when he said it. Ok here is my opinion on that matter.
Obama should have kept quiet about the issue. When I heard about the incident immediately I knew this was NOT! a racial issue but the "mentally ill" and the "wimps" and the media would make it one. You see, I feel both the cop and Gates over reacted that morning. Let's employ some sense of "cog"(for you racists reading this,look it up)...Gates just returned from a 16 hour flight from China(just that alone would make some people cranky. The cop was dispatched to a burglary in progress call. So he was in a intense state of mind as would any cop going on such a call. Meanwhile Gates is on the phone with the realty association letting them know of the door and that's when the cop shows up. He properly executes police procedure in requesting identification. But when he realized that Gates checked clean he should have left. Now Gates meanwhile was within his rights to ask for the officer's information. I also believe that written police reports every word about Gates reaction. But I also believe Gates when he said the cop would not give his information. And then Gates get arrested. They drop the case according to the chief because of good will. Now see obviously the chief thinks that we are all stupid or at least much watch Fox News. Because the reality of it is that the DA knew that the case would not stick in court. You can not arrest someone in their house for "disorderly conduct" because they are in their private home(you have to be on public property). Now conversely if there is a serious crime going on..drugs abuse, assaults or you believe they are a danger to themselves or others then you can arrest them.Cops go on house calls all the time and get into arguments and no one goes to jail.
See police report:
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2009/0723092gates1.html
That's what "verbal judo classes is all about". Now Obama you made a "Bush error" by running your mouth and not knowing all the facts. I feel you said what you felt and as a lawyer you knew that the cops move legally was "stupid" but you should have said it in a different way. Now the right wing will jump all over this because they are racists. But I think Chris Matthews said it best when he postulated that what if the situation was reversed but with the same circumstances but the cop was black and the guy was white? What would the reaction be? I think we have the answer to this already. The Republicans love to attack law enforcement when it suits their purposes,remember Elian Gonzales and Waco and the freaky gay senator caught with his dick out in a stall in Minnesota? Hell even "convicted Watergate felon" and nutjob G Gordon Liddy called a law enforcement cops "jack booted thugs" which prompted a response from George H W Bush. So that's how the Evil one saw it. Now I turn it over to the racists so they can cull some anti-white lies out of it.
You see everything was going great until he was asked to opine about the Henry Gates issue and he started off good until he got to the "stupidly arrested" part. I knew that was going to be a problem when he said it. Ok here is my opinion on that matter.
Obama should have kept quiet about the issue. When I heard about the incident immediately I knew this was NOT! a racial issue but the "mentally ill" and the "wimps" and the media would make it one. You see, I feel both the cop and Gates over reacted that morning. Let's employ some sense of "cog"(for you racists reading this,look it up)...Gates just returned from a 16 hour flight from China(just that alone would make some people cranky. The cop was dispatched to a burglary in progress call. So he was in a intense state of mind as would any cop going on such a call. Meanwhile Gates is on the phone with the realty association letting them know of the door and that's when the cop shows up. He properly executes police procedure in requesting identification. But when he realized that Gates checked clean he should have left. Now Gates meanwhile was within his rights to ask for the officer's information. I also believe that written police reports every word about Gates reaction. But I also believe Gates when he said the cop would not give his information. And then Gates get arrested. They drop the case according to the chief because of good will. Now see obviously the chief thinks that we are all stupid or at least much watch Fox News. Because the reality of it is that the DA knew that the case would not stick in court. You can not arrest someone in their house for "disorderly conduct" because they are in their private home(you have to be on public property). Now conversely if there is a serious crime going on..drugs abuse, assaults or you believe they are a danger to themselves or others then you can arrest them.Cops go on house calls all the time and get into arguments and no one goes to jail.
See police report:
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2009/0723092gates1.html
That's what "verbal judo classes is all about". Now Obama you made a "Bush error" by running your mouth and not knowing all the facts. I feel you said what you felt and as a lawyer you knew that the cops move legally was "stupid" but you should have said it in a different way. Now the right wing will jump all over this because they are racists. But I think Chris Matthews said it best when he postulated that what if the situation was reversed but with the same circumstances but the cop was black and the guy was white? What would the reaction be? I think we have the answer to this already. The Republicans love to attack law enforcement when it suits their purposes,remember Elian Gonzales and Waco and the freaky gay senator caught with his dick out in a stall in Minnesota? Hell even "convicted Watergate felon" and nutjob G Gordon Liddy called a law enforcement cops "jack booted thugs" which prompted a response from George H W Bush. So that's how the Evil one saw it. Now I turn it over to the racists so they can cull some anti-white lies out of it.
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
I Love Maddow !
This is what I am talking about. This is what happens folks when you give the facts. The racists can't respond and they are shown to be very stupid. Check out how Maddow handles that little Nazi Pat Buchanan when he went on a racial tirade on MSNBC. Remember facts are kryptonite to these fascists.
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
Banned Commercial!
Now this Sprite commercial was banned in Europe. I can understand why. It would be inappropiate to have shown this on tv. What was Sprite thinking? Now I have spent time in Europe and nudity is a natural part of their culture which is interesting. Now on the other hand I love this commercial and I am posting it here for your enjoyment. I mean you have this man and woman and she gets a facial of Sprite(Hell yeah)! This commercial would never run in America. We would rather have our children watching violent images instead of two consenting adults engaging in an sexual activity. Btw I don't drink alot of soda but if I do I will be drinking Sprite!
Anthony's Note: She could brush up on her technique a little bit more.What a good girl.
Sunday, July 19, 2009
Rightwing Nuttery!!

Okay guys here is your big chance to prove me wrong. Please explain to me what is behind the Obama birth certificate controversy? Why are you right wingers pushing this story? So let me hold your feet to the fire. They claimed a relative of Obama's claims he thinks Obama was born in Kenya(he thinks). Incidentally they also claimed that Obama's brother lived in a rundown shack and was poor (but that turned out to be a lie) Fox News still has not corrected that one. But I digress. Let us lay out the facts here. The Obama campaign a while back has produced his birth certificate proving he was born in Hawaii.
Now some may say its a reproduction(which it is)but so is mine and a lot of other peoples when you do not have an original copy. You get a official reproduction complete with the state seal. Now despite the facts that government officials,reporters(even those people from factcheck.org)have seen felt and handled and photographed the original. Now some right wingers still say its a fake and the doctor lied(see where this is going). Let me spell it out. You have to to be born in the state to get a certificate that claims you were born in that particular state. Now conversely you can get a birth certificate in any state that says you were born out of state or country. So if you were born in Kenya or China you can get a certificate from Hawaii or Kansas or California or any other state stating that you were born in Kenya or China(military families do it all the time). But you cannot be born anywhere else and get a certificate from the state you were not born in stating that you were born there. That is impossible! So you guys want us to believe that you found something that Hillary failed to find. Brangelina's kids were born in Africa but are still considered Americans btw. So here are my questions.
What credible evidence do you guys have that proves he was not born in Hawaii?
What credible evidence can you produce that proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that he was born in Kenya?
Has there been any other cases where this has happened?
Do you want us to believe(according to your logic) that his hippy mother gave birth to him in Kenya then somehow knew he was going to run for president so secretly brought him back to Hawaii past customs without a passport or proper documentation or identification for the child(no record of the trip btw,also this is Hawaii its not like you could run across the border you know, either plane or boat)then somehow got an entire hospital staff to lie and got the government of Hawaii to lie also and produce a fake document which is a gross violation of federal law?
So whats your answer? I'm waiting!
Friday, July 17, 2009
Funny And Good Speech!
I am not a big fan of the NAACP but I love this speech. (better than Bush speech a while back see youtube)What an entrance. Oh for the racists go ahead and leave something stupid and racist for this posting. I expect it.
Chris Baker Dummy!
This Chris Baker. He is a sometime stand up comedian who used to do a talk show here in town then went to Texas. He is not that bright and he was not a right winger when he was at 710 KCMO sellout(whore) and all he does is talking points and insults as you can see here. He is also under the impression that he is funny and cool. This is him with Bernie Ward former talk show host from KGO in San francisco. Bernie kicked his ass in this interview because he did something that most people don't do stand up to these wingnuts using guts and what they fear most ...FACTS!!! Watch Chris bitch up and leave because he can't answer a question.